Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Borax Queen; fanfan; GMMAC; NorthOf45; Tolerance Sucks Rocks; Clintonfatigued; AuntB; ...
I'm not amused by the secrecy surrounding these meetings and by how the elitists continue to eat cake.>>>>>>>>>>

It doesn't take much of a leap to guess that the meetings real urgent topic of discussion would be:

1)Russian incursion into the Canadian Arctic.

2) Russian future incursion into the Caribbean, via Cuba and Venezuela.

3) Chinas control of the Panama Canal and incursion into the Caribbean and South America.

4) The containment of Chavez's rapidly expanding military might.

A new cold war era is upon us, and Mexico, Canada and the US are ill prepared. Canada has no significant military in proportion to its national defense needs. The US military is spread thin overseas. And Mexico's military is very busy battling drug gangs and insurgents in Chiapas. The West is now weak, and I suspect that the Montebello secrecy was necessary to enable strategic discussions between the three heads of state on expanding and improving the hemisphere’s military power, in order to protect Mexican Oil feels, Canada's resource- rich north, as well as their respective homelands.

You will hear nothing of this in the news, while all the xenophobic protests are on the straw man of protecting Canada's National Sovereignty from malicious conspiracies. They construct their own windmills and quixotically tilt at them, and then pat themselves on their backs like children.

This distraction strategy of this summit meeting has worked. Watch for upcoming military equipment and ordnance lend lease agreements as well as policy changes by all three in relation to China, Russia , and Venezuela. There are much bigger fish to fry than what is being reported in the press, who have all become slavishly rooted in supporting a bunch of liberal moonbats in their delusory, sordid political meanderings. Most Canadians think the protesters are a few cards short of a deck, and the protesters do not represent Canadian main stream thinking by a long shot.

Let them protest. Soon all Canadians will be glad our prime minister has had the foresight to strengthen and overhaul Canada's military, with the help of the USA and Mexico. And the protesters? Watch them fall silent when asked if they would stand to defend their nation, under arms, rather than merely caterwauling about maintaining sovereignty without the ability to defend the large land mass that is Canada. Nincompoops! As usual all talk and bluster, but they know not the real issue and its implication for their future.

Canada will soon be forced militarily occupy the North, or give up its sovereignty over vast stretches of territory replete with natural resources, to the expansionist Russians, who mean to choke the West of oil, and cause economic and social collapse. Putin's goal is the same in the Middle East

When I see these moonbat protestors at Montebello, I believe that the Russians are already successful in that regard. They constitute terminal case of the mouse that roared, and thank goodness that the majority of Canadians do not take them seriously.

24 posted on 08/21/2007 6:48:14 PM PDT by Candor7 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Baghdad_(1258))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Candor7

Bump


27 posted on 08/21/2007 6:51:30 PM PDT by kanawa (Don't go where you're looking, look where you're going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Candor7

Interesting how your post 24 answers the question in my post 25.


28 posted on 08/21/2007 6:54:52 PM PDT by ovrtaxt (Sworn to oppose control freaks, foreign and domestic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Candor7; Borax Queen; doc; ovrtaxt
Actually, it is no secret, they are there to discuss the NACC recomendations.

And, although Judicial Watch has said that they will file FOIA to find out what those evil businessmen are up to, we(the globo-phobes) can find, on the internet, all of NACC's recommedations for 2007, 2008, and 2010.

84 posted on 08/22/2007 3:10:52 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson