Skip to comments.
Women really do prefer pink, researchers say
Reuters via Yahoo ^
| 2007 Aug 20
| Reuters
Posted on 08/21/2007 11:32:12 AM PDT by Brujo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-159 next last
Yet another biologically based gender difference. That statement about why men don't think about color is hilarious.
1
posted on
08/21/2007 11:32:14 AM PDT
by
Brujo
To: Brujo
2
posted on
08/21/2007 11:34:07 AM PDT
by
stylin19a
(Go Bears !)
To: Brujo
Homos too.
Owl_Eagle
If what I just wrote made you sad or angry,
it was probably just a joke.
3
posted on
08/21/2007 11:34:15 AM PDT
by
End Times Sentinel
(In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
To: Brujo
“For men, thinking about colors was less important because as hunters they just needed to spot something dark and shoot it, Hurlbert said.”
That WOULD be hilarious if the guy who said it hadn’t actually believed it. Now it’s just sad.
4
posted on
08/21/2007 11:35:10 AM PDT
by
L98Fiero
(A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
To: Owl_Eagle
Homos too. Be advised that todays politically correct terminology is gay homosexual. :>)
5
posted on
08/21/2007 11:37:43 AM PDT
by
beltfed308
(Rudy: When you absolutely,positively need a liberal for President.)
To: Brujo
We can only hope that millions of taxpayer dollars were spent studying this.
To: Brujo
Did they survey Rosie O’Donnell, Martina Navratilova, or K.D. Lang?
7
posted on
08/21/2007 11:38:33 AM PDT
by
PBRSTREETGANG
(Apparently my former party considers me an "ugly nativist".)
To: L98Fiero
Didn’t feminists say that there are no biological differences between men and women, with the possible exception of between the legs differences?
To: beltfed308
The term homosexual is considered insulting by some, because it is a sterile clinical term. That term focuses only on certain behavior and not the whole person, so some in that community don’t like that term anymore.
To: Dilbert San Diego
“Didnt feminists say that there are no biological differences between men and women, with the possible exception of between the legs differences?”
And that’s nothing a little tax-payer funded surgery won’t fix.
10
posted on
08/21/2007 11:40:20 AM PDT
by
L98Fiero
(A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
To: Dilbert San Diego
“The term homosexual is considered insulting by some, because it is a sterile clinical term.”
If one is offended by “sterile, clinical terms”, there is NOTHING that won’t offend them.
11
posted on
08/21/2007 11:41:44 AM PDT
by
L98Fiero
(A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
To: beltfed308
Be advised that todays politically correct terminology is gay homosexual. :>)”
I think “fags” or a longer version of that is acceptable, also. Or, wait, do I have that backwards...
To: L98Fiero
That WOULD be hilarious if the guy who said it hadn't actually believed it. Now it's just sad.Actually it's a woman—“Anya Hurlbert”—who wrote the report. I think she was grasping for a reason why her husband would rather chew glass than go with her to pick out just the right shade of off-white for the dining room trim.
(Oops, I slipped into gender-based stereotyping again! ;-)
13
posted on
08/21/2007 11:42:37 AM PDT
by
Brujo
(Quod volunt, credunt.)
To: Dilbert San Diego
So they have to corrupt a good word to FEEEEL better!
Queers corrupt anything they touch!
14
posted on
08/21/2007 11:42:54 AM PDT
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
(Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto)
To: Owl_Eagle
I can pretty much say that I have never and will never own one of these.....
And if someone....say, a female.....should ever buy me one and expect me to wear it, siad female be shown the door.
15
posted on
08/21/2007 11:44:03 AM PDT
by
shbox
To: PBRSTREETGANG
Oh I’m sure they like pink, too.
16
posted on
08/21/2007 11:45:02 AM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
(USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
To: PBRSTREETGANG
Did they survey Rosie OÂDonnell, Martina Navratilova, or K.D. Lang?Hmm, I sense a large government grant: Gender Preference and its Effect on Chromatic Preferences.
(Unfortunately, probably not “:-)”.)
17
posted on
08/21/2007 11:45:55 AM PDT
by
Brujo
(Quod volunt, credunt.)
To: stylin19a
18
posted on
08/21/2007 11:46:44 AM PDT
by
PBRSTREETGANG
(Apparently my former party considers me an "ugly nativist".)
To: Brujo
Evolution can explain color preferences, too? *Roll eyes*
Is there ANYTHING it can’t do?
19
posted on
08/21/2007 11:47:27 AM PDT
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: Brujo
“Boys like blue, girls like pink and there isn’t much anybody can do about it”
NAG’s feminazi’s aren’t going to like this!
20
posted on
08/21/2007 11:48:06 AM PDT
by
vetsvette
(Bring Him Back)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-159 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson