Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HBO gets raw -- or is it raunchy? (HBO gets into the hardcore porn business)
The Chicago Tribune ^ | July 14, 2007 | Scott Collins

Posted on 08/20/2007 11:59:41 AM PDT by DesScorp

Bosoms and things: That's not exactly a plot summary of "Tell Me," but it's not a bad place to start. Because that's where many viewers will start. Whatever else it may or may not be, "Tell Me," at least in its current form, will set a new precedent for prime-time TV when it has its premiere Sept. 9: No previous series, on pay cable or anywhere else, has dared show anything even close to this much skin; the climax, if you will, of the first episode finds a woman (Sonya Walger) in her 30s masturbating her husband (Adam Scott) to orgasm, with the entire act and all relevant body parts plainly visible. Even Jane Alexander — yes, that Jane Alexander, the snow-domed, regally poised 67-year-old former chief of the National Endowment for the Arts — drops trousers for some frisky senior sex

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: cable; hbo; morals; porn; trashtv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: andy58-in-nh

well, some bedroom type scenes leave things to imagination. Such as when you see a couple under the covers in a bedroom scene in a movie.

but in this case they are showing a man totally excited??? yes this kind of thing crosses a line. But then it’s HBO and it’s pay cable so they aren’t bound by decency guidelines.


21 posted on 08/20/2007 12:15:28 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: traditional1

The FCC doesn’t have anything to say about cable tv or pay-per-view or what you can buy at the sleezy video store. Nor should it.


22 posted on 08/20/2007 12:15:58 PM PDT by VRWCmember (Fred Thompson 2008! Taking America Back for Conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: traditional1

“There’s no outcry from the FCC; they’re too busy building the “Fairness Doctrine” to muzzle talk radio......”

I don’t think the FCC has much control over pay-per-view cable.


23 posted on 08/20/2007 12:16:04 PM PDT by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: traditional1

Why would FCC get involved in a pay channel? Do you realize the government that you want in our lives only looks at three main channels...too many if you ask me. I don’t want government in my life or my family at all or as little as possible. My wife and I make the decisions about TV in my house not a government entity. It is a shame that you can’t do the same. It is not too difficult especially for a true conservative. Oh well. I guess some people just need to have the security blanket of government in their lives.


24 posted on 08/20/2007 12:16:12 PM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian

Actually, the pilot episode of the US version of Coupling was pretty much the same script as the UK version. The main difference was that the UK version was funny. The actors and their delivery in the US version were just bad. And you just can’t duplicate the UK Jeff, who is probably the only person in the world who could coin a phrase such as “porn buddies” for lack of any better terms and just be funny about it.


25 posted on 08/20/2007 12:16:20 PM PDT by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a Liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DesScorp

In retaliation, you have to begin to wonder what Skinemax will do?


26 posted on 08/20/2007 12:16:57 PM PDT by HitmanLV ("Lord, give me chastity and temperance, but not now." - St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Yep. All of the sudden we’re all about REGULATION from the Government. Go figure.


27 posted on 08/20/2007 12:18:33 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: AU72
Jane Alexander doing hard core porn on HBO?!

Jane, you ignorant slut....

28 posted on 08/20/2007 12:18:46 PM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: traditional1

Oops. Sorry about my post although not really directed at you. Sometimes it is difficult to read a post, write something and then get further information down the line.


29 posted on 08/20/2007 12:18:58 PM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

To be fair, the poster changed his tune later down the thread.


30 posted on 08/20/2007 12:19:41 PM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DesScorp

Slouching towards Gomorrah , pt VIII

“Even Jane Alexander — yes, that Jane Alexander, the snow-domed, regally poised 67-year-old former chief of the National Endowment for the Arts — drops trousers for some frisky senior sex”

I can’t think of any better response than ...

Jane, you ignorant slut!


31 posted on 08/20/2007 12:23:23 PM PDT by WOSG ( Don't tell me what you are against, tell me what you are FOR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember
The FCC doesn’t have anything to say about cable tv or pay-per-view or what you can buy at the sleezy video store.

Boy, do they want the internet though...

Since cable and internet are becoming alike, that's one way they could get their hands on it.

32 posted on 08/20/2007 12:23:24 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

In the absence of truly creative, innovative, and intelligent programming, it seems inevitable that cable outlets like HBO will push the envelope as far as they can in the direction of the lowest common denominator, which often involves sexual themes. Now, I have nothing against sex whatsoever, or even its graphic depiction, but for $180 a year (or whatever it is they now charge), one might reasonably expect something better than the cheap thrills you can get on the Internet for free.


33 posted on 08/20/2007 12:23:28 PM PDT by andy58-in-nh (There are two kinds of people: those who get it, and those who need to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian
Whoops, I guess I can't link to that image... Let's see if this one works:


Sonya "Butterface" Walger: porn actress

34 posted on 08/20/2007 12:23:29 PM PDT by Yossarian (Everyday, somewhere on the globe, somebody is pushing the frontier of stupidity...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DesScorp
HBO already has plenty of trash, Showtime seems worse from what I read about it.

"RealSex" is absolutely crass and disgusting. That "Taxicab" filth is supposed to be critically acclaimed?

But I'm still waiting for the public outcry after seeing Paris Hilton and Nicole Richie giving people enemas and then watching them poop. Things have gotten bad out there, folks.

35 posted on 08/20/2007 12:23:47 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
'The best form of censorship is to turn the channel.' ~ George W. Bush, 2000 debate with Al Gore

He's right. The government has no place in this. If you don't want to see the sex, turn the channel.

36 posted on 08/20/2007 12:24:40 PM PDT by rintense (I'm 4 Thompson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

great minds think alike alert.


37 posted on 08/20/2007 12:25:01 PM PDT by WOSG ( Don't tell me what you are against, tell me what you are FOR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DesScorp
I remember watching the Tonight Show with Johnny Carson many years ago, when Gregory Peck was on. They were discussing the recent port trial of John Holmes, when Peck said: "You know, someone once asked me that and I said the day that Laurence Olivier drops his pants on the screen is the day that I will support adult actors, and then I saw the movie The Betsy."

I guess a lot has changed with the Hollywood Old Guard these days.

-PJ

38 posted on 08/20/2007 12:25:30 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Repeal the 17th amendment -- it's the "Fairness Doctrine" for Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
Ratings equal money. There is no where U.S. mass media, if unrestrained, won’t go in search of a dollar. Jerry Springer proved that.

Its HBO, ratings are not the main factor, but the point of seeking the most money is very true.

That said, considering how HBO makes its money (remember, no commercials, ratings don't mean crap), this is one of the stupidest decisions any exec could make.

39 posted on 08/20/2007 12:28:37 PM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
"I guess some people just need to have the security blanket of government in their lives"

Yes; they're called Liberals and/or Socialists.

40 posted on 08/20/2007 12:30:43 PM PDT by traditional1 ( "A liberal is someone who feels a great debt to his fellow man, which debt he proposes to pay off)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson