Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
This is a medium volume pinglist.
Posted on 08/20/2007 9:19:52 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
Can anyone provide an explanation on why the Aussies retired their carrier?
ping
The Aussies elected a liberal government which chose not to fund a replacement.
Money and sailors to man it!!!!!!............
The Aussies brought 2 light carriers(less than 20K tonnes) from Britain after the second world war,the last of them being taken out of service in the early 80s,since they were obsolete.Australia intended to purchase the HMS Invincible along with Harrier jets,but the Falklands war convinced Britain to keep them.
With China as a looming threat this makes sense.
That I don’t know, but I would think they are looking at China as a possible threat.
1. Age. Had been in service 28 years. Was due to be replaced by HMS Invincible (to be renamed HMAS Australia), After the Falklands, the Brits decided to retain Invincible
2. Labor Party tradition. When newly elected scrap some defence capabilty (usually Navy), In 1972 it was the troop transport HMAS Sydney, the new fast combat support ship and DDL programs. (The Air Force lost a Mirage squadron at the same time)
In 1982 it was Melbourne/Melbourne relacement
I hear we may have a carrier (CV-67, USS JFK) that is still servicable.....maybe we are going to arrange a sale??????
1. It's not servicable without spending a couple of billion dollars
2, Even if it was, it's too frelling big to dry-dock in Australia, and requires too many crew.
I hope we can do something to help the Australians to build the strike capability of their navy. The ChiComs are building their navy as fast as possible. The Aussies are friends. All of the testicles that remain in the English-speaking world are in the United States, Australia and New Zealand.
US Marines train on HMS ILLUSTRIOUS
and now this.
Intersting and good developments for Western cooperation
Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
This is a medium volume pinglist.
“Can anyone provide an explanation on why the Aussies retired their carrier?”
It’s hard to pay for a carrier with such a small population.
This is not necessarily for the Royal Australian Navy.The Super Hornets are for the Airforce.Training on US carriers give them long range capabilities in the event of conflict.All on (Uncle Sam’s) House!!!!!!
There is little evidence to suggest now that the Aussies plan to build dedicated carriers,let alone one to deploy the Super Hornet.They are considering,though,modifying their 2 upcoming amphibious ships to launch the F-35B V/STOL versions.
You mean the same New Zealand that wound up it’s Air Force a few years ago?????
The Navy has a handful of exchange instructors in our training units and a lot of them request to carrier qualify at the end of their initial training. It isn't required, but many do it for the experience and credibility with their future students. I don't care what country you are from fighter pilots don't like being called chicken.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.