Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ellery
"If they can't get you for obscenity, they'll get you for violating record-keeping," he said. Such a violation would carry a five-year penalty.

Right out of the BATF playbook.

I didn't realize that underage kids in porn was so prevalent. (hint - it ain't.) Anyone who is going to do that won't register, anyway. This will just create a massive regulatory bureaucracy for enforcement. It is not my kind of conservative.

We're supposed to believe they can't figure out where all the illegals are, but they can figure out where all the porno actors/actresses are? Give me a break.
16 posted on 08/19/2007 6:31:11 PM PDT by GovernmentIsTheProblem (The GOP is "Whig"ing out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GovernmentIsTheProblem
It is not my kind of conservative.

That's because it's not conservative...it's big government nannyism...

127 posted on 08/19/2007 10:18:51 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: GovernmentIsTheProblem

but they can figure out where all the porno actors/actresses are?

Government stupidity on display. Illegals first, then porn stars I say. BTW, they seem to have a handle already on child porn, due to the internet search for those involved. What this looks like is a search for TEEN porn stars, under the age of 18, and I thought studios were already certifying the status of the actors. Isn’t actor an ironic choice for a description?


151 posted on 08/20/2007 5:41:00 AM PDT by wita (truthspeaksi@freerepublic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson