The full faith and credit clause does not require a State to substitute for its own statute, applicable to persons and events within it, the conflicting statute of another State, even though that statute is of controlling force in the courts of the State of its enactment with respect to the same persons and events, -- at least in the absence of action by Congress prescribing the extra-state effect to be given state statutes.
The SPECIFIC cases are all pretty much with minors, NOT adults. IE two kids who ran away and came home and the parents had the right to undo the marriage as an interested party.
The case law (post interacial marriage breeding laws) for adults is silent AND the statutes show a strong presumption to legitimize children and marriages of adults.
The exceptions clause argument is legal BS.
As a lawyer, arguing such an absurdity before a judges over a long term adult marriage with children is unsustainable.
It is no differnt than states allowing recognition of common law marriage that is not recognized or created in state. For example, FL outlawed common law marriage in the early 1970’s. HOWEVER, it DOES have Full Faith and Credit for the remaining out of state common law marriage creation despite the policy against creation of common law marriage in the state.
Like LA, they created a grandfather provision.
Homosexual Marriage mandate a Federal Constitutional Amendment. If we do not do one, Ruth Bader Ginsberg will do one for you.