I prefer to examine data before forming a full opinion, for which I don't have time here. Lacking that, I have confidence in my friend, a Utah mining geologist with forty years experience, who offered an alternative hypothesis with supporting data, and who stated flatly that the Richter magnitude of the event is far beyond that of a mining collapse. So, my predisposition is to believe it likely that the source of the event was seismic, but I don't have a final opinion. I do know for certain that the "expert" Fox News presented offered "facts," so basic and so erroneous as to render his opinion highly suspect. I have said nothing about a "conspiracy," only that said "expert" is rendered incompetent by his own words.
Neither do I even presume anonymity, seeing as my page here links my site with my name on it. That you were too lazy to check, which speaks volumes about the integrity and technical validity of your opinion in this instance.
Frankly, in my judgment, your tone on this thread constitutes an abuse of this forum.
I didn’t post anything about anonymity to you! It was to another poster. Again, this whole conversation was directed at someone who claimed that the Government is covering up the quake for some reason. You decided to jump in with anecdotal evidence, which does nothing to lead me to believe in a conspiracy.