Skip to comments.
Romney to Cut Embryonic Stem Cell Investments After Press Discovery
LifeSite.net ^
| August 17, 2007
| Elizabeth O'Brien
Posted on 08/17/2007 10:41:28 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
BOSTON - After a recent discovery by the press, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney appears to be pulling out his investments from two companies that use embryonic stem cell research. The discovery of his investments may have a negative effect on voters who already have doubts over the statesman's inconsistent record on life issues.
Members of the press and campaign opposition recently examined a federal financial statement and found that Romney owns stocks in Novo Nordisk and Millipore Corporation, two companies that use embryonic stem cells in their research, the Boston Herald Reports. Since the discovery was made public, Romney has stated that his investments will likely change to support his views.
"The trustee of the blind trust has said publicly that he will endeavour to make my investments conform with my positions, and I am confident that he will," said Romney. The former Massachusetts governor defended himself by saying that his investments were held in a blind trust which made him unable to specifically direct his funds. To some, however, this justification rings hollow in light of the fact that in 1994, he criticised Senator Edward M. Kennedy for the very same defense during the U.S. Senate campaign.
"The blind trust is an age-old ruse," Romney was quoted as saying at the time, the Herald reports. "You give a blind trust rules. You can say to a blind trust, don't invest in properties which would be in conflict of interest or where the seller might think they're going to get an advantage from me."
According to Romney's trust manager Brad Malt, of the law firm Ropes & Gray, the former governor took none of these precautions when the trust was established in 2002. Nevertheless, Malt also stated that it was impossible for Romney to predict where his money would go, for he "lost that ability once the trust was created."
According to the Herald, Romney owns between $190 and $250 million worth of assets. Out of this, he has between $100,000 and $250,000 invested in Novo Nordisk. On its official website, however, the company clearly states its support of embryonic stem cell research. (Read the Novo Nordisk statements on embryonic stem cell research: http://www.novonordisk.com/science/bioethics/stem_cell_ethic...).
Romney also invested in the Massachussetts-based Millipore Corporation, another company that uses embryonic stems cells for research. (See the Millipore website: http://www.millipore.com/corporate/pressroom.nsf/docs/73alx3).
Despite the fact that Romney appears to be pulling out of the problematic companies, the discovery of his these investments may shake the faith of conservative voters, especially since Romney's past record on life issues has been a slippery see-saw.
Ten years after declaring himself pro-choice, the former governor stated in 2004 that he had a pro-life conversion while discussing the very issue of embryonic stem cell research. He said, "It hit me very hard that we had so cheapened the value of human life in a Roe v. Wade environment that it was important to stand for the dignity of human life." Nevertheless, the recent discovery may once again have people questioning his motives and the reliability of such conservative claims during his run as presidential candidate.
Interestingly enough, however, it has also recently been discovered that the fiercely pro-life Senator Sam Brownback also had a much less sizeable amount of money invested in one of the same embryonic-stem-cell-using companies as Romney (Novo Nordisk), in the form of mutual funds. According to Brownback's financial disclosure records, he has between $1001 and $15000 invested in the mutual fund. Brownback's aides, however, have pointed out that in fact the fund is listed under one of Brownback's dependant children.
"The fund in question was not owned by Senator Brownback or his wife. It was owned by one of his children, who was unaware of the issue. The broker has already been contacted and instructed to sell the fund," said Brownback spokesman Brian Hart.
TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: romney; romneylegacy; stemcells
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
To: TAdams8591
I live in the Dallas/Ft Worth area and have to put up with that sycophant Mike Gallagher and his bigoted “questions”. Meanwhile, he sucks up to Fred as if it were the Second Coming.
To: JMack
"If he gets elected, Id expect the first four years to be spent like Clinton, immersed in polls, and feeling the wind. The second term is what is scary. Once he doesnt need any more votes, I think hed revert to his liberal roots, and make us long for the conservatism of Bushs immigration proposal."He didn't spend his governorship that way and thus it is unlikely he will spend a presidency that way.
As Ann Coulter said, Romney hoodwinked the Liberals in Mass. into voting for him. After all this hullabalooh, as president he will govern as both a social and fiscal conservative. Once Mitt turned right, he understood there was no turning back. It is highly doubtful during a second term he will make the same mistakes as President Bush, particularly if he is as concerned as you believe, with the polls.
42
posted on
08/18/2007 8:17:17 AM PDT
by
TAdams8591
( Guiliani is a Democrat in Republican drag. Mitt Romney for president in 2008! : ))
To: JMack
"If he gets elected, Id expect the first four years to be spent like Clinton, immersed in polls, and feeling the wind. The second term is what is scary. Once he doesnt need any more votes, I think hed revert to his liberal roots, and make us long for the conservatism of Bushs immigration proposal."He didn't spend his governorship that way and thus it is unlikely he will spend a presidency that way.
As Ann Coulter said, Romney hoodwinked the Liberals in Mass. into voting for him. After all this hullabalooh, as president he will govern as both a social and fiscal conservative. Once Mitt turned right, he understood there was no turning back. It is highly doubtful during a second term he will make the same mistakes as President Bush, particularly if he is as concerned as you believe, with the polls.
43
posted on
08/18/2007 8:17:19 AM PDT
by
TAdams8591
( Guiliani is a Democrat in Republican drag. Mitt Romney for president in 2008! : ))
To: pacelvi
This is a meda hit against Republicans, as usual. Liberals hate turncoats. They had Romney in their back pocket for decades. Of course they're not going cut him any slack. Why are you surprised?
44
posted on
08/18/2007 8:18:42 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(States' rights don't trump God-given, unalienable rights...support the Reagan pro-life platform)
To: EternalVigilance
I find it curious those quotes do not offer any links to the source so the entire article can be read in context.
To: TAdams8591
"As Ann Coulter said, Romney hoodwinked the Liberals in Mass. into voting for him. After all this hullabalooh, as president he will govern as both a social and fiscal conservative." So essentially what Ann and you are saying is Romney was a fake and now we should trust him?
I don't put my faith in liars or frauds no matter how well they dance.
46
posted on
08/18/2007 8:25:08 AM PDT
by
#1CTYankee
(That's right, I have no proof. So what of it??)
To: asparagus
Fred is a good candidate, but he's no more conservative than Mitt, and certainly is no second coming. Fortunately for Fred, he was Senator in a conservative state, and likely ran to the right of his opinions in order to capture that seat.
Unlike Fred, Mitt is no Washington insider and he made his money in private enterprise, not as a Washington lobbyist. Governor Romney has far more executive experience, and a creative mind full of ideas that would be good for Washington. The fact that he is even more articulate than the great communicator himself, Ronald Reagan is also a plus. Conservatives should encourage Mitt to use those abilities, to educate and advance the conservative ideology, as Reagan so enthusiastically did.
I am sorry to hear Mike Gallagher is for Fred. He's on late in my area. I'll have to listen and give him a call.
47
posted on
08/18/2007 8:30:18 AM PDT
by
TAdams8591
( Guiliani is a Democrat in Republican drag. Mitt Romney for president in 2008! : ))
To: #1CTYankee
No. Ann was saying Romney's the real thing who duped the Liberals.
Personally, I believe Romney should have run as a conservative, emphasizing some issues more important and particular to Mass. over others, rather than running as more of a Liberal. Perhaps people who say he couldn't have won the governorship in Mass. that way are correct, but I'm not inclined to agree with them. Now he's having a difficult time trying to prove to his base he's not one of them, but one of us. It is a lesson not only for Governor Romney but for us all.
I do believe Romney is doing all the right things to overcome it, and believe eventually he will.
48
posted on
08/18/2007 8:41:16 AM PDT
by
TAdams8591
( Guiliani is a Democrat in Republican drag. Mitt Romney for president in 2008! : ))
To: #1CTYankee
"Now he's having a difficult time trying to prove to his base he's not one of them, but one of us. It is a lesson not only for Governor Romney but for us all.""Them" in the above sentence meaning LIBERALS.
49
posted on
08/18/2007 8:44:31 AM PDT
by
TAdams8591
( Guiliani is a Democrat in Republican drag. Mitt Romney for president in 2008! : ))
To: Lovebloggers
taxpayer funded abortions  we already have addressed that on another thread, which you refuse to respond to. You're out of touch. I've posted the proof many times here, including yesterday. Go to the CommonwealthCare state website and you will see that it provides abortions. It's an indisputable fact.
Implemented gay marriage? Â what in the blazes are you talking about?
He changed the marriage licences and told the justices of the peace they would be fired if they did not perform gay marriages...even though there is still, to this day, not a single law or constitutional provision that allows it, much less requires it.
As Judge Robert Bork said of the Goodridge decision that prompted Romney's perfidy, the whole thing was completely "...untethered to either the Massachusetts or United States Constitution."
And there is no doubt whatsoever that Mitt Romney used his exutive power to implement it.
signed weapons ban? Â oh yeah, when was that?
July 08, 2004
"Deadly assault weapons have no place in Massachusetts. These guns are not made for recreation or self-defense. They are instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people." - Mitt Romney
filled public schools with vilest homosexual propaganda? Â again, what in the blazes are you talking about?
Romney's Commission on Gay and Lesbian Youth used huge taxpayer funding to promote homosexuality in the public schools
- During most of Romney's term in office, there existed an agency called the Governor's Commission on Gay and Lesbian Youth. It was established before Romney came to power but it existed throughout his tenure. Even though he had legal control over this entity and the Commissioners served at his pleasure, he never dissolved the Commission, nor attempted to dictate who its members were, nor even restricted how it used its funding. Romney could have appointed pro-family people or representatives from ex-homosexual groups to serve on this Commission, but he never did.
- The Governor's Commission was perhaps the largest government-sanctioned promoter of the homosexual agenda to children in the United States. This entity spent millions of state tax dollars promoting the gay-lesbian-bisexual-transgender (GLBT) radicalism in Massachusetts schools by inundating them with GLBT speakers, presentations, films, books, parades, dances, posters, handouts, and help establishing GLBT clubs on campus. These events provided a model for homosexual activists around the country.
(Note: See entire section below - "Romney's Commission organized public gay 'Youth Pride Day' parades and 'transgender proms' which promote unhealthy and risky behavior.") - Instead of dissolving the Commission, Romney continued to fund it:
More recently Romney proposed allocating $250,000 for the Governor's Commission on Gay and Lesbian Youth for fiscal year 2006, twice what he proposed for FY05. The Legislature ultimately funded the commission at $250,000 for FY05, so Romney's proposal for next year amounts to level funding, and the proposal is still a far cry from $1.6 million the commission received in the mid-'90s before the state budget crisis. Yet as commission co-chair Kathleen Henry said, Romney could just as easily have dissolved the program. "We serve completely at the will of the governor," said Henry.
- Bay Windows 3/3/2005
- When Romney was criticized for Commission's funding, the homosexual activists came to his defense:
Kathleen Henry, chairwoman of the Governor's Commission on Gay and Lesbian Youth, defended Romney. Henry said the governor's fiscal 2006 budget plan included $250,000 for the commission, twice as much as he proposed spending in 2005. ''The fact that he doubled last year's [proposed budget allocation] this year is huge to us. It's really huge. It says to us clearly that he gets the service for what it really is," said Henry.
- Boston Globe 7/1/2005
- Twice after the Legislature approved funding for the Commission, Romney then appeased pro-family activists by vetoing it! However, since there are not enough Republicans to sustain vetoes, a veto is largely a charade, and the homosexual lobby was never seriously concerned when it happened. And Romney never put any effort into sustaining the vetoes. This enabled Romney to appear "pro-family," while the homosexuals still got their funding.
- When Romney vetoed money for his Governor's Commission, here's what he told the Boston Globe his reasons were (still pandering to the homosexual activists):
Romney said his vetoes were motivated by fiscal prudence, not opposition to the programs or presidential politics. Even with his vetoes, the state would spend more than $1 million on teen pregnancy prevention and $250,000 on the programs for gay and lesbian youth. . . [Romney said,] ''The work that they're doing to prevent suicide and prevent violence is important work, and we support the work which they're doing . . . [but] we didn't see a need to raise their budget by 40 percent."
- Boston Globe, 7/1/2005
- In May 2006, as he prepared his run for the presidency, MassResistance presented the Governor's office with shocking photographs of events and activities sponsored or organized by the Commission. A few days later, Romney announced his intention to dissolve the Commission. But within hours of that announcement, under pressure from the homosexual community, the Governor changed his mind. "We inundated him with outrage," one homosexual activist told the Boston Globe. So instead, the governor simply told the Commission members that it must focus on its "original mission" [which involves affirming homosexuality to children in the schools].
- Boston Globe, 5/12/2006 - In June 2006, fearful that a future Governor might dissolve the Governor's Commission for Gay and Lesbian Youth, homosexual activists in the Legislature slipped an item into the 2007 budget creating a much more powerful "Commission on Gay and Lesbian Youth" which is independent of control by the Governor. Under extreme pressure from pro-family activists Romney vetoed that line item, but he made no effort to sustain the veto (the effort to sustain it was led by a Democrat!) and the veto was overridden. At that point, Romney simply dissolved the old Governor's Commission because, he said, it was now "duplicative."
Governor's executive order.
Romney's Commission organized public gay "Youth Pride Day" parades and "transgender proms" which promote unhealthy and risky behavior
- The Governor's Commission on Gay and Lesbian Youth had no restrictions on the mixing of unscreened adult homosexuals and children. The Commission sponsored a "Youth Pride Parade" each year which features boys - some wearing women's clothes -- and adult homosexual activists.
Photos of this parade
Details of the homosexual youth group funded by Romney which organizes "Youth Pride" - Youth Pride Day ends with a "GLBT Prom" at Boston City Hall Plaza where children as young as middle school age are allowed to mingle with cruising homosexual adults. Perhaps Romney should have proclaimed this day "Pedophile Heaven Day." The prom is promoted by the Governor's Commission and sponsored by the Boston Alliance of Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Youth (BAGLY), a group that has promoted adult-child sex and has received funding from the Governor's Commission. (The executive director of BAGLY is a male-to-female transsexual.)
Photos of the prom and a flyer handed out by pedophiles seeking boys at that event.
Info on the BAGLY, pedophilia and its connection to the Commission
More info on BAGLY and its connection to the Commission
- This shocking and sad spectacle of promoting the homosexual lifestyle to youth continued right through 2006. On March 27, 2006, Romney's Commission on Gay and Lesbian Youth issued a statement on Romney's Governor's Commission letterhead stating, "There's no place like Youth Pride….In celebration of their lives and diversity, gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender and queer (GLBTQ) youth and their supporters [mostly adult homosexuals] will gather by the thousands to kick off Massachusetts' 12th annual Youth Pride on Saturday, May 13th at noon on Boston Common."
Press release from Governor's office on this event
Romney issues a proclamation celebrating gay "Youth Pride Day"
- In 2004, Romney issued an official state proclamation celebrating "Gay Youth Pride Day" even though there was no legal reason requiring him to do this. The proclamation proudly touted "landmark" gay rights legislation in Massachusetts and boasted of supporting "the Commonwealth's gay and lesbian youth through school-based and educational programs."
Proclamation from the Governor's office - Note by always using the phrase "gay and lesbian youth," Romney has accepted the dangerous myth that homosexuals are born that way despite zero evidence. He has also accepted the homosexual movement's propaganda that young teens can understand and "declare" themselves to be gay. The Proclamation also urges, "all citizens to take cognizance of this event and participate fittingly in its observance." So not only does Romney honor this shocking event promoting a dangerous and immoral lifestyle to children, but he wants the rest of the state to honor it as well!
Romney's Department of Education promotes the homosexual agenda
- Under Romney's leadership, the Massachusetts Department of Education (DOE) continued to be rabidly pro-homosexual. The Department's website is full of "How To" information for homosexual activists within the public schools. One document titled "10 Easy Steps to Starting a GSA [Gay/Straight Alliance]", advises organizers to "find a meeting spot that gives members a sense of security and privacy." Other documents discuss "coming out to friends and family." Many of the programs come under the name of "Safe Schools" or "Anti-Bullying" programs but the goal of these activities is to reassure children that "It's OK to be Gay." This is a horrible fraud perpetrated on children and nowhere on this website do they mention groups that counsel sexually confused youth, state that the behavior is reversible or even mention the names of ex-homosexual organizations. To see the DOE's pro-homosexual propaganda, go to the DOE website or go to these links on that website:
The Safe Schools Program for Gay & Lesbian Students
"Outright" pamphlet distributed to kids
How to start a Gay/Straight Alliance at school
Gay/Straight Alliance Student Guide
Gay/Straight Alliance resources page
- In conjunction with The Governor's Commission on Gay and Lesbian Youth, the DOE has worked hand and hand with the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) and Parents, Friends, and Families of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG) to sponsor radical pro-homosexual assemblies and workshops at public schools. Before Romney was elected, one such session was taped by pro-family activists at which presenters described to children how to engage in a highly dangerous homosexual activity called "fisting" which violated both health and obscenity codes. This received nationwide publicity. Despite this incident, the incoming Romney administration did nothing to institute new regulations to prevent such atrocities from happening again. Indeed, during Romney's tenure, the Commission and the DOE continued to work closely with GLSEN and PGLAG, organizations that distribute literature and books with highly inappropriate sexual themes including adult-children sex.
Full report on the "fisting" incident
Info on how GLSEN works with the Governor's Commission
How PFLAG promotes pedophilia - The DOE's "Youth Risk Behavior Survey", given to school children across the state in several grades, asks them if they are heterosexual, gay or lesbian, bisexual, or "not sure" and how frequently they engage in hetero and homosexual sex.
Info on 2005 Youth Risk Behavior Survey
- Romney's DOE has failed to properly enforce the state's Parental Notification Act, the parents' right to opt their children out of sex ed curricula, when school systems have claimed that the law's "human sexuality issues" phrase does not apply to homosexuality or transgender subject matter. This has caused enormous stresses for parents trying to uphold their own values, and has led to incidents such as in Lexington, where parent David Parker was arrested and spent a night in jail over the school's refusal to obey the notification law regarding his 6-year-old son in kindergarten. As there was no redress within the DOE, Parker ultimately initiated an expensive federal Civil Rights lawsuit which is still in process.
Information on the David Parker incident
Romney's Department of Public Health (DPH) cooperates with the homosexual activist movement
- Romney's Department of Public Health contributed to the The Little Black Book: Queer in the 21st Century, a shocking publication apparently in violation of obscenity codes. Distributed to middle-school and high-school students at a GLSEN conference at Brookline High School, it discussed highly dangerous homosexual practices such as fisting and what homosexuals call "water sports." To be more specific, here's one quote: "There is little risk of STD infection and no risk of HIV infection from playing with pee." Massachusetts physician John Diggs commented that this book is "alarming, disheartening, and medically unethical." It is clear that one of the major themes of Romney's DPH (including the outreach programs it supports for homosexual adults) is how to have homosexual sex "safely," a philosophy that in reality endangers the health of its own citizens.
Full report on Little Black Book
- After The Little Black Book attracted statewide and nationwide attention, Romney belatedly issued a statement that the book is "grossly inappropriate," but no DPH employees suffered any consequences, nor did this incident result in any restrictions on how the DPH spends its money. As usual, Romney's statement was just rhetoric.
- Romney's Director of the HIV/AIDS Bureau in the DPH, Kevin Cranston, is a long-time gay activist with no known medical training and was a co-founder of BAGLY (see above). Cranston fought compliance with the CDC's recommendation to track HIV-infected patients by name rather than anonymous ID numbers (as demanded by gay activists).
- Bay Windows, 2/9/2006 - The above stories should be considered in light of the Boston Globe's report that Romney keeps a tight rein on his DPH.
- Boston Globe, 9/10/2006
Romney opposed federal legislation that would stop public schools from promoting homosexuality
- When Romney was running against Sen. Ted Kennedy, Bay Windows asked him how he would have voted on an amendment to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act that would ban federal funds from public schools which are “encouraging or supporting homosexuality as a positive lifestyle alternative.” He answered:
"I would have opposed that amendment. I don’t think the federal government has any business dictating to local school boards what their curriculum or practices should be. I think that’s a dangerous precedent in general. I would have opposed that. It also grossly misunderstands the gay community by insinuating that there’s an attempt to proselytize a gay lifestyle on the part of the gay community. I think it’s wrong-headed and unfortunate and hurts the party by being identified with the Republican party."
- Bay Windows, 8/25/1994
Romney's Dept. of Social Services honors homosexual "married" couple as adoptive "Parents of the Year"
- The Massachusetts Department of Social Services (DSS), run by the Romney administration, honored a homosexual "married" couple (two men) as their adoptive "Parents of the Year" for 2006. The DSS has gained a reputation for being aggressively pro-homosexual over recent years. This incident sparked outrage across the country, but to our knowledge no policies or personnel at DSS were changed as a result.
- Waltham Daily News Tribune, 8/4/2006
The Mitt Romney Deception
50
posted on
08/18/2007 8:47:55 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(States' rights don't trump God-given, unalienable rights...support the Reagan pro-life platform)
To: Lovebloggers
LOL...it’s a mountain of evidence of Romney’s hard left record. No wonder Romney hacks want to try to kill the messenger.
51
posted on
08/18/2007 8:51:19 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(States' rights don't trump God-given, unalienable rights...support the Reagan pro-life platform)
Comment #52 Removed by Moderator
To: TAdams8591
Its good that Governor Romney discovered it and I admire him for doing the right thing. It isnt easy keeping track of ones investments, when one has as many as Mitt, even when one has a mind too. It isn't easy. Mitt's investments don't suggest anything near the hypocrisy of Senator Breck Girl.
53
posted on
08/18/2007 8:55:43 AM PDT
by
jimfree
(Freep and ye shall find.)
To: EternalVigilance
Again for those in the cheap seats, my post from another thread you ignored:
Commonwealth Care funds health insurance premiums for private health insurance carriers.
The private health insurance carrier pays for abortions.
Using this logic (which is tantamount to headline reading), then every single private health insurance plan paid for by the state for state employees that pays for abortions is taypayer-funded abortions. Every single year we bailed out hospitals for free care (which may have included abortions) given to uninsured MA residents is taxpayer-funded abortions.
Every candidate who is in Congress who voted for Medicare/Medicaid legislation voted for taxpayer-funded abortions.
FOIA request for info on how many abortions have been paid for is nice gossip rag level headline, but it will yield nothing as HIPAA will not allow private health insurance carriers to reveal that type of information to the state. So it is all a dog and pony show. As usual.
___________
You stated that Romney signed legislation banning assault weapons — still waiting for that proof (don’t exhaust yourself with the google, because he never did any such thing).
___________
Gay and Lesbian groups in high schools in MA? honestly, are you kidding me right now? That predates Romney http://www.doe.mass.edu/frameworks/health/1999/1099.pdf, and I honestly will pass on your little website as I have no desire to fact check the cherry picking of articles they present with no links.
To: EternalVigilance
You really should be more objective about your “sources.”
Indisputable facts my arse.
To: aMorePerfectUnion
Quite obviously these flacks for Mitt will ignore anything to defend this flippity flopping flunker from conservative principles. The arguments that Mitt cannot monitor or choose investments in a blind trust seems to be moot now that he has said he is dumping the stocks HE AND HIS WIFE purchased before dumping them into a blind trust which isn’t so blind after all. As Mitt’s reputation goes down, so goes the reputation of his blind sycophancy at FR.
56
posted on
08/18/2007 9:20:04 AM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(You've had life support. Promote life support for those in the womb.)
To: Lovebloggers
You stated that Romney signed legislation banning assault weapons still waiting for that proof (dont exhaust yourself with the google, because he never did any such thing). You are seriously deluded. Mitt signed a permanent AWB in Massachusetts, supported and supports a federal AWB, and says "assault weapons" should be banned because they're meant for killing people.
It's not some secret -- Mitt is very open about it.
If Mitt is proud of banning assault weapons, why would you deny it? This is the weird Mitt-worship mentality that infects too many of you people. It's some sort of Cult of Romney.
I honestly will pass on your little website as I have no desire to fact check
This is what always happens with the Mitt-worshipers. We provide links to the facts, you simply pretend the proof doesn't exist.
57
posted on
08/18/2007 9:24:59 AM PDT
by
JohnnyZ
(Romney : "not really trying to define what is technically amnesty. I'll let the lawyers decide.")
To: Lovebloggers
You remind me of a well-known movie scene...
Storm trooper: Let me see your identification.
Obi-Wan: [with a small wave of his hand] You don’t need to see his identification.
Storm trooper: We don’t need to see his identification.
Obi-Wan: These aren’t the droids you’re looking for.
Storm trooper: These aren’t the droids we’re looking for.
Obi-Wan: He can go about his business.
Storm trooper: You can go about your business.
Obi-Wan: Move along.
Storm trooper: Move along... move along.
Sorry, but “Lovebloggers” you’re no Obi-wan.
58
posted on
08/18/2007 9:27:00 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(States' rights don't trump God-given, unalienable rights...support the Reagan pro-life platform)
To: MHGinTN
I agree. This one has legs that Romney cannot run from.
Nail + Coffin = He’s done
59
posted on
08/18/2007 9:30:06 AM PDT
by
right wing
(The Drive-By Media Are Terrorists Too)
To: TAdams8591
"I do believe Romney is doing all the right things to overcome it, and believe eventually he will."Not with my vote, the platform he ran on was not as a conservative, why should we trust him now?
60
posted on
08/18/2007 9:38:33 AM PDT
by
#1CTYankee
(That's right, I have no proof. So what of it??)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson