Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/16/2007 6:51:14 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


NASA: http://spaceflight.nasa.gov


2 posted on 08/16/2007 6:51:28 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

I wouldn’t agree.


3 posted on 08/16/2007 6:58:20 PM PDT by wastedyears (Alright, hold tight, I'm a highway staaaaaaaaaaaaarrr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
But a Nobel Prize-winning physicist who served on the Columbia investigation board four years ago, Stanford University's Douglas Osheroff, questioned NASA's hesitancy to perform the repairs since they "can only increase their chances of making it down."

I don't see why NASA is going to invent a fix and not use it,"


Mr prize winning physicist apparently isn't trained in risk assessment. Unneeded spacewalks are an unnecessary risk to fix a tile in that area. After all, the loss of whole tiles on the underbelly of the shuttle were once common.
4 posted on 08/16/2007 6:58:24 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

I’ve got a bad feeling about this.


5 posted on 08/16/2007 7:00:21 PM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
Great. God help that Tom Jode sh*twagon get back safely. I’m still waiting to hear from NASA on who sabotaged the computer before launch.
9 posted on 08/16/2007 7:12:12 PM PDT by Jaysun (It's outlandishly inappropriate to suggest that I'm wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

I think they’re wrong!

I pray that I am!


10 posted on 08/16/2007 7:13:35 PM PDT by G Larry (Only strict constructionists on the Supreme Court!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

If this shuttle burns up on re-entry fire NASA executives and charge them with murder. How hard would it be to send them out to put that goo stuff in the hole? I know EVA’s are dangerous..but so is a ship coming in with damaged heat tiles.


11 posted on 08/16/2007 7:14:01 PM PDT by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

NASA cannot afford Space Shuttle repair costs. The administrators have spent their funds on bogus Global Warming research!


16 posted on 08/16/2007 7:26:40 PM PDT by ricks_place
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Aluminum melts at 1220 degrees F

The reentry temperatures to the bottom side of the shuttle exceeds 2000 degrees


18 posted on 08/16/2007 7:32:39 PM PDT by vigilante2 (Thank You Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Some of you know that I work at NASA. Marshal Space Flight Center in Huntsville.

Marshal is responsible for the External Tank, Boosters and the Engines.

First, the Tank Managers should have fixed this back in the 80’s when it was first found. THere are no excuses.

I was privy to a brief part of a conversation amongst the highest echelons of NASA management about this latest tile problem.

I wouldn’t want to be on that shuttle. I fear this is being addressed the same old NASA Management way.


30 posted on 08/16/2007 8:11:10 PM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

On a wing and a prayer?


32 posted on 08/16/2007 8:12:45 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Well, NASA wants to retire the shuttle anyway. If I were up there, I think I’d want a second opinion.


41 posted on 08/16/2007 9:15:29 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
Just damn.

How secure would you feel knowing that management was "cautiously optomistic" that you would survive your work day?

If I were up there and heard that phrase, I'd put my puckered lips between my knees, so's to be in the proper position when needed.

42 posted on 08/16/2007 9:44:04 PM PDT by diogenes ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Maybe they could leave half the astronauts on the station and just have the pilots bring it back.


43 posted on 08/16/2007 10:05:18 PM PDT by Fitzcarraldo (Skip the Moon, go for Mars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
The massive amount of data indicated Endeavour would suffer no serious structural damage during next week's re-entry.

assuming the tests reflected all conditions of the damage on the shuttle...a dangerous assumption

47 posted on 08/17/2007 6:28:04 AM PDT by Fitzcarraldo (Skip the Moon, go for Mars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Geez, I’d have them do the repair just for the psychological benefit to the crew and the value of doing a ‘dry run’ of the process, not to mention the CYA factor.


55 posted on 08/17/2007 1:48:49 PM PDT by Grig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

100% of the Shuttles that have crashed had women on board. This one does, too. Let’s get ready for another crispy re-entry over the southern US.


57 posted on 08/17/2007 2:16:14 PM PDT by CholeraJoe ("I shall need the clankers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson