Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Teacher317
>> Yeah, being in the top 2 in the polls without trying is a sure sign that he has no chance whatsoever. <<

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/01/08/president.2000/poll/

Thinking ahead to the year 2000, if you were asked to vote for a Republican nominee for president today, which of the following Republicans would you vote for?

1# George W. Bush 38%
2# Elizabeth Dole 26%
3# Dan Quayle 7%
4# Steve Forbes 5%
5# John McCain 4%
6# John Kasich 2%
7# Gary Bauer 2%
8# Bob Smith 1%

I tell you, Liddy Dole's stragedy of not actually announcing and flirting with the Presidency is BRILLANT! She's polling 2nd nationally without actually being in the race or telling people what she stands for. People are fed up with all these chauvinistic men running everywhere. Everyone LOVES Liddy the second they meet her! She looks sooooooo good and saavy and talented on TV that she will win the nomination by acclaimation! She WILL BE our next President in November 2000. People will study President Liddy's amazing non-candidate winning stradegy for years in political textbooks.

174 posted on 08/16/2007 2:59:47 PM PDT by BillyBoy (FACT: Governors WIN. Senators DON'T. Support the RIGHT Thompson in '08: www.tommy2008.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: BillyBoy
1# George W. Bush 38%
2# Elizabeth Dole 26%
3# Dan Quayle 7%
4# Steve Forbes 5%
5# John McCain 4%
6# John Kasich 2%
7# Gary Bauer 2%
8# Bob Smith 1%

Ouch, what a sorry bunch that was in 2000. We are complaining about the field we have now, but the field is much better than 2000's.

177 posted on 08/16/2007 3:12:24 PM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson