Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman

Biologists have *two* mutually exclusive definitions of speciations: any change or the inability to cross-breed.

As for inability, there is a grand difference between lack of desire from that of lack of capability.

That the same salamander “can’t” breed with the same salamander but of a different color is preposterous. That one color salamander wouldn’t *want* to breed with the same species in a different color is far more plausible.

Some white guys don’t fancy black girls. No big deal. But they *could* breed with black girls. Big difference between “don’t want to” from that of “can’t do it physically.”


32 posted on 08/16/2007 8:13:15 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Southack
You posted:

For that matter, even the “isolation leads to speciation” theory fails...

I pointed out examples where that is not correct.

Your counter-arguments (i.e., "there is a grand difference between lack of desire from that of lack of capability") do not change the fact that interbreeding does not occur at the endpoints of ring species.

In these cases, isolation has indeed led to speciation. No theory needed, just observation.

33 posted on 08/16/2007 8:24:58 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson