To: dynachrome
I say no to a new govt bureaucracy.How are they creating a new government bureaucracy? Looks to me like they are just using civil litigation to fight pornography.
To: McGarnickle; LightedCandle
“How are they creating a new government bureaucracy”
You are correct, I read too fast. LightedCandle, have at it!
16 posted on
08/15/2007 2:26:54 PM PDT by
dynachrome
(Henry Bowman is right.)
To: McGarnickle; driftdiver; LightedCandle; GulfBreeze; Gabz; traviskicks
"How are they creating a new government bureaucracy? Looks to me like they are just using civil litigation to fight pornography." The same sort of "Legislation through the Courts" and "Judicial Activism" that is decried so forcefully here when it is practiced by the Left (Roe v Wade or Kelo v City of New London, are two prominant examples) ....
but it's ok if the Bench legislates YOUR morality???
what a crock, raise your own kids and family, keep yourself and the Govt away from me and mine ...
Ping to Nanny State and Libertarian
29 posted on
08/15/2007 3:00:22 PM PDT by
SubGeniusX
($29.95 Guarantees Your Salvation!!! Or TRIPLE Your Money Back!!!)
To: McGarnickle
The Left... the ACLU has employed civil litigation for decades to move our Judeo-Christian heritage to the social margins. The LCS would simply be using the same tools to revitalize the traditional values of our society.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
212 posted on
08/16/2007 3:44:04 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson