Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Legal overview: Plaintiff's case fails for a number of reasons

1. Plaintiff would have to show actual monetary damages to receive a monetary award. She cannot show such damages. You can't recover for hurt feelings.

2. "Ho" has multiple meanings in popular Black culture, including whore, woman, girl, girlfriend, wife, former wife, etc. Imus only has to prove truth of one such definition as it applies to her. This kills the "slander per-se" argument.

3. Plaintiff is undoubtably a "public person." She would have to show actual malice, show proof that Imus made remark with intent to damage her. She cannot, by a long shot.

4. Program is filled with satire and as such saterical comments are protected. Did anyone really think Imus was calling any of these women a "whore", a prostitute. Has anyone actually seriously offered her money or something of value for a sex act solely as a result of Imus' comments.

It's all BS. Lawyers looking for a little publicity, perhaps a fright settlement.

1 posted on 08/14/2007 7:47:18 PM PDT by MindBender26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MindBender26

They are just hoping Don will settle quickly by giving them their fair share of his $20M settlement. After all, without them, he’d still have to work for it ;-)


2 posted on 08/14/2007 7:49:03 PM PDT by PajamaTruthMafia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

Thanks to John Edwards type lawyers we are becoming a nation of pansies. Coffee too hot? Sue. Dry cleaning lost? Sue. Somebody hurts your feelings? Sue.


4 posted on 08/14/2007 8:02:17 PM PDT by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

Stepping down from the moral highground, all for the cashish.


5 posted on 08/14/2007 8:04:00 PM PDT by ARE SOLE (Agents Ramos and Campean are in prison at this very moment..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

And so it begins ! This country has gone absolutely nuts !


7 posted on 08/14/2007 8:12:30 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

8 posted on 08/14/2007 8:18:37 PM PDT by JOE6PAK (blithering intellectual.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26
"This is a lawsuit in order to restore the good name and reputation of my client, Kia Vaughn," said her attorney, Richard Ancowitz

Yeah, it has nothing to do with him making money.

9 posted on 08/14/2007 8:30:21 PM PDT by hometoroost (TSA = Thousands Standing Around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

She might also be asked what she has been called on the basketball court and why she didn’t sue for defamation.


10 posted on 08/14/2007 8:32:07 PM PDT by pierstroll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

This story was already posted a long time ago man.


11 posted on 08/14/2007 8:32:16 PM PDT by Fast Ed97
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26
If Imus has any brains, he'd take his 20 million and retire to Tahiti...after all, isn't he 65 already?

I never cared for him much anyway.
13 posted on 08/14/2007 8:34:55 PM PDT by FrankR (FredHead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26
Kia? Was she named after the car, or is that where she was conceived?
14 posted on 08/14/2007 8:35:43 PM PDT by BigCinBigD (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

Girl fight!


16 posted on 08/14/2007 9:19:40 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

Don Imus reportedly replied to the news of this lawsuit by saying:

“Well, it took the nappy-headed ho long enough to figure out that she might get some money out of this deal?”


18 posted on 08/14/2007 10:35:30 PM PDT by no dems (Dear God, how long are you going to let Ted Kennedy, Robert Byrd and John Conyers live?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26
"This is a lawsuit in order to restore the good name and reputation of my client, Kia Vaughn," said her attorney, Richard Ancowitz, in an exclusive interview with the ABC News Law & Justice Unit.

One word: Who?

19 posted on 08/15/2007 3:15:56 AM PDT by Dahoser (America's great untapped alternative energy source: The Founding Fathers spinning in their graves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

Paid for by John Edwards for President.


21 posted on 08/15/2007 3:32:25 AM PDT by sono (“This concludes our coverage.” Finally, Overbite speaks sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

I wonder when the Texas players will sue Imus because he said they are cute.


23 posted on 08/15/2007 4:23:14 AM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

Where do they go to get their reputations back???

They can’t go anywhere, because they destroyed their reputations themselves with their childish “victim” reaction to Imus’ comments. More examples of people who play the victim routine and look to others for the blame and the remedy.


25 posted on 08/15/2007 7:18:51 AM PDT by ShakeSpear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26
"This is a lawsuit in order to restore the good name and reputation of my client, Kia Vaughn," said her attorney, Richard Ancowitz, in an exclusive interview with the ABC News Law & Justice Unit.

Because Imus is Imus and known for parodying all manner of public figures, her good name and reputation were never in jeopardy until the slip, trip and fall lawyer highlighted her and made HER the issue instead of Imus.

26 posted on 08/15/2007 10:37:25 AM PDT by CedarDave (Vietnam vet supporting today's freedom fighting men and women and their families.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

Walk out on any street in any city in America (other than her hometown) with her picture and ask people to identify her. Not only will they not be able to associate her with the Don Assmus insult, they won’t even know who she is.

It cannot have damaged her if nobody knows who she is.


30 posted on 08/15/2007 10:59:53 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom! Non-Sequitur = Pee Wee Herman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson