Skip to comments.
Eurocopter chopper has serious problems, Pentagon testers say
STAR-TELEGRAM ^
| 8/14/07
| Bob Cox
Posted on 08/14/2007 3:48:40 PM PDT by Dubya
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
But the aircraft cannot haul the desired loads at high altitude-hot day conditions and is too small or is not organized properly to allow a medical attendant to care for two critically ill patients on stretchers. It also said crew members, patients and passengers would become very uncomfortable due to the tightly sealed, but poorly air conditioned cabin
1
posted on
08/14/2007 3:48:41 PM PDT
by
Dubya
To: Dubya
And in other news today the Pentagon has ordered HumVees to be replaced with revised models of the Renault 10. /sarcasm
2
posted on
08/14/2007 4:03:28 PM PDT
by
cva66snipe
(Proud Partisan Constitution Supporting Conservative to which I make no apologies for nor back down)
Based on the MBB/Kawasaki BK 117

To: Dubya
Army officials did not return call seeking comment on the testing office report. Previously they said the UH-72 provided the most capability for the price.
In other words, the tests were fudged.
To: Dubya
Does the left hand know what the right hand is doing? Evidently, not.
5
posted on
08/14/2007 4:10:05 PM PDT
by
RobbyS
( CHIRHO)
To: Dubya
Nice.... I guess the Euros want to kill us too?
6
posted on
08/14/2007 4:23:08 PM PDT
by
TheBattman
(I've got TWO QUESTIONS for you....)
To: Dubya
You get what you pay for.
Ugly little things.
To: RobbyS
Previously they said the UH-72 provided the most capability for the price.
Even a moron knows that you get what you pay for, I mean what the American tax payers pay for weather it’s good or bad.
8
posted on
08/14/2007 4:27:28 PM PDT
by
chiefqc
To: Dubya
The Army never specified a requirement that the helicopter be suited to caring for two critically ill patients at the same time, Hutcherson said, something not even required by civil medical evacuation aircraft. Seems like a wierd comment to me. I would expect the military to have a higher need of evac services.
To: chiefqc
Sometimes you get less than what you pay for. More often than not, the military pays the price of a Porsche to get a Volkswagen bug.
10
posted on
08/14/2007 4:33:20 PM PDT
by
RobbyS
( CHIRHO)
To: Dubya
Why not just buy blackhawks?
This must be our token purchase from Europe.
11
posted on
08/14/2007 4:40:36 PM PDT
by
DesScorp
To: RobbyS
On the other hand, an elephant is a mouse designed to Army specs.
And it is afraid of mice.
12
posted on
08/14/2007 4:41:41 PM PDT
by
patton
(Congress would lose money running a brothel.)
To: Dubya
Well. you take bleed air from the compressor section of the engine to run the air conditioning, which will cool the cabin,
but, that reduces the power of the engines, so the hot day performance is worse.
13
posted on
08/14/2007 4:47:58 PM PDT
by
Ed Condon
(Wanted, newer tag line in good condition.)
To: DoughtyOne; Dubya
The Army never specified a requirement that the helicopter be suited to caring for two critically ill patients at the same time, Hutcherson said, something not even required by civil medical evacuation aircraft. I call b.s. on this one. Something that would require so much space in the bird is either obviously in the specification, or not in there. Someone is lying bigtime. This is not a simple misunderstanding. I say POLITICS got involved in this bid/award.
14
posted on
08/14/2007 4:58:31 PM PDT
by
Diplomat
To: Diplomat
I think your on target. It doesn’t seem all that unclear that a helicopter in a war zone would need to fly at altitude to avoid identifcation and hostile fire.
Course we are talking about the Frogs here. Grin...
To: DesScorp
Eurocopter is a division of EADS, which of course is the parent of Airbus, and Airbus Military, which has been making acquisitions to position itself to compete against Boeing for tanker (and likely other large logistics aircraft) contracts. This has been championed by the likes of John McCain, particularly during his hyper-self-righteous period of anger against Boeing.
To: Dubya
Why can’t we buy something made in the United States for once?
17
posted on
08/14/2007 5:12:30 PM PDT
by
liliesgrandpa
(The Republican Party - spineless!)
To: liliesgrandpa
18
posted on
08/14/2007 5:15:13 PM PDT
by
Dubya
(Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father,but by me)
To: Diplomat
I call b.s. on this one. Something that would require so much space in the bird is either obviously in the specification, or not in there. Someone is lying bigtime. This is not a simple misunderstanding. I say POLITICS got involved in this bid/award. They should have taken their medicine and bought Bell 430's. Holds two patients plus a trauma team. American designed, built, and American proven machine.
19
posted on
08/14/2007 5:16:04 PM PDT
by
cva66snipe
(Proud Partisan Constitution Supporting Conservative to which I make no apologies for nor back down)
To: cva66snipe
Holds two patients plus a trauma team. Paramedic and Flight nurse plus pilot and two patients and needed equipment.
20
posted on
08/14/2007 5:27:45 PM PDT
by
cva66snipe
(Proud Partisan Constitution Supporting Conservative to which I make no apologies for nor back down)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson