Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Drug cartel-terrorist ties known in 2001
The Washington Times ^ | August 14, 2007 | Sara A. Carter

Posted on 08/14/2007 8:37:56 AM PDT by Ooh-Ah

A former director of the Drug Enforcement Administration warned federal officials shortly after the September 11 attacks that violent drug cartels from Mexico were teaming with Muslim gangs to fund terrorist organizations overseas.

Asa Hutchinson, who also has been a Homeland Security undersecretary, said that in 2001, DEA agents uncovered the link between the drug cartels and terrorist groups but too few government officials listened.

"I think it's important to recognize that the link between terrorism and drug trafficking exists," said Mr. Hutchinson in a phone interview from Arkansas. "While we are fighting terrorists, we should not neglect our fight against drug traffickers. We shouldn't neglect it, because the link is there."

Last week, The Washington Times disclosed a confidential DEA report substantiating the link between Islamist sleeper cells in the U.S. and Mexican drug cartels. The report, which included several documented U.S. investigations into the terrorist/cartel connection, stated that Middle Eastern operatives funded terrorist groups with drug money linked to Mexican cartels.

Furthermore, the 2005 document suggests that some Islamist terrorists are disguising themselves as Hispanics.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Mexico; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2001; asahutchinson; dea; dhs; drugcartel; drugtrafficking; moneytrail; ramosandcompean; saraacarter; terrorism; waronterror

1 posted on 08/14/2007 8:38:05 AM PDT by Ooh-Ah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

Who need border control?


2 posted on 08/14/2007 8:40:48 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Confidence in Congress has hit an all-time low of 14%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

No one is serious about the WOT, no matter what they say, if they do not have as a top priority the complete control of our borders.


3 posted on 08/14/2007 8:41:04 AM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie
needs
4 posted on 08/14/2007 8:41:33 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Confidence in Congress has hit an all-time low of 14%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

“Islamic Terrorists and Mexican Drug Cartels...”

Duuuh, I once heard a DHS official going on and on about “Radical Muslims won’t do business with non Muslims” what a moron, there is cash and smugglign pipelines involved, and it’s Islamacist dogma that non muslims can be dealt with as long as it advances the cause of spreading Islam thorugh a peace treaty.


5 posted on 08/14/2007 8:41:44 AM PDT by padre35 (Conservative in Exile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

“Islamic Terrorists and Mexican Drug Cartels...”

Duuuh, I once heard a DHS official going on and on about “Radical Muslims won’t do business with non Muslims” what a moron, there is cash and smugglign pipelines involved, and it’s Islamacist dogma that non muslims can be dealt with as long as it advances the cause of spreading Islam thorugh a peace treaty.


6 posted on 08/14/2007 8:41:44 AM PDT by padre35 (Conservative in Exile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah
The desire of both groups it to get larger weapon. I do believe that Drug Cartels would love to get their hands on some Shoulder Launched Missiles to use against DEA Helicopters. The Muslim Terrorist would use the smugglers to get people and weapons in the U.S. It should more then justify a fence along the southern boarder.


7 posted on 08/14/2007 8:45:59 AM PDT by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat; Alouette; ExTexasRedhead; river rat; SJackson; blam; Liz; Tailgunner Joe; metmom

This is DAMNED scary.


8 posted on 08/14/2007 9:23:06 AM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Illegal aliens commit crimes that Americans won't commit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah
Afghanistan, he said, may be one of the most obvious examples of narcotics profits funding terrorist groups, particularly the Taliban militia that harbored Osama bin Laden before the September 11 attacks. According to the U.N. World Drug Report for 2007, which was issued last month, Afghanistan is responsible for 92 percent of the opium produced in the world last year.

"Wherever you look globally, you see extremist groups benefiting from drug trafficking," he said. "You see the Taliban benefiting from opium. We see money coming from drug trafficking in the United States making its way back to terrorist groups overseas."

Here is a blatant lie coming from our government...The Taliban had virtually eliminated poppy growing in Afghanistan while they ruled.

Despite its own figures showing the Taleban had cut Afghanistan's heroin production by about 95%, the report claimed that heroin had "financed the former Taleban regime". The UN International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) report, released on 26 February, said that Afghanistan produced 3,400 tonnes last year, up from 185 tonnes in 2001.

While the US report praised US-backed Afghan president Hamid Karzai for the measures he has introduced to cut heroin production, the UN report said his two executive orders had no practical impact.

HEROIN production in Afghanistan has soared by up to 1400 per cent since the war on terror and the fall of the Taliban, a drugs conference will hear today.

The United Nations Drug Control Programme estimates the "total likely yield" of this year’s opium poppy crop will be between 1900 and 2700 metric tons, compared with 185 tons last year.

Afghanistan’s vast opium poppy harvest is said to account for 90 per cent of the highly-addictive drug sold on Britain’s streets.

The collapse of the Taliban triggered the massive rise because poppy growing was banned by the regime in July 2000, leading to a fall of 95 per cent in the size of last year’s crop.

Nobody fights a drug war as hard as rigid religious ideologues. I guess be-headings are a great deterrent to growing unapproved crops. Do these government mouthpieces really think our memories are that short. Osama and the Taliban are financed through Saudi Arabia with money we pay for oil....not drugs.

9 posted on 08/14/2007 9:29:47 AM PDT by KDD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KDD; Joe Boucher

Still, the fact that South American drug cartels are teaming up with Islamic terrorists is something to be alarmed about.


10 posted on 08/14/2007 9:31:33 AM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Illegal aliens commit crimes that Americans won't commit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
South American drug cartels want nothing to do with crazy extremist religious nutcases...Bad for business. That is why the supposed link is so tenuous as to be non existant. The Cartels are not political extremists much less religion of peacenuts. Peru might be the exception but I can’t imagine an alliance between the Taleban and Shining Path...In Columbia there is a chance that the militarized U.S. war on drugs in that country could force the Cartels into the arms of the Marxist guerrilla movement there.
11 posted on 08/14/2007 9:45:51 AM PDT by KDD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

Of course - and Bush just open the gates wide on our southern borders.


12 posted on 08/14/2007 9:50:45 AM PDT by LM_Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

So the failed war on some drugs is funding terrorists as well as destroying the Constitution. Big surprise there.


13 posted on 08/14/2007 9:52:08 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

Remember the grief the government got over the ads against drugs after 9-11 which suggested you were supporting terrorism by buying drugs?


14 posted on 08/14/2007 10:07:33 AM PDT by Ooh-Ah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah
I remember.

The government has wanted to use the broad anti-terrorism tools on regular crime since they were written into law. "Drugs" are the stepping stone to do so. In ten years, the "patriot" act will be used for most kinds of crimes, as rico is now used for pretty much everything.

That's why power grabs by fedgov should never be supported.
15 posted on 08/14/2007 10:11:54 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

Yeah, the ONDCP spent some 30 million of our tax dollars to make television ads that were ridiculed...People seemed to view them as government propaganda. A drug policy built on the lies that the U.S. drug policy is built on tends to produce a cynical public. And that is a good thing.

This is what you are referring to:

http://www.narcoterror.org/ondcpads.htm


16 posted on 08/14/2007 10:18:20 AM PDT by KDD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Tis true.
However the drug cartels want us to continue as that way they get money.


17 posted on 08/14/2007 10:46:35 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (An enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton

If only someone could figure out a way to eliminate the drug cartels’ profits, then there would be no terrorist link.


18 posted on 08/14/2007 12:00:47 PM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson