Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A political primer
Townhall ^ | August 13, 2007 | Burt Prelutsky

Posted on 08/13/2007 12:29:17 PM PDT by oldtimer2

A political primer

By Burt Prelutsky

Monday, August 13, 2007

Nothing that I’ve written recently has stirred up the hornets quite as much as a piece in which I declared my support for Rudy Giuliani. I can’t say I was too shocked. After all, aside from religion and, in certain strange circles, TV soap operas, there’s little that Americans feel more passionately about than partisan politics.

Frankly, the only thing about the response that surprised me was that I was mainly raked over the coals by Ron Paul’s disciples. I barely heard from Fred Thompson’s fans and not at all from Mitt Romney’s supporters. Make of that what you will.

The truth of the matter is that, aside from his coming across as the world’s biggest sourpuss, I really have nothing against Mr. Paul, except for the fact that he’d have no chance of defeating Sen. Clinton in 2008. The best he could do is be a third party spoiler in the tradition of Ross Perot and Ralph Nader, thus ensuring that Hillary would get to move back into the White House and once again train all the mirrors to assure her that she’s the fairest of them all.

When I stated my preference for Mr. Giuliani, I mentioned that I liked the way he spoke, I appreciated his forthright approach to Islamic fanaticism and his vow to appoint strict constructionists to the Supreme Court. What I neglected to point out is that he is a high profile personality who, unlike Ron Paul, might be able to raise the obscene amount of money required to run a successful presidential campaign. What’s more, unlike the other Republican hopefuls, he might actually be able to carry such Democratic strongholds as New York and New Jersey.

Ron Paul’s fans wanted to assure me that they would never lower themselves to vote for a social liberal like Giuliani. I found it odd that many of them didn’t seem to mind in the least lowering themselves to the gutter when sharing their opinion of Rudy and me. In fact, after I shared some of their more colorful comments with my wife, she said, “They make it sound like Giuliani is running an abortion clinic, and that you’re his nurse.”

What I should make clear is that when it comes to politicians -- even those I support -- I do not regard them as heroic figures. That sort of respect I reserve for firemen, cops and members of the military. The way I view our elected representatives is with an extremely jaundiced eye. I often find myself thinking that if only there were a way to turn all the stupidity, cowardice and hypocrisy, in Washington, D.C., into electrical power, Byrd, Biden, Boxer, Kennedy and Kerry, alone, could light up the eastern seaboard.

All I expect from a politician is that he and I see eye to eye on a few major issues, and that he or she can defeat the various Socialists, Communists and liberal pinheads, with a (D) after their name.

So, while I’m aware that Giuliani’s personal life hasn’t always been the model of probity and decorum, it doesn’t matter as much to me as it does to some others. The president isn’t my spiritual leader, and I’m not looking to marry him.

I think Al Capp pretty much summed up my attitude towards politicians years ago in “Li’l Abner.” A senator in the comic strip was facing certain defeat in an upcoming election until he thought to remind his constituents that if he won, he’d be going back to Washington and they wouldn’t see him for another six years, but if he lost, he’d be moving home to Dogpatch. The threat worked, and he won in a landslide.

Where politics and politicians are concerned, I believe that cynicism should always be the order of the day. Politics is the world of the possible, not the best possible world.

The way I see it, whoever runs against Hillary Clinton deserves to win. So far as I’m concerned, those Republicans who threaten to stay home on election day in 2008 if their personal favorite isn’t the nominee, just so they can self-righteously claim they didn’t violate their principles, are beneath contempt. Cutting off your nose to spite America is not commendable. It’s my conviction that anyone who permits this country to be saddled with a left-wing Medusa surrenders all claims of moral superiority.

In short, I am not one of those people who would care to have engraved on his tombstone: Here Lies Burt Prelutsky Who Never Voted for the Lesser of Two Evils.

W. Burt Prelutsky is an accomplished, well-rounded writer and author of Conservatives Are from Mars (Liberals Are from San Francisco)


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 08election
I expect this will bring out the "pure" Republicans
1 posted on 08/13/2007 12:29:18 PM PDT by oldtimer2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: oldtimer2; Politicalmom
Yes, like us FREDHEADS HUH?

Bump! IT'S FRED TIME!!

http://Vets4Fred.net It's time for Vets to sign up!

http://FredForPresident.com

2 posted on 08/13/2007 12:36:49 PM PDT by W04Man (I'm Now With Fred http://Vets4Fred.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldtimer2

I’ll start. Yes, Giuliani may be able to take some blue states, but if so many people already see Hillary as a problem, we will sacrifice a chance to put someone more authentic into the slot. I am also not buying his ‘strict constitutionalist’ BS. Be rest assured, if Hillary is the candidate (and I am thinking this is already a given based on her opponents on the RAT POTUS ledger), there will be solid money flowing into in GOP coffers. I just don’t think Rudy is guy we want calling the shots for conservatism...period.


3 posted on 08/13/2007 12:37:04 PM PDT by Amalie (FREEDOM had NEVER been another word for nothing left to lose...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldtimer2
“They make it sound like Giuliani is running an abortion clinic, and that you’re his nurse.”

That pretty well expresses my view of the Rudybots--may they perish in hell!

4 posted on 08/13/2007 12:39:28 PM PDT by madprof98 ("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldtimer2

So because Burt Prelutsky has lost his mind, gone to the darkside and now supports the liberal Rudy Giuliani, I’m suppose to follow in his footsteps.

Not on your life, Burt!


5 posted on 08/13/2007 12:42:28 PM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
...So because Burt Prelutsky supports the liberal Rudy Giuliani, I’m supposed to follow in his footsteps....

I'm not going to either. We need a real conservative; not another George Bush.

6 posted on 08/13/2007 12:46:17 PM PDT by GunsareOK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: oldtimer2

Good article, oldtimer2. BTTT


7 posted on 08/13/2007 12:48:43 PM PDT by Chena (If you're not fair and balanced it's highly possible that you're unbalanced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
That pretty well expresses my view of the Rudybots--may they perish in hell!

You sure know how to win voters over to your side!

8 posted on 08/13/2007 12:50:53 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Trails of troubles, roads of battle, paths of victory we shall walk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: W04Man
"an accomplished, well-rounded writer."

What a transparent egomaniac!

9 posted on 08/13/2007 12:50:57 PM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: oldtimer2

No biggy, he’ll support Fred when Rudy is...beatin’ in the primary.


10 posted on 08/13/2007 12:53:40 PM PDT by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldtimer2
I'd tend to agree with this article completely. The ideological Aryans might talk a big game now, but if they stay at home in November just because their favorite candidate couldn't muster more than 3% support -- as many of them are threatening to do -- then piss on 'em. I have my favored candidate, and I certainly hope he gets the nomination, but I'll support the nominee whomever it might be before I'll allow the election to go to an actual leftist without my having tried to prevent it.

As the author said, cutting off one's nose to spite the country isn't brave or principled. It's idiotic and self-centered to the max. It's the semi-adult version of "if I don't get to make the rules then I'm going to take my ball and go home". One can only hope the so-called purists will grow up before November 2008.

11 posted on 08/13/2007 1:00:07 PM PDT by Jokelahoma (Animal testing is a bad idea. They get all nervous and give wrong answers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jokelahoma
Oh, I should mention that no, I'm not a Rudy supporter. At least not until he actually wins the nomination.
12 posted on 08/13/2007 1:03:26 PM PDT by Jokelahoma (Animal testing is a bad idea. They get all nervous and give wrong answers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jokelahoma
If I had my way, to lead as a conservative, Brownback or Huckabee would be President. To maintain our country’s sovereignty, we need someone on the offensive against islamoterrorism, like Giuliani. I can be a Rudy supporter after he wins the nomination, or I can make him as strong as possible to beat the Hildebeast before the nomination.

I choose the former to protect my country, and I work harder at the local level to put my conservative principles into policies and actions.

And I promise to work as hard as possible to defeat Hillary, no matter who wins the Republican nomination.

13 posted on 08/13/2007 1:22:37 PM PDT by goteasier (At the core of modern liberalism is the spoiled child - miserable, ill-disciplined.... (PJ O'Rourke))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jokelahoma
Hear, hear! I made almost the exact same argument as Burt on a thread last week and got attacked for it in the same immature way by the ideological purists who'd rather sit home and fume or throw their votes away on a fringe candidate than vote to keep Hillary out. Rudy is not my chosen candidate, but as Ben Stein once said, "Any Republican is better than any Democrat," and if the choice is the lesser of two evils and one of them is Hillary, then it is your duty to your nation to vote for the lesser one. Letting her get into the White House with a Democrat Senate and several Supreme Court justices teetering on the edge of the grave is a recipe for a 40-year disaster from which this country might never recover. And if you fret that Rudy might not be anti-abortion enough, then you ain't seen nothin' yet. So do everything you can to insure your candidate gets the nomination, but once that's decided, suck it up, crawl over the broken glass and vote for anybody with an (R) after his name.

BTW, I also really appreciated the johnny-come-lately's who accused me of "spewing left-wing propaganda," considering I've been a Freeper since the '90s, my dad founded one of the first Republican parties in Texas and helped Phil Gramm get elected, my brother worked for the RNC in Washington for several years, and I was making every argument possible to try to convince them to keep Hillary out of the White House. Yeah, I'm a real liberal plant, all right.

14 posted on 08/13/2007 1:39:42 PM PDT by HHFi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: oldtimer2
All I expect from a politician is that he and I see eye to eye on a few major issues, and that he or she can defeat the various Socialists, Communists and liberal pinheads, with a (D) after their name.

That's how I see it too.

15 posted on 08/13/2007 1:48:53 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldtimer2

I will not vote for Rudy under any circumstances.


16 posted on 08/13/2007 2:03:26 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goteasier
Exactly. I have no problem whatsoever with anyone supporting whomever they wish in the primaries. Hell, that's what primaries are for. They can beg, plead, cajole, whatever they please to get people to support the candidate they see as the "right" choice. That's the way the process is supposed to work. If all their attempts to convince can't get their candidate past 3% in the polls, well, at least they tried.

However, once the primary process is completed and we have a nominee, it's suicidally stupid to pull the "purist" crap. If one supports (A) because they believe that person is better than (B), and (B) is considered slightly better than (C), yet (B) wins the party's nomination, just how insane is it to say "screw you all, since (A) didn't win, I'll not vote and let (Z) take the presidency. That'll teach you all a lesson!"? Childish, at best, and possibly dangerous.

17 posted on 08/13/2007 2:14:10 PM PDT by Jokelahoma (Animal testing is a bad idea. They get all nervous and give wrong answers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jokelahoma

I guess voting for Socialists rather than Communists is a great political priciple that conservatives should buy into.

Sorry, it is simply that if the only choice I have is between Rudy and Hildebeast, then voting no longer matters.


18 posted on 08/13/2007 2:24:43 PM PDT by TradicalRC (Let's make immigration Safe, Legal and Rare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jokelahoma

“The ideological Aryans “

Argumentum ad hitlerum.


19 posted on 08/13/2007 9:09:35 PM PDT by Pelham (theTerryAndersonShow.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson