Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DeaconBenjamin

Which is worse. Within India, they would have been under better control.


6 posted on 08/12/2007 7:17:18 AM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Gengis Khan

Perhaps. But having the festering sores as outsiders — “them” — can offer a unifying theme within (at least for those who identify more closely with the national identity than with the outsiders).


14 posted on 08/12/2007 1:04:07 PM PDT by DeaconBenjamin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Gengis Khan

Or India could be subject to even more islamofascist attacks, and have a Muslim minority trying to impose Sharia law in at least some states if not the entire country. (only around 3-5% of India is Muslim today; with Pakistan and Bangladesh’s populations added in, the percentage would be even higher (still less than 10%—the estimate for France—but still larger).


31 posted on 08/14/2007 1:04:57 AM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson