Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gengis Khan

“The Brits left behind a shitty legacy of what exactly not to do in Iraq.”

Uh, please expand... was the spin-off done poorly? Or the colonial “occupation” done poorly? or...???


10 posted on 08/12/2007 7:28:55 AM PDT by TWohlford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: TWohlford
“Uh, please expand... was the spin-off done poorly? Or the colonial “occupation” done poorly? or...???”

“Occupation done poorly”? You seem to have taken courses at some PC community college.

I was talking about “Partition”. Following the British example of breaking up a country would ensure perennial conflicts and bloodbath for generations to come. (Of course the Brit media spin doctors will always have you convinced otherwise).

17 posted on 08/13/2007 5:53:33 AM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: TWohlford
Much of Western Europe after World War 2 was practically forced to give European colonies their independence.

The Partition of India was very violent, and as the Europeans did elsewhere in the world, their formation of new countries was made hastily, and didn't take much into consideration ethnicities and tribes in the countries (i.e. putting tribal enemies into one country or splitting an ethnicity among several states). Europe had many poor 'spin-offs' which are still causing conflicts today.

30 posted on 08/14/2007 1:00:46 AM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson