[buckeye49]

I’ve read everything on FR about Duncan Hunter since Jan. I haven’t seen anything like what you have described. What you call “trashing” is merely pointing out their shortcomings, and emphasizing the REASONS we should support Duncan Hunter. If Mitt Romney didn’t want anyone discussing his flip flops, (on abortion, for example) then he shouldn’t have flip flopped!! Pointing out the truth is not trashing. If the truth hurts, so be it. We can be supremely confident that Duncan Hunter will not change his core beliefs just because it might get some more votes. I also read the Fred threads, and I say again, if the truth hurts, put some ice on it.

[counterpunch]

I’ve read everything on FR about Duncan Hunter since Jan. I haven’t seen anything like what you have described.

Perhaps you should read some threads about other candidates then, and see what the Hunter mob say about them, then. Most of the trashing happens there, not on Duncan Hunter threads.
 

What you call “trashing” is merely pointing out their shortcomings, and emphasizing the REASONS we should support Duncan Hunter.

How is questioning Rudy Giuliani's sexuality or Fred Thompson's character a genuine discussion of “shortcomings”? It's not, it's just trash talking.

Rarely do these comments even make mention of Duncan Hunter's merits. They're just hit and runs (but it's obvious the culprits are Hunterites by their taglines).

 

[Califreak]

We can be supremely confident that Duncan Hunter will not change his core beliefs just because it might get some more votes.

Another reason to vote for Duncan Hunter!