What is your point in spending so much time spamming a thread for the most conservative presidential candidate out there?Because the psychology of people like you fascinates me. You are impervious to reality.
Which RINO candidate are you a shill for sir/ma’am?The more important question is: whom will you support when Hunter inevitably drops out in the coming days or weeks?
Ah, you couldn’t even say which RINO you are supporting. lol
btw, are you depressed? I would imagine with all the naysaying you might be a depressed person.
The only thing that you are exposing is your own ignorance. The truth is that you don't know any of us and don't have a clue what motivates us. With every word you type, you expose yourself as being worthless trash whose opinion deserves no respect.
We need a president who is strong on stopping illegal immigration. We need a president who understands that the winner of every major war for the past 160 or so years has been the country with the stronger manufacturing base. We need a president who would see success in four years as people being less dependent on the government. Duncan Hunter is the candidate who best meets those needs. As long as he is in the race, I will support him in order to show support for his positions on those and other issues. The loss in Iowa likely means that he will not be president. I'm very discouraged about that outcome. However, supporting him is still the right thing to do because he is the right man for the job, so I will continue supporting him in spite of my being discouraged.
As far as attacking other candidates, many of us spend very little time attacking other candidates. I have attacked Rudy Giuliani and John McCain a great deal. Both of them are wrong for the presidency in every way. I could see voting for John McCain if necessary. I doubt that I would vote for Rudy Giuliani unless he made major, public reversals of some of the things that he's said. I've criticized Fred Thompson to some extent because he's not the conservative champion that many people are trying to portray. He's made bad votes for which he has no excuse. He's not been a particularly effective leader. His lobbying for a pro-abortion group shows a lack of principle on this issue. In spite of those things, I've also said that he could be a reasonably good president. I wouldn't volunteer for him, but I would likely vote for him. For the most part, I've tried to support Mitt Romney. I've criticized his position on the assault weapons ban, but I also see great potential for his presidency. If Mr. Hunter is either officially out of the race or mathematically eliminated when the primary comes to my state, I will likely volunteer for Mr. Romney's effort here.
Those of us who are supporting Mr. Hunter are doing what we believe to be right. The criticism of other candidates on these threads is generally light. Mostly, we speak our praise for Mr. Hunter and the good that he could do as president. We aren't trying to tear others down. We're trying to build our candidate up.
Unlike us, you are not obsessed with doing anything positive. You are obsessed only with criticism. In spite of your boasting about your self-imagined understanding, you are clearly less intelligent and less astute than almost anyone on these threads. You are trash. I am ashamed to think that you call yourself a Republican.
That's all.
>Will you continue throwing your salt, sabotaging, dividing, calling every one else “RINOs”. Will you go third party?<
As far as I can see, none of this is any of your business. I might ask you, who you are supporting in this race? And why did you consider it necessary to appoint yourself to “expose” us? LOL! What colossal conceit! Which is highly unusual for a paranoid type who always projects his own faults on others, but craves being the center of attention.