THIS IS AWESOME!!!!
While voters in Massachusetts won’t reject liberal politics, they might be willing to reject the person of John Kerry.
Too bad Beatty has no chance of winning.
That would be a double slap in the (long) face. But they have no problem re-electing der Schwimmer every six years...........
I'd love to see him in a debate with sKerry and watch sKerry explain how a couple grains of rice in his ass made him a "war hero."
I wonder what would have happened had Romney run for reelection in 2006 in preparation for a Senate run against Kerry in 2008. Had Romney been reelected and set his sights on Kerry, I assume that he would have a far better chance of unseating Kerry than would the less well known Beatty. Alas, his aspirations were elsewhere.
(DJ, I know you don’t like Romney, but I’m sure you would have been 100% behind him if he were running against Kerry. And, of course, had Romney run for reelection last year, he would not have done one of the things that makes you dislike him so much (abandoning the state GOP).
Head to Head Polling showed Kerry ahead of Beatty 58-23. The 48-45 statistic was a bio poll im afraid.
Add Teddy the Swimmer to that and it will be a win win for the American people and the country.
Calm down. Come crunch time I think the Democrats of Massachusetts will send Kerry back for another term.
A Republican hasn’t won the Senate race in Massachusetts since 1972 (same as New Jersey, excluding a brief 1982 appointment, and not counting the odious ‘94 Lautenberg-Chuck Haytaian race, which the latter probably won). Even under the most ideal of circumstances, when Reagan carried MA in 1984, we couldn’t get above 45% of the vote (Kerry’s first race against Ray Shamie). Weld couldn’t get as high a percentage of the vote as Shamie did, scoring just slightly below, when he ran in ‘96 (although he got a scant 3,000 more votes than Shamie).
Even against Kennedy, no Republican has reached that 45% mark in all of his runs, and the highest was George Cabot Lodge in 1962 when he scored just below that (like with Kerry, his first run was his lowest %). Romney placed 2nd to Lodge’s % in his ‘94 run in a low turnout election with 41% (he got only 10,000 more votes than future State Treasurer Joe Malone 6 years earlier, but Malone got only 34% of the vote).
I just don’t think it’s possible to win a Senate race in MA now, because we must not forget that the party there is DEAD. There is no real infrastructure, no GOTV, no nothing. We’re not really even in much of a position to exploit the weaknesses of Kerry of DeVal Patrick, because they may be withering on the vine, but there’s still life to them, and live beats dead.
If Romney had won reelection, I think if he decided to take on Kerry next year, he’d still have come up short — and I’ll bet he’d have been lucky to get 40% against him. Kerry’s sole vulnerability comes in the Dem primary, but fortunately for him, no Democrat incumbent Senator in MA has ever been defeated in a primary since popular elections began, and the last time a Dem incumbent Senator was beaten at all was when the liberal RINO Henry Cabot Lodge knocked off the aged Isolationist Catholic (and allegedly gay) FDR foe, Democrat David Walsh in 1946. Lodge was then, of course, in turn beaten by his more Conservative Dem opponent in 1952, a fella named John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
In any event, I think a Zogby special sauce poll showing a near-total unknown trailing Kerry by a few points should be taken with a grain of salt (why would an unknown be doing better than Kerry Healey ? That makes no sense right there).