[netmilsmom]

To: MountainFlower
>>While I know it got attention, there is one part of it that concerns me. Seeing gory graphic pictures of aborted babies may open the eyes of some people but what it does that is harmful is increases the pain, shame and guilt of those who are post-abortive. It forces them that much further away from the saving grace and healing they need. It also hurts those of us who have lost babies to still births, miscarriage or other ways... I am not sure that the gore of it needs to be part of the message. The message can still be conveyed without the gore of it all, and without the increased hurt to others.<<

Bears repeating.

83 posted on 08/10/2007 3:32:12 PM EDT by netmilsmom (To attack one section of Christianity in this day and age, is to waste time .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

[trisham]

It does bear repeating. Unfortunately, the message is lost on the ghouls who would have young children see those horrific images.

It's sad.

[Truthsearcher]

>The message can still be conveyed without the gore of it all

This is simply wishful thinking. The horror and evil of it is intrinsically tied in with the gore, when you take away the gore you are removing the horror, and that’s precisely why we’re at where we are, where people can pretend the 50 million dead babies doesn’t matter, because they aren’t horrified. If people were as horrified as they ought to be, the holocaust would end tomorrow.