Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

As Recess Begins, Spending Spree Continues[Ron Paul]
House.Gov ^ | 06 Aug 2007 | Ron Paul

Posted on 08/08/2007 9:26:00 AM PDT by BGHater

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 08/08/2007 9:26:03 AM PDT by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BGHater

According to the Houston Chronicle, Paul:

...leads the Houston-area delegation in the number of earmarks, or special funding requests, that he is seeking for his district. He is trying to nab public money for 65 projects, such as marketing wild shrimp and renovating the old movie theater in Edna that closed in 1977 — neither of which is envisioned in the Constitution as an essential government function.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/4935311.html


2 posted on 08/08/2007 9:27:55 AM PDT by bnelson44 (http://www.appealforcourage.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

(chuckle)

The Paulie Girls are gonna getcha for that.....


3 posted on 08/08/2007 9:29:29 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Here is a list of some of the pork that Paul has applied for. It is apparent that much of this has nothing to do with programs permitted, or mandated, by the Constitution. You figure out what clause of the Constitution enumerates the spending in question. I’m not an expert on the workings of Congress but reading through the funding requests I am under the impression that Paul was seeking multiple funding for some of these projects. I don’t know if this is cumulative, but that is the impression I got. Either way asking for it once is bad enough.

1. $25,000 for the Brazoria County Sheriff to establish a “Children’s Identification and Location Database.”

2. $8 million for the marketing of wild American shrimp.

3. $2.3 million for shrimp fishing research.

4. $3 million to “secure the acquisition of the McGinnes tract, protecting its critical natural resources and helping consolidate refuge inholdings.”

5. $5 million to expand the cancer center at Brazosport Hospital.

6. $200,000 for the Matagorda Episcopal Health Outreach Program to fund a “National Health Service Corp Scholar.”

7. $4.5 million to study the effects of the health risks of vanadium.

8. $3 million to test imported shrimp for antibiotics. (Does anyone think there is a big shrimp industry in Paul’s district?)

9. $10 million to repair the Galveston railways causeway bridge.

10. $1.18 million for “Personalized Medicine in Asthma”

11. $100,000 for a “data-driven automated system for nursing students on the Texas Gulf Coast.”

12. $257,000 to “prepare graduates from the doctoral program at the University of Texas Medical Branch School of Nursing to assume faculty roles in schools for nursing with a deficient number of doctoral level faculty.”

13. $1.4 million to buy buses for the Golden Crescent Regional Commission.

14. $2 million to buy buses for Galveston.

15. $5 million for highway spending.

16. $2 million to replace facilities for Galveston bus service.

17. $3 million to replace facilities for the Golden Crescent Regional bus facility.

18. $2 million to repair the Galveston trolley.

19. $2.14 million to renovate the Edna Theater.

20. $13 million for I-69 highway project.

21. $30 million the Texas Maritime Academy to refurbish a ship.

22. $4.5 million to maintain Cedar Bayou. Plus another $9 million

23. $15 million for “construction at GIWW Matagorda Bay.” Plus another $5.8 million

24. $100,000 to maintain Chocolate Bayou.

25. $2.5 million to maintain Double Bayou.

http://freestudents.blogspot.com/2007/07/ron-pauls-personal-pork-projects.html


4 posted on 08/08/2007 9:29:50 AM PDT by bnelson44 (http://www.appealforcourage.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
Ron Paul has earmarked $400 mil in pork and he’s complaining about spending in Washington.

Give me a break this little pip squeak Ross Perot wannabe is a joke.

The little man has a problem.

5 posted on 08/08/2007 9:30:05 AM PDT by BMC1 (ISLAM AND DEMOCRATS ARE THE ARMY OF SATAN. THEY ARE AL-MUFSIDOON (CRIMINALS BOUND FOR HELL.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BMC1

The neocons made him do it no doubt.


6 posted on 08/08/2007 9:31:18 AM PDT by bnelson44 (http://www.appealforcourage.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

No doubt. The guy gives me the creeps. I don’t know why anyone is paying attention to him.


7 posted on 08/08/2007 9:33:58 AM PDT by BMC1 (ISLAM AND DEMOCRATS ARE THE ARMY OF SATAN. THEY ARE AL-MUFSIDOON (CRIMINALS BOUND FOR HELL.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
I loved PJ O'Rourke's book, Parliament of Whores, of some years back. His conclusion was that our government is what it is because virtually no one is able resist the cookie jar. Seems true of R. Paul as well.
8 posted on 08/08/2007 9:42:35 AM PDT by RedRover (DefendOurMarines.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
You figure out what clause of the Constitution enumerates the spending in question.

And you'll get right back to us when you see he's

A) voted in the affirmative for any of the projects and
B) where it is in the Constitution he's not supposed to represent his constituency by passing along requests for the government's ear.

But keep on harping eh?

9 posted on 08/08/2007 9:52:25 AM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
Think the Paulistinians will show us the part of the Constitution dealing with earmarks?
10 posted on 08/08/2007 9:54:43 AM PDT by elizabetty (The funding dried up and I can no longer afford Tagline Messages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: billbears
B) where it is in the Constitution he's not supposed to represent his constituency by passing along requests for the government's ear

Are your seriously suggesting that it is okay to do everything NOT listed in the Constitution?
11 posted on 08/08/2007 9:58:25 AM PDT by elizabetty (The funding dried up and I can no longer afford Tagline Messages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

12 posted on 08/08/2007 9:59:55 AM PDT by Petronski (Just say no to Rudy McRomney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Wild Shrimp! (Ron Paul's take of Wild Thing)

Wild shrimp!
I am your pork pimp!
I'll make federal funds ... easy!
Wild shrimp!

Wild shrimp, I want to pimp you
But I gotta know for sure.
Will eight mil be enough?
You need it...

Wild shrimp!
My values go limp!
I'm just an earmark pimp
For my wild shrimp!

13 posted on 08/08/2007 10:02:49 AM PDT by dirtboy (Impeach Chertoff and Gonzales. We can't wait until 2009 for them to be gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Wild Shrimp: The Other Pork


14 posted on 08/08/2007 10:03:27 AM PDT by dirtboy (Impeach Chertoff and Gonzales. We can't wait until 2009 for them to be gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: billbears

Whether he votes for the bill or not makes no difference. A spending bill will pass with his pork on it. How stupid are you people?


15 posted on 08/08/2007 10:08:18 AM PDT by chesty_puller (70-73 USMC VietNam 75-79 US Army Wash DC....VietNam was safer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: elizabetty
Are your seriously suggesting that it is okay to do everything NOT listed in the Constitution?

No I am not. But people that seriously suggest a Representative's job is not to represent his constituents must believe the Constitution outlines a role for the Representative, other than to rubberstamp the administration's actions.

suggesting that it is okay to do everything NOT listed in the Constitution

On second thought, what does the 10th Amendment say? Although I realize early Republicans most of all hated that Amendment and did all they could to destroy.

16 posted on 08/08/2007 10:10:13 AM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: billbears
job is not to represent his constituents

What does 400 million is pork projects for special interest groups have to do representing his constituents?
17 posted on 08/08/2007 10:17:25 AM PDT by elizabetty (The funding dried up and I can no longer afford Tagline Messages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

No Blood for Shrimp!
Ron Paul serves the interests of Big Shrimp.


18 posted on 08/08/2007 10:18:17 AM PDT by SolidWood (UN delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: chesty_puller
Whether he votes for the bill or not makes no difference. A spending bill will pass with his pork on it. How stupid are you people?

You've got that completely backwards. Whether a congressman votes for or against the underlying spending bill makes all the difference...the earmarks are requested after the spending is authorized

19 posted on 08/08/2007 10:21:32 AM PDT by uxbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

If true, Paul is quite the porkster.


20 posted on 08/08/2007 10:22:04 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson