Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Says Iran-Supplied Bomb Is Killing More Troops in Iraq
New York Times ^ | August 8, 2007 | Michael R. Gordon

Posted on 08/07/2007 10:16:35 PM PDT by Doofer

BAGHDAD, Aug. 7 — Attacks on American-led forces using a lethal type of roadside bomb said to be supplied by Iran reached a new high in July, according to the American military. The devices, known as explosively formed penetrators, were used to carry out 99 attacks last month and accounted for a third of the combat deaths suffered by the American-led forces, according to American military officials. “July was an all-time high,” Lt. Gen. Raymond T. Odierno, the No. 2 commander in Iraq, said in an interview, referring to strikes with such devices. Such bombs, which fire a semi-molten copper slug that can penetrate the armor on a Humvee and are among the deadliest weapons used against American forces, are used almost exclusively by Shiite militants. American intelligence officials have presented evidence that the weapons come from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in Iran, although Tehran has repeatedly denied providing lethal assistance to Iraqi groups. In recent weeks, the American military has focused on mounting operations in sanctuaries used by Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia, a Sunni group that is predominately made up of Iraqis but has foreign leadership. But, as the information provided by General Odierno shows, Shiite militias remain a major long-term worry. In focusing on Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia, the American goal is to reduce the number of car bombings and spectacular suicide attacks that have aggravated sectarian tensions, encouraged Shiite retaliation and undermined efforts at political reconciliation. While the group is seen by the American military as the most serious near-term threat, there are other signs that Shiite militias remain active. According to General Odierno, the day-to-day commander of American troops in Iraq, Shiite militants carried out 73 percent of the attacks that killed or wounded American troops in Baghdad in July.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iran; iraq; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 08/07/2007 10:16:40 PM PDT by Doofer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

It’s about time that the Iranian leadership got their noses bloodied a bit in my opinion.


2 posted on 08/07/2007 10:19:25 PM PDT by Doofer (Fred Dalton Thompson For President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doofer
Iran is engaged in acts of war against the USA. Time to call in this game of poker. Let the chips fall where they may. Protect our soldiers.
3 posted on 08/07/2007 10:20:09 PM PDT by Candor7 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Baghdad_(1258))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

I’m with you guys. If Iran is intent on killing our soldiers (and they are), it’s high time we took military action against these mad mullahs. Enough already!


4 posted on 08/07/2007 10:26:46 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (My number one goal in life is to leave a bigger carbon footprint than Al Gore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Doofer

Amazing that we continue to let these acts go unpunished. I never would’ve imagined it after Bush’s speech to Congress shortly after 9/11.


5 posted on 08/07/2007 10:27:37 PM PDT by Azzurri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doofer

I dont know why they bother to keep pointing this out! Is our blood so cheap these days? Is looking at the pictures of our young dead soldiers that painless? Do something about it!


6 posted on 08/07/2007 10:28:44 PM PDT by blasater1960 (Rehavam Zeevi- HaShem Yikom Damo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doofer
"It’s about time that the Iranian leadership got their noses bloodied a bit in my opinion."

My thought, as well...

IMHO, every one of these we capture should be handed over to our SF troops -- to be set up on the routes the Iranian ayatollas/mullahs/Achmadummynutjob travel frequently. Better yet, I bet there are Iranian dissidents who would love to have them -- for the same purpose...

7 posted on 08/07/2007 10:28:55 PM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Azzurri
I never would’ve imagined it after Bush’s speech to Congress shortly after 9/11.

Bush has little or no capital left to start anything with Iran. They know that and that is why they are doing it. They never would have done this in 2003 or even 2004. But they smell blood in the water and are acting in their own best interest. They know it's just a matter of time before Bush is gone and the next president (R or D) will not want to spend all their political capital on waging this unpopular war and will look for the earliest exit. All they have to do is not poke the bear too egregiously but keep up the pressure to make this an unpopular war.

8 posted on 08/07/2007 10:34:46 PM PDT by Tennessean4Bush (An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds. A pessimist fears this is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tennessean4Bush
He's still supposed to be Commander In Chief.
9 posted on 08/07/2007 10:37:46 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Doofer
Attacks on American-led forces using a lethal type of roadside bomb said to be supplied by Iran reached a new high in July, according to the American military.

Ah HA! I have a great idea! Let's just sit back and continue to do nothing about it!

10 posted on 08/07/2007 10:39:15 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessean4Bush

They never would have done this in 2003 or even 2004.


The Iranians have been killing Americans for a quarter of a century. Bush didn’t do anything in his first year against them and he won’t now. Bush is the problem. He needs to put Iran back where they want to be... bombed into the 7th century.

Of course he would have to stop babying the Iraqs and turn our troops loose first... but that would go against his kinder gentler compassionate KGC warfighting.


11 posted on 08/07/2007 10:41:12 PM PDT by TomasUSMC ( FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Azzurri

The only thing I think Bush might be able to pull off is that if Petraeus convinces the public that he has us heading in the right direction and there is a light at the end of the tunnel. Al Qaeda is on the run and all but vanquished, etc. But, he adds, Iran has their fingerprints all over the missing last piece of the puzzle, per se, and is responsible for most of our young soldiers deaths, then I think their may exist in some moderate democrats (the one or two in Senate) and the balance of the pubs the will to punch Iran with a haymaker. Perhaps an embargo or a bombing of suspected nuclear sites and refineries that effectively cripples them economically and sets off an internal revolution to overthrow the nutjobs running that country. Of course, this has a high probability of backfiring by actually uniting the Iranians behind their nutjob leaders.


12 posted on 08/07/2007 10:41:44 PM PDT by Tennessean4Bush (An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds. A pessimist fears this is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Doofer

The scumbag Mullahs are conducting their own “surge” against us, trying to defeat us in US public opinion via the ‘Rats and MSM. They know that these weeks and months are crucial. If we didn’t have such treasonous weasels undermining us on the home front they would not dare to shed the blood of our people like this. It should be the end of Iran as a military power, but instead we have to make nice and follow the path set by our Congressional ‘rats.


13 posted on 08/07/2007 10:48:19 PM PDT by Enchante (Reid and Pelosi Defeatocrats: Surrender Now - Peace for Our Time!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Azzurri
They have been emboldened by the coward Democrats.
14 posted on 08/07/2007 10:48:59 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
If we didn’t have such treasonous weasels undermining us on the home front they would not dare to shed the blood of our people like this.

That is exactly the problem.  Why should they give up when the Democrats are cheering them on.  Democrats calling our soldiers murderers and thugs.

15 posted on 08/07/2007 10:57:17 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Doofer

This should have stopped a long time ago. It is time for Mr. Cruise Missile to visit the Mullahs. Take out their leadership now. If an American dies in a roadside bomb, they get a missile.


16 posted on 08/07/2007 11:00:08 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad; jveritas

Ping to article


17 posted on 08/07/2007 11:01:28 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tennessean4Bush; july4thfreedomfoundation; blasater1960
Bush has little or no capital left to start anything with Iran. They know that and that is why they are doing it.

That's exactly what's going to get mullahs in trouble. They are getting more brazen and transparent. Due to "no WMDs found in Iraq" and previous failures of CIA (real and imagined) and feeble attempts by Bush and his administration to properly explain what we have been and still are doing Iraq, people (and particularly, Congress) may not be too supportive of another military action against Iran's nuclear program and its potential for WMDs and undefined timeline.

However, the documented cases of acts of war by Iran against Iraqis and coalition forces in Iraq, and failure to stop them after several meetings and warnings face-to-face about the subject, will give us undeniable proof and casus belli, justification and pretext for military actions against Iran's military and nuclear installations inside Iran (which in turn will likely help provide a regime change).

Quad erat faciendum.

18 posted on 08/07/2007 11:03:56 PM PDT by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Doofer
Time to flatten Iran's gasoline refineries and blockade it's fuel imports as punishment for interfering in Iraq. We'll see how fractious they are when they're all walking and sitting in the dark. They just might get upset enough to do something about that mullah problem of theirs.

We may as well test out those new bunker busters that Northrup Grumman has developed for the B2 on all those nuclear sites, too.
19 posted on 08/08/2007 12:11:37 AM PDT by Sparticus (They're so open minded that their brains leaked out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doofer

WTF? It seems like we’re wasting a lot of time and lives trying to convince the idiotic left that Iran deserves to burn. Bomb them already.


20 posted on 08/08/2007 12:38:15 AM PDT by Jaysun (It's outlandishly inappropriate to suggest that I'm wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson