“You do not have the right to drive drunk, and endanger people’s lives.”
What power is the government using to regulate this?
“You don’t have to prove you’re innocent. You have to prove that you’re safe to drive. I hope that you can understand that distinction.”
In other words prove you are innocent. And thats not proving you are safe, its only proving the breathalyzer received a clean sample.
That's a strawman argument. I just said that you don't have to prove you're innocent. As I understand it, these interlock systems will not record the results or transmit them to law enforcement. So you don't have a leg to stand on when you whine about "proving you are innocent."