Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: driftdiver
In other words prove you are innocent.

That's a strawman argument. I just said that you don't have to prove you're innocent. As I understand it, these interlock systems will not record the results or transmit them to law enforcement. So you don't have a leg to stand on when you whine about "proving you are innocent."

108 posted on 08/07/2007 6:58:02 PM PDT by Bryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: Bryan

“That’s a strawman argument. I just said that you don’t have to prove you’re innocent. As I understand it, these interlock systems will not record the results or transmit them to law enforcement. So you don’t have a leg to stand on when you whine about “proving you are innocent.””

No whining here but your projection is interesting. Also, not naive enough to welcome infringement on my personal freedoms.

Perhaps they won’t transmit to LE on day one. I can easily see some control freak saying “why aren’t we sending these results to LE, these folks need to be verified before they drive.”


111 posted on 08/07/2007 7:09:15 PM PDT by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

To: Bryan
As I understand it, these interlock systems will not record the results or transmit them to law enforcement.

So, of course, it would not be illegal to disable or deceive the system, and police would be forbidden from searching for disabled systems.

You wouldn't have to prove your innocence to a mechanical extension of the local cop. And he won't stop you for just your seat belt, too, after all, he promised.

125 posted on 08/07/2007 7:28:54 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Zimbabwe, leftist success story, the envy of Venezuela)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson