Posted on 08/07/2007 3:47:44 PM PDT by TornadoAlley3
Science Daily — An analysis of Milwaukee County pharmacies shows that about half don't provide prescription labels and instructions in languages other than English, and almost two-thirds are unable to communicate to patients who don't speak English.
The study, included in the upcoming edition of Pediatrics, is unusual in that its lead author is a Medical College of Wisconsin 4th-year medical student. Michael Bradshaw worked with statistician Sandra Tomany-Korman under the direction of Glenn Flores, M. D., professor of pediatrics.
"Language barriers can have major adverse consequences in health care, but little is known about whether pharmacies provide adequate care to the 23 million Americans who have limited English proficiency (LEP).
This is the first study to evaluate pharmacies' ability to provide non-English-language prescription labels, information packets and verbal communication, and assess pharmacies' satisfaction with communication with their patients," according to Bradshaw.
Bradshaw and Tomany-Korman contacted pharmacists or pharmacy technicians at 175 Milwaukee County pharmacies, including those embedded within larger stores such as in supermarkets or retail stores. Some 128 pharmacies (73 percent) responded to the survey, and many indicated that they are dissatisfied with their communication with LEP patients.
"Our research findings suggest that many pharmacies may not provide adequate services to LEP patients, thereby limiting appropriate access to health care and increasing the risk of compromised patient safety," says Bradshaw.
The survey indicated that one in nine pharmacies that communicate verbally use patients' family members or friends to interpret, which actually increases the risk of communication errors and resulting medical errors and injury.
The study was able to identify "model" pharmacies that do have effective ways to communicate with LEP patients by hiring bilingual staff, using computer translating programs and incorporating telephone interpreting services.
Previous studies have documented that verbal counseling by pharmacists improves patient outcomes and is associated with greater patient satisfaction.
Realistically, however, the study may underestimate the problem, according to Bradshaw. About 16 percent of Milwaukee County residents speak a language other than English at home and seven percent have limited English proficiency, but the pharmacists reported a median of five percent of their patients speaking a language other than English at home and a median of three percent having LEP.
There are three potential reasons for the gap:
Pharmacists may underestimate the proportions of their patients who have LEP. Family members who pick up the prescriptions may be the English-proficient members of households, and pharmacists, therefore, may not have direct contact with many of their patients with LEP.
Patients with LEP get fewer prescriptions because they are more likely to have impaired access, no health insurance, or better health status.
"Either of the first two possibilities suggests that the problems documented in this study are more serious, because pharmacists are only aware of the 'tip of the iceberg' of language barriers among their patients. For example, if the pharmacist is not aware that many patients have LEP, then he or she might not even bother to print non-English-language labels or consider having translated information packets," according to Bradshaw.
Bradshaw suggests that pharmacies and prescription drug plans might want to consider their potential liability for harm to patients who misunderstand their prescriptions.
He also encourages clinics to alert pharmacies that the patient may not understand English. One final consideration is for governments to develop better standards of care for patients with LEP and improve access to bilingual/ multilingual materials.
The research was funded through a grant from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and conducted in conjunction with the Center for the Advancement of Underserved Children, a joint program of the Medical College and Children's Hospital, and the College's department of population health.
“Limited English Proficiency Barrier to Safe Prescription Use”
Translation from Yoda-speak:
“English to Use Limited Prescription Proficiency Barrier.”
And it is our problem, our fault. LEARN ENGLISH!
In otherwords if you have LEP then SUE your local pharmacy...
LEP??!...like is a damn disabilty?
*bangs head on keyboard*
The general standard in their courts is that you bring your own interpreter.
I would imagine it's the same in commerce ~ (slapping forehead ~ gee that was an obvious one) ~ and selling medicine is, at its root, a form of commerce.
Seems the US would be well advised to simply adopt the well-practiced Indian national standard.
Here’s my prescription and it’s in English.
Learn the damned language or pack up and skeedaddle.
This isn’t Mexico. It isn’t France. It isn’t anything but the United States where the citizens and those who actually aspire to become one learn “ENGLISH”!
Got LEP? Would surgery or a pill cure it?
Time to learn ENGLISH!
I’ve got the solution:
NO ENGLISH - NO PRESCRIPTION!
Which is why the Indians who work here learn the one common language that their Indian co-workers speak....English.
Still, my point was the Indian standard for a multi-culti-linguistic problem is for you, the customer, or the litigant, to BRING YOUR OWN TRANSLATOR.
They make no effort whatsoever to translate for the supplicant. The news piece we are discussing is about how English speakers can bow down and kiss the tush on every non-English speaker they encounter like they are supposed to be some kind of universal servant class.
Anyone living here should be prepared to speak English or find a translator who can help them. Ain't my job!
GO HOME!!!
How did our European forefathers make it in America without translators at the local pharmacy? They must have all died.
They are not Spanish only speakers-they are linguistically challenged. Add to the PC dictionary and apply for benefits tomorrow!
The only purpose of this is to open the door for a class action lawsuit. This is why we need an English-only law.
This is so incredibly stupid. Obviously some doctor was able to take a history and do a physical on these people to the degree that they could write a prescription for them. Anyone who comes to my office has a “right” to a translator so that things are explained to them in their own language. More often, the patient comes with someone who can translate. Is it the governments responsibility to come to the patients house and make sure they are taking their pills correctly? At some point people have to take responsibility for themselves.
In fact, I can use the internet to get just about anything translated ~ except Old West Gothic but that's coming!
Eventually, people will be provided a subcutaneous neurotransponder at their time of entry into this country. It will connect them to the Overmind which will provide them with all the meaningful answers (arrayed according to relevance from 1 to 100).
Undocumented tourists who have missed out on acquiring their subcutaneous neuraltransponders will, of course, be left to die in the streets.
Could be a rough place to live.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.