Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Translation: Nominate Rudy and lose, nominate Fred and win.

The "social conservatives" and "values voters" enthusiastically supported George Bush, simply because he met their two sole and exclusive criteria: no abortion, and allegedly "born again."

I hope we can find some more relevant and expansive criteria for 2008.

15 posted on 08/07/2007 4:58:43 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: angkor
You may be right, but to many Evangelicals, 'born again' translated to them (us) that this person was of strong moral, fiscal character & would adhere to principled decisions and govern accordingly.

Obviously now we find we were wrong on many levels concerning our perception of who we were voting into office.

We will be more astute, discerning and hopefully wiser next time, Lord willing.

18 posted on 08/07/2007 5:11:57 AM PDT by Guenevere (Duncan Hunter for President 2008!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: angkor
The "social conservatives" and "values voters" enthusiastically supported George Bush, simply because he met their two sole and exclusive criteria: no abortion, and allegedly "born again."

No, judges would be a big part of the criterion as well. And, that ONLY lasting and positive thing to come out of the Bush administration is strict Constitutionalists on SCOTUS.

Anyone not thinking that the nomination of judges isn't as important as any issue is a fool as is anyone that would trust a RINO like Guiliani to nominate such judges.

47 posted on 08/07/2007 6:52:36 AM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson