No, judges would be a big part of the criterion as well. And, that ONLY lasting and positive thing to come out of the Bush administration is strict Constitutionalists on SCOTUS.
Anyone not thinking that the nomination of judges isn't as important as any issue is a fool as is anyone that would trust a RINO like Guiliani to nominate such judges.
That's very disingenuous.
The only reason a "values voter" or "social conservative" would give a hoot about federal judges is due to their stand on abortion.
The "values voter" or "social conservative" is by definition a single-issue voter, which is abortion, though occasionally with some equivalent concerns about whether a Presidential candidate is "born again", and very often with an obsessive concern about a candidate's personal and private marital issues, including whether that candidate's wife has been photographed in public with her cleavage revealed.
"Values voters" and "social conservatives" frequently get so obsessed about an infracting candidate that they have and will literally rip the most scurrilous and mendacious libels from leftie and Socialist web sites and post it here on FR as truth. It doesn't matter how untrue that propaganda might be, so long as it creates a smokescreen for the "social conservative's" actual but hidden malice toward the candidate, in particular because of their self-constructed fantasies about the candidates personal and private marital life (which they actually know nothing about, though they'd never admit to that).