Posted on 08/07/2007 1:43:37 AM PDT by bruinbirdman
By picking a tough-minded outsider to head Chrysler, the struggling automaker's new owners have put company employees, suppliers and dealers on notice that things will be changing.
Cerberus Capital Management's founder Stephen Feinberg closed the $7.4 billion deal to buy Chrysler on Friday and this weekend put his guy in place at the top, installing former Home Depot Inc (HD.N) head Robert Nardelli as the automaker's CEO.
Nardelli's hiring comes at a critical time for the struggling U.S. automaker -- amid contract negotiations with the United Auto Workers union aimed at reducing hourly labor costs in areas such as health care.
"I think we need to be tighter on our purse strings," Larry Drake, who heads Kuka Flexible Production Systems, a Chrysler supplier, told an industry conference on Monday in Traverse City, Michigan. "I think that's where the changes will be."
Nardelli, a hard-driving former General Electric Co (GE.N) executive, was credited with revamping Home Depot's purchasing systems to save money, but then was widely criticized for a compensation package seen as excessive, including a $210 million severance deal when he left the company in January.
Chrysler's former CEO Tom LaSorda agreed to stay on as Nardelli's deputy and company president with responsibility for operations including a crucial, ongoing round of contract talks with the United Auto Workers union.
That structure gives Chrysler a "good cop" to face the union in LaSorda, with the "bad cop" of Nardelli, representing the financial interests of Cerberus, looming in the background, said David Cole, who heads the Center for Automotive Research.
"Obviously, he's Cerberus' watchdog," Cole said of Nardelli. "And it looks like Tom LaSorda is the guy who's going to run the company."
That dual structure could allow Chrysler management to press the UAW for concessions needed to cut costs, with the implicit threat that such a deal is needed to allow Cerberus to fund continued investment, Cole said.
Nardelli declined to discuss his pay package at the newly private Chrysler, saying only that it would be tied to progress in turning around Chrysler -- which lost $680 million last year and has had to rely on the most costly incentives in the industry to move vehicles this year.
PAY CONTROVERSY LINGERS
Nardelli's hiring could complicate negotiations with Chrysler's 43,000 UAW-represented factory workers, but some analysts said that without the constraints of being a public company, Cerberus will be better positioned to shake up an industry that lost over $15 billion last year.
"They may have reasoned that his hard-line approach to leadership is what's needed to turn around the struggling automaker," said John Challenger, chief executive officer of consulting firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas.
Peter Jankovskis, one of two chief investment officers at OakBrook Investments of Lisle, Illinois, said Nardelli's "blunt style" caused problems with shareholders at Home Depot, but could make him an appealing choice to run a private company.
Jankovskis, who owned Home Depot shares under Nardelli as well as stock in Chrysler rivals General Motors Corp (GM.N) and Ford Motor Co (F.N), said Nardelli could move for a faster restructuring of Chrysler.
"It could lead to some rationalization within Chrysler itself, not just cutting outside suppliers but paring back certain units of the company that may not be producing as much as he would like," he said.
Keith Davis, an analyst with Farr Miller Washington, which owned Home Depot shares during Nardelli's watch, also expects Nardelli to apply the cost-cutting skills honed at Home Depot.
"That's why I think he'll work out well at Chrysler or any manufacturing firm, because he's great at driving costs out of the system," he said.
However, Davis added, while Nardelli drove up Home Depot's margins, he also cut costs so much that some shoppers were driven to rival Lowe's. (LOW.N)
University of Maryland economist and commentator Peter Morici said Nardelli lacked the automotive background and deal-making skills to save Chrysler, especially given the pressure for new alliances to fund expensive development of hybrid engines and other technology.
"Nardelli is hardly a poster boy for corporate diplomacy," Morici wrote in a comment. "His tour of duty at Home Depot demonstrated that."
Nardelli came to Home Depot with much fanfare in December 2000, but quickly drew mixed reviews from workers used to the more free-wheeling management style of its founders.
Last year, the discontent swelled as investors questioned the size of his pay package and by refusing to take questions or review the company's performance at its annual meeting.
These issues won't be a problem for Nardelli at privately held Chrysler, however, analysts said.
"Despite the way his career ended at Home Depot, he's a great manager," said Richard Steinberg, president of a Florida asset management firm that owns GM bonds. "In a private environment, he's going to be able to do what he needs to ... without the microscope of the public entity."
Nardelli a cost-cutter? Heh.
Translation: "UAW, ... Kiss your ass goodbye!" .................. FRegards
“Nardelli a cost-cutter? Heh.”
Well, yea, he’s a cost cutter. He cut enough at HD to pay for his going away present.
Labor relations. heh. Tell me some more stories. :)
I just bought a Crossfire Roadster three months ago. I hop I can get parts.
Nardelli cut people at HD who knew something about what they were selling. People with seniority or managers who had compensation plans set up by the people who built the company got the axe.
My information comes from a high school buddy who used to work at HD. I don’t have a dog in this fight except that at one time a homeowner like me could go into HD and get some meaningful help from employees. Now? They’re across the street at Lowe’s.
IIRC Nardelli came in from some consulting firm like McKinsey or someplace. Those guys CANNOT run a company (except into the ground).
I guess you need to build a track record of incompetence if you want to be a CEO these days.
“amid contract negotiations with the United Auto Workers union aimed at reducing hourly labor costs in areas such as health care.”
It’s aimed at the health care costs for retirees. Before everyone begins slamming the retirees and UAW for their negotiated health benefits, I’d invite you to take a look at your city and states retirees.
The benefits for the retirees are from sales of vehicles and company profits over time.
The city and state retirees, especially in my area get comparable benefits, yes, almost the same as the UAW, but those are paid by YOUR property taxes.
~And every year, as the benefits rise, so do your taxes.
So, you can harp on the retirees benefits that will be slashed in any event that are paid for not out of your pocket but out of profits,
as
you are silent on the increased property and personal tax for city and state employees.
Yeah, looks like Nardelli will take all those cost savings and put them in his pay package.
Agreed. It is a proven fact that any executive who has a golden parachute waiting for him upon his termination from the company is not going to do a good job. To put it more bluntly, if you know you are going to walk away with $100 million or more no matter how much you screw up, then why bother doing a good job at all?
I bought my first and last Chrysler in the 90's. What a nightmare. Nardelli needs to focus on quality, not just cost cutting, or he will cost-cut Chrysler into bankruptcy.
This explains GM's terminal decline.
They’re going to start selling Chinese cars within the next few years. Quality obviously won’t be one of their criteria.
You're probably right. I just don't see Chrysler making it.
Word to Chrysler, GM, Ford....
While you were busy bleeding red, Toyota turned a record profit this past year (and quarter).
Take at look at their business model - see a difference?
Bob Nardelli at Cerberus will be interesting. Wonder what Jack Welch thought of Bigga Bob’s performance at The DEEP.
You should be fine... if the company is in business, by lay they HAVE to supply parts for a good number of years, I believe. For some reason I’m thinking its 15 years, but I’m not positive.
But outside of that, your car actually uses quite a lot of Mercedes components. So even if Chrysler went out of business completely and no parts supplier bought the equipment or rights to make replacement parts, you could get a lot of what you need from the local Mercedes dealer.
Did you get a good deal on the Crossfire? They’re absolute slugs when it comes to moving off the dealers lot, so they should be desperate to move anything. Almost two years ago, they had a 230 day supply on the lots, which is a horrid inventory level. They even started listing them on overstock.com to try to get rid of them. By 2006, they were up to nearly a year’s supply on the lots...
They certainly look nice, but were an absolute, unadulterated sales flop. I think Edsels were probably easier to move....
A huge difference is no UAW. A second difference is few retirees in the US. Toyota's profits would look a lot different if these factors were included. Chrysler cannot wish away either of these, regardless of its owners, or CEO's.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.