Trutheriness and Ron Paul (Michelle Malkin) [Ron Paul Says The Darnedest Things!]

Michelle Malkin ^ | May 19, 2007 | Michelle Malkin

[Lovebloggers]

CALLER: I want a complete, impartial, and totally independent investigation of the events of September 11, 2001 . I’m tired of this bogus garbage about terrorism. Ask Michael Meacher about how he feels about this bogus war on terrorism. Can you comment on that please?

HON. DR. RON PAUL: Well, that would be nice to have. Unfortunately, we don’t have that in place. IT WILL BE A LITTLE BIT BETTER NOW WITH THE DEMOCRATS NOW IN CHARGE OF OVERSIGHT. But you know, for top level policy there’s not a whole lot of difference between the two policies so a real investigation isn’t going to happen. But I think we have to keep pushing for it. And like you and others, we see the investigations that have been done so far as more or less cover-up and no real explanation of what went on.

[Dead Corpse]

More like “Bad Cop/Worse Cop”.

[Pyro7480]

From the Paulite Parallel Universe, I'm quite sure that's the way it appears.

FYI, I'm not a Paul supporter. I'm a friend of Maeve's, and I do not appreciate your malcontent.

[soccermom]

OK — so you’re saying you believe it was terrorists that carried out the 9/11 plots — just not the ones that were identified. So who do you think the terrorists were and why did the government misidentify them? Do you think the phone calls from the victims on the planes are real? Do you think the flight manifests were accurate? If not, who faked them?

[Maeve]

I’ve answered you.

[dirtboy]

I think it likely to be much more intricate than that.

So in other words, you are stating that there was an intricate plot in the government. Which directly contradicts this statement of yours:

Al-Qaida has many sources of help, but that aid need not have come from our own government.

So at the end of the day, you are as incoherent as any other Truther. And like any other Truther, Occam's Razor slits your throat when you try to use it.

[Pyro7480]

Man, you Paulites can be dense.

Projection on your part. Just because I defend my friend, I'm a Paulite? Ha!

[Lovebloggers]

No sport — she posted a link to another’s bloggers mp3 recording of your boy Ron on the truther’s radio show. You still haven’t commented on that.

Keep deflecting though.

[Xenalyte]

You should show courtesy to JimRob’s guests.

All of us are guests in his house, and he chooses whether or not to allow us in.

So far, he hasn’t kicked Maeve off, and you should defer to the host.

Once again, basic politeness. The GOP used to be proud of its grasp on manners.

[soccermom]

“Too many folk invoke Occam’s Razor without considering Semitic thinking.” Oh, mercy, are we back to blaming the joooooooos now?

[Lovebloggers]

It’s a saying actually, but keep this deflection up. Your deflection postwhoring has become an art form to you.

[dirtboy]

You must be real proud of the "arguments" you're making, that you can't even bear them to be read by the person who sparked them.

Sorry, but I couldn't give a rat's backside what a truther thinks. Or their defenders. Which means I no longer give a rat's backside what you think, either.

I've refrained from critizing the Paulites on FR. But this episode shows how pathetic a bunch y'all are. You twist clear concepts, defend trutherism, and decide critics cannot even use the own statements of Paulites against them in debate.

Enough time wasted with the likes of y'all. I'm sure there is a Paulite meet-up somewhere where you can go for more non-conforming conformist groupthink.

[Pyro7480]

“Too many folk invoke Occam’s Razor without considering Semitic thinking.” Oh, mercy, are we back to blaming the joooooooos now?

WHAT!?

[Xenalyte]

Good God, you can’t even READ.

>>Maeve: I think it likely to be much more intricate than that.<<

>>Dirtboy: So in other words, you are stating that there was an intricate plot in the government.<<

An honest person would admit that the word “intricate” doesn’t always apply to “government.”

It’d be nice if you took Maeve’s words at their face value, instead of reading crap like that into them.

[dirtboy]

You should show courtesy to JimRob’s guests.

I'll trash truthers all I friggin' want. After all, her truther post got the yank.

[Pyro7480]

Thank you for proving my point about you.

[dirtboy]

An honest person would admit that the word “intricate” doesn’t always apply to “government.”

Try to keep up. I mentioned folks in the FBI and CIA looking the other way. She said it was more intricate than that. IN OTHER WORDS, IT NEEDED MORE GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT.

It's pretty clear to everyone but the Paulite apologists what is being said here.

[Xenalyte]

You’ve refrained from criticizing us?

How would you characterize the name-calling you’ve engaged in all over this thread?

[Lovebloggers]

Bill Clinton: I did not have sex with that woman.

The matter is settled once and for all.

[soccermom]

Perhaps you should pose the “what” to Maeve.

[Maeve]

So who do you think the terrorists were and why did the government misidentify them? Do you think the phone calls from the victims on the planes are real? Do you think the flight manifests were accurate? If not, who faked them?

You ask good questions. I cannot answer them because a proper inquest has not been completed to answer those specific questions -- no matter how off the wall they may seem.

I do believe there is a Fifth Column in our government and I am not entirely certain to whom they answer.