Posted on 08/05/2007 5:34:39 PM PDT by Lovebloggers
CALLER: I want a complete, impartial, and totally independent investigation of the events of September 11, 2001 . I’m tired of this bogus garbage about terrorism. Ask Michael Meacher about how he feels about this bogus war on terrorism. Can you comment on that please?
HON. DR. RON PAUL: Well, that would be nice to have. Unfortunately, we don’t have that in place. IT WILL BE A LITTLE BIT BETTER NOW WITH THE DEMOCRATS NOW IN CHARGE OF OVERSIGHT. But you know, for top level policy there’s not a whole lot of difference between the two policies so a real investigation isn’t going to happen. But I think we have to keep pushing for it. And like you and others, we see the investigations that have been done so far as more or less cover-up and no real explanation of what went on.
(Excerpt) Read more at michellemalkin.com ...
Ron Paul on Fox Big Story Sunday August 5, 2007 Part One
Ron Paul on the Fox Big Story Sunday August 5, 2007
1980 Republican Party: Government isn't the solution, Government is the problem
2007 Republican Party: When people hurt, Government must act
Ron Paul is the only Reaganite in the race. It's time for real conservatives to take the party back. Gon Ron!
|
One post is “all over the place”?
|
See, I still don’t get that. That was the rational for voting for Bush in 2000. And what the dims did in 2004 (if Dean won the nomination - he would have won the presidency).
Thompson to me seems more of a Tabula Rosa, where we can project all our dreams onto him.
Reagan had a history of accomplishment to back up his personality. But Thompson just really doesn’t have it.
He could be just more Rino in a conservative’s clothing.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not willing to dismiss him at all, but I still need to hear what he has to say on the trail, in debates before I can make a judgement.
Oh I use the same commonsense approach I used to call Joycelyn Elders a dumbass.
Or is it your assertion that a medical degree is needed in order to pass judgement on someone from the medical community? A Law degree in order to pass judgement on someone from the legal community? A fat-ass, loserdopian, computer geek degree in order to pass judgement on an excuse making idiot on the internet?
Yeah, some people’ll stab with knives, I do it with sharpened telephone poles.
Putz.
I’m aware of Paul’s positions, and that many of the moonbats who support him consider him the reincarnation of Ronald Reagan. But thanks for the youtube’s
|
So conservatives are moonbats??
I must be undercaffeinated. I have no clue what you’re talking about.
Cryptic does not equal interesting. Sometimes more is better.
We who support Dr. Paul are indeed moonbats. And Paulistinians, Paulnuts, St. Pauli Girls, and whatever other stupidity they can think of to incorporate “Paul” into.
The lack of originality in some of these insults is surprising coming from this site.
As I posted in 210, there is a difference between questioning aspects of the government failures (although I do admit her questions about Flight 93 are a little nutty) and concluding that the notion that Muslim fanatics with box cutters outsmarted our government and crashed the planes is “unbelievable” as Maeve did.
No, I said
I’m aware of Paul’s positions, and that many of the moonbats who support him consider him the reincarnation of Ronald Reagan. But thanks for the youtube’s.
Yes, there are moonbats, support him. Which doesn’t mean everyone who supports him falls into one of the subsets of support he’s developed.
Nice try though.
I'll also note that amongst his internet supporters are those who twist the truth.
I’d call it more of an educated guess, based on what I’ve heard from libertarians. Assumptions aside, his basic point is telling. Libertarians have as much in common with democrats as they do with republicans. So why don’t you guys go horn in on their party for a while?
I didn’t accuse you of “saying” anything.
I answered CTC flippantly based on the polite, reasoned discourse non-Paulites have lobbed my way over the past couple weeks.
If you really think Libertarians have as much in common with Democrats as with Republicans, your misunderstanding of Libertarianism is profound.
The matter is settled once and for all.
Still waiting for your answer. So what’s the case with Ron Paul: supports the truther movement or just uses it to his advantage? Even you cannot deny that a large portion of his support comes from truthers. Look at that forum thread that I posted eariler. Since so many truthers support him (including Alex Jones), are they being duped by him? It does seem that they think he is the candidate that represents their views. Where do they get this idea?
Hardly. And “shouting” doesn’t make your point any more true.
Still waiting for your answer. So what’s the case with Ron Paul: supports the truther movement or just uses it to his advantage? Even you cannot deny that a large portion of his support comes from truthers. Look at that forum thread that I posted eariler. Since so many truthers support him (including Alex Jones), are they being duped by him? It does seem that they think he is the candidate that represents their views. Where do they get this idea?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.