Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'The Bourne Ultimatum' Politicized
NewsBusters ^ | August 5, 2007 | P.J. Gladnick

Posted on 08/05/2007 3:59:25 PM PDT by PJ-Comix

Perhaps we should have expected this but apparently The Bourne Ultimatum which opened this weekend is chock full of liberal proganda. So who is making this charge? Some vicious rightwinger with an axe to grind against liberal Hollywood producers? Nope. This is the claim of a liberal movie reviewer, Anthony Kaufman, who wrote the following in his Huffington Post blog, Jason Bourne: An Anti-Cheney American Hero?

A stinging rebuke against Cheney-esque black ops and torture tactics, Universal Pictures' The Bourne Ultimatum is more than just a heart-stopping international espionage thriller: It is Hollywood's most direct attack against the Bush Regime since George Clooney's one-two punch of Good Night and Good Luck and Syriana. If those more "sophisticated" dramas preached to the choir about our deteriorating civil liberties and oil-fueled overseas obsessions, the third film in the mega-successful Bourne action franchise offers up a picture of corrupt clandestine leadership for all to see -- where every Matt Damon fan can also enjoy high-powered American government officials as arch-villains committing treasonous and reckless activities without oversight.

In case we have any doubts that The Bourne Ultimatum is a liberal fantasy, Kaufman "reassures" us that it is:

But is the film really a liberal fantasy, where the bad CIA leaders get punished for their penchant for waterboarding, "experimental interrogations," "rendition" and the manipulation of American soldiers' minds with intimidation and humiliation? It sure seems so, as bullish Rumsfeld-like strategies are depicted as inept, while the sensitive, sympathetic touch of Joan Allen's CIA head Pamela Landy is shown as the most effective way to combat renegade forces. If conservatives like to label Tinseltown as leftwing, The Bourne Ultimatum should do little to assuage their concerns.

Thank you for that admission of Hollywood being leftwing, Anthony. At least that is something that most in the media won't admit. Kaufman finishes his review with an admiring look at a scene involving "moral complexity" chock full of nuances that a John Kerry would love:

Then again, perhaps the film allows us to have our blood-soaked cake and eat it, too. Matt Damon's Jason Bourne is a guilt-ridden CIA assassin, who glowers and suffers every time he swiftly strikes a rival down. But as audiences, we still bask in his every murder. Even though Bourne hates being a killing machine, I suspect audiences like it very much. After all, that's the chief source of the movie's thrills. I'd bet director Paul Greengrass (who showed some sensitivity towards depicting the 9/11 terrorists as human beings in United 93) intentionally tried to offer some moral complexity to a scene where Bourne strangles to death an obviously Arab enemy assassin. But how many people will pick up on that? Or will they just whoop and holler with the rising body count?

Most likely, no matter how hard Hollywood tries, most of the audience will overlook the obvious liberal propaganda of The Bourne Ultimatum and "whoop and holler" over the "rising body count" action. Something similar happened with another recent movie, Shooter, starring Mark Wahlberg. It also featured the standard leftwing proganda including a portrayal by Ned Beatty as an absurdly charicatured EVIL rightwing senator who practically drooled bile all over himself. So ridiculous in the propaganda department was Shooter that one of the few good guys in the FBI wore a Che Guevara T-shirt when he was off duty. Therefore be prepared for another leftwing proganda onslaught if you see The Bourne Ultimatum. The physical action, as in Shooter, is good but you will have to put on your political proganda filters in order to keep from groaning out loud.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: bourne; bourneultimatum; hollywoodleft; moviereview
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-119 last
To: ProtectOurFreedom

I was thinking more along the lines of the Charles Bronson movie “Telefon”.

Importantly, ordinary drug-induced hypnosis has a rapid decay rate unless reinforced; that is, the hypnotic training wears off pretty rapidly. However, this can be overcome with a small chip implant that would create a signal “ordering” the person to refresh their training, perhaps with just a small “beep” sound behind his ear.

As far as surgically implanting a bomb inside a person, it could be done surreptitiously by placing them into a coma for several days until healed. Surgeons routinely remove gall bladders through the navel, leaving little visible scar. He might then be “programmed” to set off his own bomb without knowing it. The bomb would only be armed by a code once he had arrived in the destination country.

If that was too much, then a similar method could be used to track him. Simple training that when he saw “Mr Big”, he would activate a signal device inside his body. JDAMs would do the rest.

Importantly, many of these techniques would also be useful in taking down the instigators of violence, many of whom are so far untouched in the WoT, because of their connections, wealth and power. They should have been the first to be targeted-assassinated.


101 posted on 08/05/2007 6:42:49 PM PDT by Popocatapetl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
The FUnniest part of Team America was the puppet sex scene. I think that was cut out of the movie but I saw it on DVD.
102 posted on 08/05/2007 6:43:02 PM PDT by PJ-Comix (Join the DUmmie FUnnies PING List for the FUNNIEST Blog on the Web)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: mainerforglobalwarming

Screwing up? They censored that movie...literally.


103 posted on 08/05/2007 6:44:07 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DCPatriot

I’m so glad someone liked it. I am planning to see it next weekend. I am preparing myself. I watched the first movie again today and am going to watch the 2nd one this week. My husband has agreed to watch the kids for me so I can go on a “girls night out” with some friends to see the 3rd. I am so excited.


104 posted on 08/05/2007 6:47:02 PM PDT by spotbust1 (Procrastinators of the world unite . . . . .tomorrow!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Of course its a leftist movie. Matt Damon is in it. This guy grew up next door to Howard Zinn, and has been planning to make a miniseries of his awful People’s History of the United States (with his twin, Affleck). I go to fewer movies now than I ever have, and not because of prices. I go far, far less (two movies in 18 months) because I’m accutely aware of the leftist/liberal crap Hollywood spews at me, and I refuse to reward them for it.


105 posted on 08/05/2007 7:09:23 PM PDT by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCPatriot

Ditto. Saw it today, too. Dick Cheney never crossed my mind!


106 posted on 08/05/2007 7:21:11 PM PDT by texpat72 (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee

Yes I remember. Funny, she played an ACLU-type lawyer on “24” as well. She must have the “look.”


107 posted on 08/06/2007 5:14:19 PM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: RepublitarianRoger

I have only seen the first Bourne movie. I read all three books and loved them. When hubby and I saw the first movie, we were so disappointed that we haven’t the stomach(s) to see the rest.

Matt Damon is nowhere close to what I pictured for Jason Bourne. I won’t say the word that comes to mind when I see Matt Damon. Maybe we’ll watch them on video someday.


108 posted on 08/06/2007 5:25:39 PM PDT by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
I saw this movie over the weekend. It made me physically ill. The cinematography was so bad as to make the movie unwatchable! Everything was shot in macro and close up, the camera bounced around so badly I had to keep looking away to avoid nausea.

Would someone please buy the director a lens with a little longer focal length!

109 posted on 08/06/2007 5:42:06 PM PDT by Species8472 (If you can't defeat them at the ballot box, get em in court!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
I hope Gary Sinise plays John Kelly in “Without Remorse"

I would LOVE to see them make "Without Remorse" into a movie. It is the best, yet least talked about, book by Clancy. Hands down.

110 posted on 08/06/2007 5:47:39 PM PDT by oldvike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: petitfour
Matt Damon is nowhere close to what I pictured for Jason Bourne. I won’t say the word that comes to mind when I see Matt Damon. Maybe we’ll watch them on video someday.

Ever since Team America: World Police, the first picture that inevitably comes to mind when his name is mentioned is that retarded puppet. LOL
111 posted on 08/06/2007 6:09:52 PM PDT by RepublitarianRoger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Unfortunately, they had to load this flick up full of the usual leftwing propaganda bilge.

Saw Bourne 3 Last Night. What a great movie, even better than the first 2 AND I didn't detect that it was loaded up with the goo you mentioned.

And, at the end, the bad guys got caught.

I guess now we can look forward to Bourne 4 (Bourne Redemption)

112 posted on 08/07/2007 4:22:06 AM PDT by evad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texpat72
Ditto. Saw it today, too. Dick Cheney never crossed my mind!

And we now know that Niki looks great as a blond or a brunette :-)

113 posted on 08/07/2007 4:27:58 AM PDT by evad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

By the time the first Bourne film came out - 2002 - over 20 had gone by from when I read the novel that by the time I saw the movie, I didn’t know if it followed the book at all. I use to like Ludlum’s stuff but for some reason I stopped reading him.


114 posted on 08/07/2007 4:35:27 AM PDT by 7thson (I've got a seat at the big conference table! I'm gonna paint my logo on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doc91678
It was HUAC, the House UnAmerican Activities Committee, that called in Hollywood. Senator McCarthy had nothing to do with it.

The left makes this mistake all the time. We should not.

115 posted on 08/07/2007 4:59:45 AM PDT by metesky (Brought To You By Satriales Aerosol PorkChop Mist - The Finest New Jersey Has To Offer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: metesky

Thank you, I stand corrected.
Other than that faux pas, the posting still stands.


116 posted on 08/07/2007 8:42:13 AM PDT by Doc91678 (Doc91678)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Doc91678

Doc, the fun part is springing that tidbit on know-it-all liberals and watching their facial contortions as they try to wrap their little brains around it. Most will tell you that you’re a liar! Bwahaha!


117 posted on 08/07/2007 9:58:28 AM PDT by metesky (Brought To You By Satriales Aerosol PorkChop Mist - The Finest New Jersey Has To Offer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
It's sad that the Bourne movies seem to have less and less to do with the books.

In the book called The Bourne Ultimatum, Jason is fighting Carlos the Jackal.

The movie has absolutely nothing to do with the book of the same name. It's just another continuation of the story of the first two movies, AFAICT.

Too bad. The book was excellent. Would have made a very good movie.

118 posted on 08/07/2007 10:04:51 AM PDT by TChris (The Republican Party is merely the Democrat Party's "away" jersey - Vox Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petitfour

“I have only seen the first Bourne movie. I read all three books and loved them. When hubby and I saw the first movie, we were so disappointed that we haven’t the stomach(s) to see the rest.”

The trick is just to accept the fact that the screenplay is only loosely based on the Bourne novels. Accurately reproducing any large amount of the plot in those novels would just take far more screen time to achieve, and would probably just be confusing to the viewers. Taken on their own merits, I think the Bourne movies are pretty good. I just saw the “Ultimatum” last night and thought it was quite entertaining. Better than the second one, I think, and maybe the first, too.

I also agree with others that the shaky camera work continues to be distracting in many cases.


119 posted on 08/08/2007 11:57:01 AM PDT by -YYZ- (Strong like bull, smart like ox.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-119 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson