Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US lawmaker defends Mecca bombing comments [Tom Tancredo..........]
BREITBART ^

Posted on 08/05/2007 3:07:07 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: zeugma

My friend, you miss the point.

What you’re saying is basically we’ll wait until they do nuke one of our cities. You do everything in your power to NEVER let that happen.

And by “THEY” you mean “a small band of fanatics.” Not a “nation.” You don’t punish the innocents for the crimes of the few depraved.


61 posted on 08/07/2007 12:04:26 PM PDT by notbackingdown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: notbackingdown
Here are some action figures and neat little plastic missiles. You are a legend in your own mind...
62 posted on 08/07/2007 7:11:12 PM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: notbackingdown
Here are some action figures and neat little plastic missiles.

You are a legend in your own mind...

63 posted on 08/07/2007 7:13:03 PM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
Wow, a comment so meaningless you had to post it twice! Better to be a legend in my own mind than a mindless trigger-happy "yes" man. "Bomb Mecca? That sounds like a swell idea, packed with a lot of thought and planning! Whatever you say, Tom, let's do it! Damn the consequences and lack of any forethought! I'm sure the rest of the world will know exactly what we were going for!" This kind of tripe is great for talk radio, but belongs nowhere the political conversation.
64 posted on 08/07/2007 7:31:52 PM PDT by notbackingdown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
Tancredo is a bull in a china shop, as this demonstrates once again. That said, the State Department, like the CIA and FBI, are about as useful as tits on a bull..... Tancredo is a bull in a china shop, as this demonstrates once again.

That said, the State Department, like the CIA and FBI, are about as useful as tits on a bull.....

Tancredo is factually correct and the dogs of war must be let loose.

As far as the State Department, the CIA and FBI, being about as useful as tits on a bull, I agree...

65 posted on 08/07/2007 7:37:34 PM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: notbackingdown
Bomb Mecca? That sounds like a swell idea, packed with a lot of thought and planning!

"A good plan, violently executed now, is better than a perfect plan next week."

-Gen. George S. Patton

66 posted on 08/07/2007 7:46:38 PM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

You fail to grasp that attacking a truly sacred place to millions of believers effectively changes the government’s stance to this being no longer a war against terrorists, but a war against Islam.

Not all Muslims are terrorists, Sir Francis. Thank God you’re not behind the nuke button.

Such an attack would do EVERYTHING for the terrorists and NOTHING for us. It’s a lose/lose situation. Post as many quotes by famous generals as you wish—keep in mind that the one above is ridiculously out of context—but try as you might, this is just another waste of oxygen but an attention-seeking Neanderthal, a failed grasp at relevancy, a stale attempt at fame.


67 posted on 08/07/2007 9:08:27 PM PDT by notbackingdown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: notbackingdown
Thank God you’re not behind the nuke button.

In your case, thank Allah...

"The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men... No stronger retrograde force exists in the world."

-Sir Winston Churchill (The River War, first edition, Vol. II, pages 248-50. London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1899).

-

"One cannot but ponder the question: What if the Arabs had been Christian? To me it seems certain that the fatalistic teachings of Mohammed and the utter degradation of women is the outstanding cause for the arrested development of the Arab. He is exactly as he was around the year 700, while we have kept on developing. Here, I think, is a text for some eloquent sermon on the virtues of Christianity."

- Gen. George S. Patton, War As I Knew It.

It is no coincidence Islamic pagans hate Israel, Jews, Christians and Western Civilization. The entire basis of Western Civilization is Mosaic Law, something both the Neo-Pagan Left and the pagan Islamic thugs cannot abide and wish to destroy.

The very idea that human beings have individual rights not subject to the whims of an earthly monarch, but subject to the laws of Yahweh, is directly from Moses.

Historically, this is proven over and over again with the successive conflicts between the forces of paganism and the Judaic culture. (This includes your idolatry of cultural Marxist paganism.)

A greater number of "atheists" and "pagans" adopt the same hackneyed tenets of a faux Judaic-Christian ideal (golden calf). They also subscribe to the Judaic fetishism of "sin," but will fight to their death in denial of it.

Most of them are so wrapped up in their own polemics that they have become nothing more than pathetic anti-Christians with the same false hypocritical philosophy. They just slap a new label on it hoping nobody will notice - - they replace the idea of "avoiding sin" with "morals."

Morality and all of its associated ideals are rooted entirely in the presupposition some higher power defines what is correct for human behavior.

Today, "morals" are a religious pagan philosophy of esoteric hobgoblins. Transfiguration is a pantheon of fantasies as the medium of infinitization. Others get derision for having an unwavering Judaic belief in Yahweh or Yeshua, although their critics and enemies will evangelize insertion of phantasmagoric fetishisms into secular law.

Mosaic Law (of which the Ten Commandments is just a part) is the foundation of Western Civilization. Genesis is the primary focus of the Declaration of Independence, from where our Constitutional rights are derived. The Ten Commandments are the foundation of our judicial system.

Moses wrote Genesis. This is why such people will jump up and down screaming when the Ten Commandments are displayed or the Creationist idea of monogamy from the book of Genesis is introduced.

68 posted on 08/07/2007 9:24:54 PM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

Taken to recycling your same tired plagiarized post, Sir Francis? For shame.

You could at least warn us there’s an echo in here.


69 posted on 08/07/2007 9:31:27 PM PDT by notbackingdown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

(Yawn)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1778391/posts?q=1&;page=51


70 posted on 08/07/2007 9:32:59 PM PDT by notbackingdown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

Oh, and to touch on your quotes...

You’re advocating a war against a religion, declared by a country whose very Constitution advocates the freedom of religion?

Time to reread that document. It’s the foundation of most conservatives’ beliefs.


71 posted on 08/07/2007 9:37:58 PM PDT by notbackingdown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: notbackingdown
Taken to recycling your same tired plagiarized post.

It is all mine... every word...

What is more at issue is your use of multiple screen names here on FreeRepublic... how many times have you been banned???

72 posted on 08/07/2007 9:38:17 PM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: notbackingdown; Jim Robinson
Taken to recycling your same tired plagiarized post.

It is all mine... every word...

What is more at issue is your use of multiple screen names here on FreeRepublic... how many times have you been banned???

73 posted on 08/07/2007 9:39:11 PM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Dutch Tulip

I just like to think they’re all spitting their coffee everytime he comes on C-Span. Go Tom!


74 posted on 08/07/2007 9:39:35 PM PDT by DanielLongo (Don't tread on me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Tough ground. Although I am not a believer in evolution, and although their fanatics would like to have my children indoctrinated on my dime by their pseudoscience, I do not advocate bombing the Museum of Natural History.

But it is Muslim fanatics who seek the death of both myself and evolutionists, and that by any means possible. So Tancredo does not lose credibility for leaving their holy sites "on the table."

75 posted on 08/07/2007 9:44:33 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: notbackingdown
Now you’re to tell me a nation is going to outright attack a holy symbol . . .

No. Didn't you listen? We're not "taking it off the table." That's all. All options ought to be open when defending our freedoms against fanatics. Period.

76 posted on 08/07/2007 9:47:14 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood; Jim Robinson

Multiple screen names? Nope. Banned before? ‘Fraid not. First time here as a member. I’m just voicing my opposition to a political stance espoused by Tancredo that is more suicidal than beneficial. You seem to agree with it.

Just because you can’t defend yourself doesn’t mean that I’m some troll.


77 posted on 08/07/2007 9:47:29 PM PDT by notbackingdown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: notbackingdown
I’m just voicing my opposition to a political stance espoused by Tancredo...

You're not doing very well... all you have is ad hominems...

Churchill warned everyone about the National Socialists before WWII, nobody listened... Churchill also warned everyone about the Islamics, nobody is listening... except a few... Tancredo sees it... so does Newt... Tancredo may not be diplomatic, but hell, we need someone to be truthful...

The Crusades were a response to the Islamic invasion of Europe. Even the Pope himself got on a horse and went to war, driving the Islamics out of Europe. The Venetians, the Bulgars and Romanians forget their own history. We need another Vlad Dracula to scare the shit out of these animals.

The facts suggest, just as they did with the Empire of Japan, that without a demand for unconditional surrender and a follow up with massive devastation, those people will continue their paths of attack. The Shinto religion was the divine excuse for the Imperial Japanese just as the Islamic religion is the excuse for the Muslims.

Islam is the political idea of a huge oligarchy with religion as an excuse. No man may become a law unto himself under the guise of freedom of religion, even in the USA.

Freedom of religion only applies to citizens of this country. Without that black idol in Mecca they pray to every day, Islam is a moot issue. Islam does not exist without it.

They want a nuclear weapon? Let's send them one, air express, right up their ass...

[Islam is a death cult, much like the Orks in the Lord of the Rings trilogy. Throw the RING OF POWER into the fires of Mount Doom and watch the tower of Sauron come crashing down.]

78 posted on 08/08/2007 4:07:39 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

Tancredo is factually correct and the dogs of war must be let loose.

As far as the State Department, the CIA and FBI, being about as useful as tits on a bull, I agree...

Where do want to ‘let them loose’?


79 posted on 08/08/2007 6:12:43 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

You are clearly either a liberal or a Bushbot and there is unfortunately no help for you as such. “Moderate Muslims”? Yeh, right. The Saudis moved their people out of their offices in World Trade 1 in the morning before the planes with their comrades hit the Twin Towers. They knew the attack was coming. This has been verified but never explained by the Saudis. I wonder why.

Your man Bush has kept our boys (us) in a war for 4 years where they are essentially ducks in a shooting gallery. We’re losing 3 men a day or more. This is not a game. Tanc is wrong to support the war, I believe, but I will still vote for him as I would for pro-war Hunter or anti-war Paul. These are good men, loyal Americans—not globalist-elitist sell-outs like our current leader. Paul has made some controversial statements, too, and has been hammered for them, yet his popularity has increased, not decreased. Hunter has stayed out of the fray and has not gone after Bush. Both Tanc and Paul have gone after Bush, big-time. You are right about one thing: It will be difficult for either Tanc or Paul to win the nomination of a party whose heads are against them. These two men knew this going in.

Perhaps Tanc was trying to get some attention; maybe he had an opportunity to show where he stands and took it. Call it opportunistic. But don’t bellittle the man. His voice alone brought the Invasion fr. Mexico to the attention of the American people long before the Minutemen Project was founded. Illegal immigration is now THE #2 issue for many Americans after the war and the Skull is finally starting interior enforcement, a job he has until now refused to do.

Was threatening Mecca and Medina “a macacca moment” for Tanc? That’s what you’re saying. I don’t think it is. Will the MNM come down on Tanc like a ton of bricks as opposed to their lighthearted treatment of Romney when he got flustered in a radio interview the other day? You bet. Tanc has almost the ENTIRE U.S. press against him, the GOP heads against him and yet he’s staying in, the same for Paul. Bravo, Tanc!


80 posted on 08/09/2007 2:08:57 AM PDT by levotb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson