Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HAL9000

‘We would see much more broadband deployment around the state.’

That’s my point. You wouldn’t.

Profitable areas are competitive. Non-profitable areas depend on an overall push by the company to see any gain. Rural Arkansas would see broadband when everyone else sees it.


102 posted on 08/06/2007 7:06:02 AM PDT by Bogey78O (Don't call them jihadis. Call them irhabis. Tick them off, don't entertain their delusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: Bogey78O
That’s my point. You wouldn’t.

I disagree. Windstream and CenteryTel are the ILECs in several areas of Arkansas. A simple comparison of those two companies against AT&T shows that they are already deploying broadband in rural areas far more aggressively than T.

SBC should have taken care of their existing wireline customers before spending billions on their acquisition spree to expand their territory. I believe that AT&T plans to let the rural copper wirelines rot - then eventually they will shut down and abandon the rural wirelines and tell everyone in rural areas to switch to cellular. (Of course, a lot of AT&T workers here will lose their jobs when that happens.)

103 posted on 08/06/2007 10:59:45 AM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson