Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FDA Advisors Revise Limits on Acne Drug Accutane That Leads to Abortions
LifeNews.com ^ | August 2, 2007 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 08/04/2007 7:21:07 PM PDT by monomaniac

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Food and Drug Administration advisors on Wednesday urged the federal health agency to place fewer restrictions on the acne drug Accutane and generic versions of it. The drug has caused significant problems, such as birth defects, for unborn children since it was first introduced in 1982.

Accutane, also known as isotretinoin, was approved by FDA in 1982 for use in cases of severe recalcitrant cystic acne unresponsive to other therapies including systemic antibiotics.

The drug received a FDA pregnancy category X rating because it caused birth defects in animals and the agency said Accutane should not be used by women who are pregnant or are at risk of becoming pregnant.

But pregnant women used the drug and reports of children born with birth defects due to in utero Accutane exposure became increasingly common.

Pro-life groups complained that, within the FDA, abortion has been viewed as an acceptable solution to the problem of Accutane usage and pregnancy exposure. They also were concerned that drug-maker Hoffman-La Roche also saw abortion as a means of combating potential birth defects.

The FDA addressed the issue over the years and eventually created the iPledge system to monitor usage and prevent women from getting pregnant while on the drug.

The advisors on Wednesday called for more flexibility in rules designed to help encourage women to prevent pregnancies while taking the drug.

Administrators of a program devised to help lower the problems associated with the drug said there were 122 pregnancies during the first year of the program and another 37 in the four months since.

While 35 women who became pregnant left the program, the advisors monitored the rest, according to an AP report. They found that 54 women had pregnancies that ended in abortion and another 17 women had miscarriages while using the drug.

Another 15 women remain pregnant and the one baby who was born to this point escaped any birth defects or other problems caused by the drug.

AP also reported that Accutane's manufacturer learned of 19 other pregnancies among women using the drug, even though the program was supposed to cover every patient, doctor and pharmacy involved in the drug.

The advisory panel decided that women should fill the prescription for the drug within seven days of a negative pregnancy test and not within seven days of first seeing a doctor for it.

They reaffirmed the desire for all patients to be enrolled in the program and want more detailed follow-up since just 10 percent of the 122 women who got pregnant provided significant information.

Still, Dr. Susan Walker, director of the FDA's dermatology drugs office, admitted that it is unlikely that the agency will ever prevent all women on the drug from getting pregnant.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: abortion; birthdefects; fda; prolife

1 posted on 08/04/2007 7:21:12 PM PDT by monomaniac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: monomaniac
Over half of the monitored pregnancies that weren't aborted ended in miscarrage and, of the live births, only one was without defect???

This makes thalidomide look positively tame by comparison.

2 posted on 08/04/2007 10:12:04 PM PDT by Marie (Unintended consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: Psycho_Bunny
Consider that women that are irresponsible enough to use isotretinoin while pregnant are probably prone to other action that put their unborn child at risk.

Never accept science reported as news at face value. There is always an agenda.

4 posted on 08/07/2007 9:15:46 AM PDT by Kowdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac
I'm sorry....I just asked the Admin Mods to delete my first post because I've re-read the article and realized that I totally misunderstood the point.

The article is highlighting that the advisers are trying to clamp down on use of the drug around and during pregnancy.

For some reason, I read it in the opposite context....that the authors were criticizing the panel for attempting to loosen restrictions so the drug could be more widely prescribed.

I don't have the slightest idea what I was thinking.

5 posted on 08/07/2007 4:39:43 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marie
Thalidomide is practically bubble gum compared to what isotretinoin does to pregnancies.

I've never seen the packaging for Accutane but the packaging for the generic version is pretty remarkable.  Every surface of the box has an outline of a pregnant woman with a redline circle.  The instructions have graphics of deformed children and the outline pregnant woman with a warning along the lines of "WILL CAUSE BIRTH DEFECTS 100% OF THE TIME."  Each corner of the blister pack has the pregnancy woman graphic and the foil over each individual pill has the graphic for a total of 14 warnings on each 10-pill blister pack.

My doctor actually told me not to keep it in the bathroom or in the kitchen with my vitamins but literally told me to put it in a cupboard higher than my girlfriend could reach.

I think the only reason it hasn't been pulled from the market is because when used properly for its intended purpose, it's a miracle drug. 

 

6 posted on 08/07/2007 5:03:51 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny

It hasn’t been pulled completely from the market because it does work in some cases. From what I’ve noticed, doctors only seem to prescribe it as a last resort to acne issues. If you are curious to the major side effects and about the latest news regarding Accutane then visit http://www.ennislaw.com/accutane.htm for more information. Hope this helps


7 posted on 11/24/2007 9:43:08 AM PST by kx152rider (Ennis & Ennis P.A.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kx152rider
I've taken isotretinoin. I'm not confused about it.....I was confused about the context of the original article, which I had mis-read.
8 posted on 11/24/2007 10:05:38 AM PST by Psycho_Bunny (Islam: Imagine a clown car......with guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson