Pro-Life Ping
Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
If this is the case, the pro-life movement and GOP candidates in order to be consistent would have to not only advocate the banning of abortion but also the use of birth control pills.
Not everyone defines abortion this way. While few people will say anything in forums because the vocal majority in most forums will react with anger and insults, many real folks out here in real life don't see this situation as abortion. I've read that a large number of fertilized eggs never implant anyway. Because of that, I don't believe that the unborn child is a person until implantation or possibly until a few days after implantation.
I couldn't care less when biological life begins. I care about when the embryo becomes a person. The law doesn't exist to protect biology. The law exists to protect people. I believe that around the time a woman can know that she is pregnant, the unborn child is (or almost is) a person. Therefore, I believe that any act that destroys a known pregnancy should be illegal unless there is some circumstance that justifies that killing. Until that time, I'm not bothered by birth control techniques that try to discourage implantation.
Bill
contraception=abortion. End of discussion.
This doctor is trying quite hard to blur the line between the “morning after pill” and typical hormonal birth control. Both are essentially hormonal birth control though the pill is different. The pill is not 100% effective because it doesn’t always prevent ovulation. While it is true that in rare cases women on the pill can experience failed pregnancies, that doesn’t mean the pill caused it. It’s important to note that failed pregnancies are actually quite common and the mother may not even know it.
THANKS for the thread! WOW!
.