Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Comet Theory Collides With Clovis Research, May Explain Disappearance of Ancient People
University of South Carolina(USC News) ^ | June 28, 2007 | Staff

Posted on 08/03/2007 11:29:34 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-124 next last
To: colorado tanker

Yeah, I quite agree, Syria did come very close. The defense was so fierce (and costly) on the Israeli side that the Syrians may have thought the reserves had arrived. They did indeed begin to pour in during that lull or regrouping or whatever it was. The Syrian losses to that point must have been daunting; the final toll was something close to 1000 tanks lost. The consideration on the Syrian side may have been to assess whether the attack could/should continue. As one of the biggest tank battles since WWII, and as a Soviet-style massed armor offensive, I’m glad to hear that it is studied.

It’s odd to me that the massive tank-killer tactics used by the Egyptians hasn’t caught on per se. Seems like an effective counter against a foe with superior quality or quantity of armor.

But anyway... Greenspan’s erudite style and intransigence really got to the Congress. He basically blackmailed them into balancing the budget in order to get the lower rates they were trying to demand. :’)

And then the comet hit, and...


101 posted on 08/06/2007 3:26:10 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Monday, August 6, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
It was back in the Cold War and my unit would be one of the first sent to Germany. We were told to expect odds of about 6 or 7 to 1 in defending against a Soviet-style breakthrough attack, which is about what the IDF faced against the Syrians. So, you bet we studied their tactics. And it really helped our morale back in the post-Vietnam Jimmuh Carter military to see how American equipment and similar tactics could defeat a Soviet proxy.

There really hasn't been a conflict that would showcase modern anti-tank equipment and tactics since 1973. We expected it in the first Gulf War, but Saddam's antitank weapons were older and basically ineffective against the Abrams, so he mainly relied on tank v. tank defenses. If we ever have to take on Syria, they have some of the Russians' more up to date equipment.

BTW, I remember participating in a huge war game simulating a Warsaw Pact conventional attack on Germany. With heavy losses, we stopped them about half way across. When I read Tom Clancy's book on the same subject it struck me how close our results were to his description of the Army side of the conflict. I always wondered if he was privy to the results.

102 posted on 08/06/2007 3:48:43 PM PDT by colorado tanker (I'm unmoderated - just ask Bill O'Reilly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake
Are you talking about the May meeting in Acapulco? I think that's what's referenced in the article. I did a Google on the Younger-Dryas Event, found a main article on the cooling period with a link to another article on the Younger Dryas Impact Event. That article referenced the May meeting and included a link to a site with abstracts about the sessions, including one titled "New Insights Into Extraterrestrial Impacts, Younger Dryas Cooling, Mass Extinction, and the Clovis People I" with links to abstracts from 6 papers presented at the session.

Don't know if it will provide any more info than you already have, but impact research is a topic I'm fascinated by.  And Gene Shoemaker is one of my heroes.  I happened to visit Meteor crater only a few weeks after his death and met several people there who had worked with him and knew him well.  They were pleased that someone knew who he was, his connection with Meteor Crater as well as the Apollo program and not just the Shoemaker/Levy 9 comet.
 

103 posted on 08/06/2007 3:54:30 PM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: blam
I have been to the cave and stomped the area very thoroughly. I also have discussed the red haired people with Paiute medicine women at great length. The actual time of the events are hard to pin down since the old Paiutes didn’t really seem to care much about time. The red heads do seem to fit the time line but do not seem to fit European exploration time line. There are notes in Chinese history of large red headed people from the Mongel area but most modern Mongels are not what we would consider tall. Keep in mind also that Paiutes tend to be smaller in stature than many plains Indians. So tall could be an perception. The skeletons would seem to be from people more on the taller side of what we would consider the norm today. One old Shoshone told me that they came from the city of the ancients (I pondered this for some time and concluded that they must be referring to Atlantis or possibly some Central American culture — except that that wouldn’t fit the migration theory at all). I do question why Atlantians (if they existed) would be chased of by Paiutes with relatively crude weapons and tactics - never mind that that doesn’t seem to fit well into the time line. I have asked both Sioux and Cherokee if their oral traditions have an Atlantis story - can't get a definitive answer - other than Atlantis is about the NA's in this continent. Lastly there is a group of bone hunters that travel the area extensively looking for artifacts. They will openly discuss the probability that this is some very ancient race on the waining of their span of time. The possibility that the red heads come from something other that accepted development and spread of humans would again through science into a tizzy.

I go out of my way to travel the area and hunt along the current water ways. It is very clear that at one point there was much more water there than the current situation and not just the inland sea that covered the area all the way to SLC.

104 posted on 08/06/2007 4:27:10 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Beware of the seminar poster.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

The nuclear deterrent kept ‘em right where they were. Then, as Shevrednze (? whew...) said to Gorbachev, “the whole thing has gone rotten”, and a bunch of hardware got sold to China. That was really nice of the Russians, eh? ;’) It was good that a ground war never took place during the Cold War (two major threats or more toward West Berlin, during the Truman administration, and again during, hmm, the Missile Crisis), because judging from WWII, huge losses don’t phase the overall ground movements of the Red Army.


105 posted on 08/06/2007 4:57:06 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Monday, August 6, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$
Thanks for that report, very interesting.

DNA has the potential, and I believe, will shortly solve some of these mysteries. I just hope it happens before I die, lol.

106 posted on 08/06/2007 5:17:57 PM PDT by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
It was good that a ground war never took place during the Cold War

True. The Sov's weren't troubled by casualties.

We took the threat seriously. Since Ike NATO depended on the reserved right to first use of nukes to deter a Soviet ground attack and their superior numbers. But in post-Vietnam America, especially with Jimmuh in the White House, there was a lot of suspicion that the Sov's would not be met with a nuke response and we would have to slug out a conventional war. We were concerned the Sov's sized up the situation the same way and might just be tempted.

Thankfully, it never happened. They got bogged down in Afghanistan.

In hindsight it may look silly, now that we know how near collapse the Soviet economy was and how bad training and morale were in their army, but at the time our intel seemed to think they were formidable.

What were you saying about that comet? :-))

107 posted on 08/06/2007 5:20:03 PM PDT by colorado tanker (I'm unmoderated - just ask Bill O'Reilly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok
That indeed is it! After wading through the sciencespeak from your link, it would appear to this layman they have accumulated enough evidence to support their claim(s).

One of the things I was and am most curioius about is I had heard before the meeting they were going to present findings linking the event to the Carolina Bays. I didn't find anything in that particular link making a connection so it may be necessary to dig a little more.

108 posted on 08/06/2007 5:30:50 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake
Ice Age Ends Smashingly: Did A Comet Blow Up Over Eastern Canada? (More) (Carolina Bays)
109 posted on 08/06/2007 5:53:44 PM PDT by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: blam
You are welcome - hope it was helpful. It is sort of a minor obsession with me.

I have not been able to determine if there is enough of any DNA in the "bones" left to run a sample on. When I press the question with the museum they get weird. Guess I need to make a big donation!!!! Too bad becasue my daughter has access to one the best DNA labs in the West.

Also I remembered over dinner that 9 years ago when I started this quest an old rancher was the first to tell me about the red headed people. He maintained that they were nothing more than Vikings and the Paiutes couldn't tell time. After some research I went back to him and asked how explained the "findings". He said "Nothing can be counted on when it has been covered with bat cra$ for a few hundred years!"

110 posted on 08/06/2007 6:40:13 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Beware of the seminar poster.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: blam
Well well, from HERE(formatting added):

The Carolina Bays, one of the most conspicuous geomorphic features on the Atlantic Coastal Plain of the United States, are a group of about 500,000, oriented, crater-like, elliptical lakes, wetlands, and depressions, ranging from a few dozen meters to about 11 km in length. Although long proposed as impact structures (Melton and Schriever, 1933; Prouty, 1934), this origin for the Carolina Bays has remained controversial mainly because of an apparent absence of associated extraterrestrial materials. Analyses of Bay orientation showed that their long axes converge near the Great Lakes, suggesting that an impact or airburst over that region may have formed the Bays (Eyton and Parkhurst, 1975).

However, Bays dates have been reported over a wide range, calling into question whether all Carolina Bays could have formed simultaneously, although this issue remains unresolved and controversial. Many Bay researchers, who subscribe to widely differing theories, agree that modern Carolina Bays have been subject to repeated modification and that they most likely evolved from some type of ancestral depressions.

Now for the first time, we present conclusive geochemical and sedimentary evidence in support of an extraterrestrial connection for the Carolina Bays. Analyses of sediment from the rim sands and basins of fifteen Bays, widely distributed across North and South Carolina, reveal anomalously high abundances of microspherules, iridium, fullerenes with ET helium, carbon spherules, glass-like carbon, and other potential markers for extraterrestrial impact. No such markers were found in paleosols beneath the rim sands or basal sediments of the Bays examined. The assemblage of geochemical and sediment signatures of extraterrestrial impact found in Bay sediments are essentially the same as in the pan-North-American Younger Dryas impact boundary layer (the YDB), dated at 12.9 ka.

We hypothesize that at least some Bays were formed by the YD impact during the last deglacial, and we present OSL and radiocarbon dating, along with stratigraphic profiling, in support of this age. Data from the Carolina Bays we have examined suggest that at least some modern Carolina Bays may have evolved from depressions which were excavated by primary ejecta, secondary ejecta, and/or the shock wave from the Younger Dryas impact event.

Are you convinced??? The fly in the ointment seems to be differing dates of the bays themselves. Odd.

111 posted on 08/06/2007 6:55:33 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$
I have not been able to determine if there is enough of any DNA in the "bones" left to run a sample on. When I press the question with the museum they get weird. Guess I need to make a big donation!!!! Too bad becasue my daughter has access to one the best DNA labs in the West.

Any teeth? You have a much better chance of getting ancient mtDNA from teeth.

The On Your Knees Cave sample, at 10,300 years old, was obtained from a tooth and yielded usable mtDNA (after about three years of work). Brian Kemp, who did that work, is setting up a new lab to concentrate on ancient DNA, so there should be some great new data coming!

112 posted on 08/06/2007 6:56:20 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
In hindsight it may look silly, now that we know how near collapse the Soviet economy was and how bad training and morale were in their army, but at the time our intel seemed to think they were formidable.
nah, not silly. The WWII-era Soviet public put up with terrible privation, well, I guess that goes for the Soviet-era public in general; and yet they mounted the largest ground assault in the history of the world in response to Operation Barbarossa. The threat was real. No one had a gun to their head when they set up a proxy puppet state in Afghanistan then invaded under the terms of the so-called mutual defense pact when the Muzzies went hog-wild to oppose the puppets. The media was state controlled, but no one could control the word of mouth when the body bags started to arrive, and everyone seemed to know someone who had lost a son, brother, or father.
113 posted on 08/06/2007 9:44:52 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Monday, August 6, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

IMHO insufficient credit has been given to Afghanistan in the demise of the Soviet Union. I think the devastating impact on both the economy and the Red Army influenced the decisions not to respond with force in Poland and Lithuania when they began to break away. I don’t buy Gorby’s line that he didn’t do it because he was just a closet liberal social democrat all along.


114 posted on 08/07/2007 9:20:00 AM PDT by colorado tanker (I'm unmoderated - just ask Bill O'Reilly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

To this day, Gorbachev doesn’t want to admit that he was pushed around from inside and outside the country.


115 posted on 08/07/2007 10:02:52 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Monday, August 6, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake

Ping.


116 posted on 10/17/2007 2:01:08 PM PDT by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

just a fake bookmark for myself:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1876220/posts?page=18#18


117 posted on 01/21/2008 11:10:46 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__________________Profile updated Wednesday, January 16, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
Just updating the GGG info, not sending a general distribution.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

·Dogpile · Archaeologica · ArchaeoBlog · Archaeology · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google ·
· The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


118 posted on 06/06/2009 10:55:04 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Justa

Ping.


119 posted on 01/26/2010 10:15:31 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Thank you for the link to this very interesting thread.


120 posted on 04/02/2010 12:13:12 PM PDT by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson