Did you write this?
That was because Mitt was taking a political moral position that disagreed with the LDS position. His presidential platform is morally in line with his church. There would be no need to consult them.
I think you did..but I'm a male lesbian, and prone to mistakes. Ha!
IF you did indeed write that...then I would ask you to go back and re-read my post. Here's the post number 234.
It's an accurate reply to your post.
Thanks..appreciate it....
No it's not. My post was an explanation and a response to the charge that Mitt would be approaching his church elders for guidance as president. Mitt approached his church in the past to get permission to hold a political position at odds with this church. It was a statement of fact and not something I agreed or disagreed with. Mitt is running on a conservative presidential platform and none of his political moral positions are in disagreement with his church and thus, there is no need for Mitt to approach his church about any of them.
Sometimes to correctly understand a post, one most go back and review an exchange and more than one post.