Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TAdams8591
I don’t think he’ll have to ask them if he can politically espouse posotions they already agree with.

WHAT? You're the one who posted this gem: "Well they told me in Salt Lake City I could take this position, and in fact I probably had to in order to win in a liberal state like Massachusetts."

I don't want the POTUS asking ANY religious group for permission to do ANYTHING! Do YOU? SHEESH!

193 posted on 08/04/2007 9:07:40 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (BUILD THE WALL- BUILD IT TALL-DON'T BUILD IT SMALL- DEPORT THEM ALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]


To: greyfoxx39

That was because Mitt was taking a political moral position that disagreed with the LDS position. His presidential platform is morally in line with his church. There would be no need to consult them.


196 posted on 08/04/2007 9:13:52 AM PDT by TAdams8591 ( Guiliani is a Democrat in Republican drag. Mitt Romney for president in 2008! : ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]

To: greyfoxx39

That was because Mitt was taking a political moral position that disagreed with the LDS position. His presidential platform is morally in line with his church. There would be no need to consult them.


197 posted on 08/04/2007 9:13:57 AM PDT by TAdams8591 ( Guiliani is a Democrat in Republican drag. Mitt Romney for president in 2008! : ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson