To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; wku man; SLB; ...
I note that the same $400 million dollars that the dems are happy to spend to infringe our God-given freedoms is the same amount they want to slice from the
Airborne Laser (ABL) program, a much worthier endeavor, IMHO.
8 posted on
08/03/2007 1:37:22 PM PDT by
Joe Brower
(Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
To: Joe Brower
The citizens are more of a threat than the North Koreans right now I guess. I’m sure Richardson has assurances.
10 posted on
08/03/2007 1:45:43 PM PDT by
beltfed308
(Rudy: When you absolutely,positively need a liberal for President.)
To: Joe Brower
It’ll be very reasonable at first, and will grow to become a monster, with govt. commissar’s blocking millions from being able to buy or own guns.
If we haven’t learned this by now.....
15 posted on
08/03/2007 2:31:46 PM PDT by
Travis McGee
(--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
To: Joe Brower
The chemical lasers are just an interesting sideshow, but in reality, chemical lasers are difficult to maintain and quickly run out of components that make them lase. The Israelis are working on semi-conductor lasers and have them pumping out more than 10 kilowatts now. They have successfully used them to shoot down rockets, mortars, and artillery shells in flight. They figure that within a couple of years they will have them up to the 100 kw range and at that point they will be ready for more field testing and deployment.
25 posted on
08/03/2007 5:46:00 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson