Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China claims sole right to pick living Buddhas
AP ^ | 03 Aug 2007 | AP

Posted on 08/03/2007 11:00:53 AM PDT by BGHater

Ratcheting up its control over Tibetan Buddhism, China Friday claimed the sole right Friday to recognize living Buddhas, reincarnations of famous lamas that form the backbone of the religion's clergy.

All future incarnations of living Buddhas related to Tibetan Buddhism “must get government approval,” the official Xinhua News Agency said, citing the State Administration for Religious Affairs.

China's officially atheistic communist government has increasingly sought to direct Tibetan Buddhism, for centuries the basis of Tibet's civil, religious, cultural and political life. Reincarnate lamas, known as tulkus, often lead religious communities and oversee the training of monks, giving them enormous influence over religious life in Tibet.

China already insists that only the government can approve the appointments of the best-known reincarnates, including the Dalai and Panchen Lamas, the No. 1 and No. 2 figures in Tibetan Buddhism.

A copy of the new rules posted to the administration's website said the selection of reincarnates “must preserve national unity and solidarity of all ethnic groups.

“The process cannot be influenced by any group or individual from outside the country,” it said in an apparent reference to the Dalai Lama, Tibet's exiled spiritual leader.

The Dalai Lama, 71, fled to India in 1959 amid an aborted uprising against Chinese rule. Beijing has said it will pick his successor when he dies.

China in 1992 rejected the exiled Dalai Lama's choice for the latest reincarnation of the Panchen, seizing the boy and appointing another instead.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: buddhas; china; communist; tibetan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
See also: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1875674/posts

Sad that we support these guys with trade.

1 posted on 08/03/2007 11:00:58 AM PDT by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Why doesn’t anyone ever use the “i” word with China?

Why is impossible for the elites to admit that Communist regimes can be imperialist?


2 posted on 08/03/2007 11:03:44 AM PDT by denydenydeny (Expel the priest and you don't inaugurate the age of reason, you get the witch doctor--Paul Johnson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

When government picks your God, your God is government.


3 posted on 08/03/2007 11:04:07 AM PDT by Lexington Green (Remember when Hispanics were White?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

The United States is already forever disgraced by it’s leaders dealings with the Communist party of China. And we let them and continue to let them do it.

If our leadership can deal with a nation like China (despite what it has done and is doing) the way that it has, then think of how it can and probably will deal with us.


4 posted on 08/03/2007 11:10:39 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
State Administration for Religious Affairs

That just sounds creepy.

5 posted on 08/03/2007 11:12:59 AM PDT by HoosierHawk (If I need to add a sarcasm tag, maybe you don't belong on this forum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny

China is not a Communist country any more, it’s a Fascist country, and it has alway been imperialist.


6 posted on 08/03/2007 11:14:07 AM PDT by Truthsearcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HoosierHawk

The sad thing is that the Chinese people don’t really know any other way. Our Western (that is west-european descended) culture has experienced a period of time (the Dark Ages) when there was no effective central government and yet religion, society and culture survived just fine. That heritage and that realization is why any govt that would say that to Westerners gets laughed off as arrogant fools & told to pound salt. But the Chinese are accustomed to thousands of years of a massive empirial government that can dictate any aspects of religion, economy, culture, etc. One can only hope the lessons of the west are being learned there too.


7 posted on 08/03/2007 11:20:06 AM PDT by sanchmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Truthsearcher
China is not a Communist country any more, it’s a Fascist country, and it has alway been imperialist.

I have a hard time distinguishing between Hitler's fascism and Maoism or Stalinism. They all are examples of the mighty iron fist dictating to the masses. It would be more correct to say China was never a Communist state. Marx's idea of communist government was anarchy. That certainly is not true of the former Soviet Union and China.

8 posted on 08/03/2007 11:23:08 AM PDT by LoneRangerMassachusetts (The only good Mullah is a dead Mullah. The only good Mosque is the one that used to be there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
They also claim control over appointment of Catholic bishops.

Note to Taiwan: this is what "one country two systems" should look like to the Chicoms.

9 posted on 08/03/2007 11:24:54 AM PDT by colorado tanker (I'm unmoderated - just ask Bill O'Reilly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

China should have NOTHING to do with picking any Buddhas.

One of the most compelling books you will ever read:

http://www.amazon.com/Autobiography-Tibetan-Monk-Palden-Gyatso/dp/0802135749/ref=sr_1_1/102-7431656-3592128?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1186166041&sr=8-1


10 posted on 08/03/2007 11:34:13 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Truth : Liberals :: Kryptonite : Superman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

....at the North Pole.


11 posted on 08/03/2007 11:34:34 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (When Bubba lies, the finger flies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

The Chiney can pick my nose !


12 posted on 08/03/2007 11:35:59 AM PDT by ßuddaßudd (7 days - 7 ways Guero >>> with a floating, shifting, ever changing persona....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
Note to Taiwan: this is what "one country two systems" should look like to the Chicoms.

Trust me when I say that I'm *no* fan of the Chicom leaders but are they doing the same thing in Hong Kong or Macau that they're doing on he mainland? Are Catholic Cardinals/Bishops in Hong Kong,for example,being appointed by the Vatican or by Beijing?

13 posted on 08/03/2007 11:55:55 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (If martyrdom is so cool,why does Osama Obama go to such great lengths to avoid it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
The Dalai Lama, 71, fled to India in 1959 amid an aborted uprising against Chinese rule. Beijing has said it will pick his successor when he dies.

Beijing can say this and pick that, but none of these actions will have any more legitimacy than their occupation of Tibet.
14 posted on 08/03/2007 12:04:55 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

So many good economic freedom decisions... and so few good decisions on personal freedoms. *sigh*


15 posted on 08/03/2007 12:07:22 PM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

“China claims sole right to pick living Buddhas”

The tricky part is not picking them too early, before they’re ripe.


16 posted on 08/03/2007 1:06:06 PM PDT by Salamander (And don't forget my Dog; fixed and consequent.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
The Chicoms are being nice to Hong Kong right now because they still have some hope of enticing Taiwan into their grasp and they still get a lot of investment and sales through there. Tibet is instructive as to how the Chicoms act when they feel no restraints, which is how they would feel if they ever got their cold, clammy hands around Taiwan.
17 posted on 08/03/2007 1:16:19 PM PDT by colorado tanker (I'm unmoderated - just ask Bill O'Reilly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne; Dr. Marten; B4Ranch; Jeff Head; Travis McGee; ALOHA RONNIE; Ronaldus Magnus; ...
The United States is already forever disgraced by it’s leaders dealings with the Communist party of China. And we let them and continue to let them do it.

I am in total agreement.

If our leadership can deal with a nation like China (despite what it has done and is doing) the way that it has, then think of how it can and probably will deal with us.

Precisely right!!

BTW: Have you never wondered why the SPP negotiations (the Security, Prosperity Partnership, etc) being conducted with our two national neighbors under the assertion made by W:

"... that the three nations are bound by a shared belief in freedom, economic opportunity, and strong democratic institutions."

Clearly that "binding" process is not based on the throwaway lines. The SPP negotiations don't appear to follow any of the precepts of any of the three nation's "strong democratic institutions" ...instead they are doing almost everything in a secrecy, i.e., "non-transparent way" so profound and arbitrarily at the Executive level without legislative oversight or any legislative mandate thereto in any of the three countries...such that it has raised alarms amongst virtually all the watchdogs of liberty and Constitutional Self-Rule...

I believe it vindicates your fears about the way we have been treating with China...expressing itself in similar duplicity and affront to liberty here.

An arrogant "Bipartisan" elite thinks that it is in charge in both Congress and the White House...and since it is a "Bipartisan" corruption with a shared globalist agenda...they feel immune to any of the normal Constitutional checks or balances. Those checks and balances are effectively neutralized.

18 posted on 08/03/2007 1:34:13 PM PDT by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
The United States is already forever disgraced by it’s leaders dealings with the Communist party of China.

So what do you think our options are?

Ignore China until they decide to pull a Russia and try to take over the world?

Bomb the heck out of them and give them reason to declare war on us?

Other?

19 posted on 08/03/2007 1:41:10 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody; Jeff Head; Alamo-Girl
So what do you think our options are? Ignore China until they decide to pull a Russia and try to take over the world?

They are already doing it right under the noses of the supposed smart guys.

Bomb the heck out of them and give them reason to declare war on us?

Uh, they already have undeclared war in trade (clearly an aggressive one at that). And their military race to attain viable asymmetric options to actually defeat us...no matter our supposed general "superiority."

Are you aware that in WW-II, on paper, and in all fundamentals, tank numbers, planes, troops...the French Army was significantly, not just a little, superior to the German army that Hitler attacked it with?

You can't go on simple numbers on paper. And you really need to be wary that those "asymmetric" options the Chinese are focused on like laser beams...are PRECISELY the kinds of things which turn the tables.

Why do you think the Chicom ASAT weapons capability has the Pentagon finally undeniably in a tizzy, despite the lid that the oblivious White House keeps on it?

The Chicoms and PLA have long since definitively declared the U.S. to be "the Main Enemy." Let's get real. Let's get ready. Roll up the sleeves and prepare for the war we aren't asking for. They are.

20 posted on 08/03/2007 1:54:16 PM PDT by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson