Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lindsey Graham's About-face
American Thinker ^ | 8-03-07 | Janet Levy

Posted on 08/03/2007 4:29:23 AM PDT by Renfield

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: Renfield
Lindsey, dude, you can slip and slide and slyly contort
But you're una dia late y uno peso short.

Leni

41 posted on 08/03/2007 6:16:28 AM PDT by MinuteGal (Three Cheers for the FRed, White and Blue !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

later


42 posted on 08/03/2007 6:16:53 AM PDT by I_be_tc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970; doodad

I firmly believe that we are at a crossroads with respect to the future of our republic. We can either uphold the status quo of RINOism, globalism, and the slow slide into the abyss of full-blown socialism... or we can FIGHT. Not just with words, not just online, but with money, with time, with action. We can replace the current crop of elitist RINO politicians... with leaders.

Donate. Volunteer. Spread the word. Everyone is good at something... do whatever you can to effect change, and WE WILL CARRY THE DAY. Can you imagine the financial impact of everyone on this site making a donation, not just to the primary candidate in their state, but to ANY viable conservative candidate?

The time to change the course of history for our country will be in the next primary election. Let’s do it.


43 posted on 08/03/2007 6:29:43 AM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? YOU ARE A SOCIALIST WITH NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

Tarred and feathered, and thrown out of office. That would have been Graham’s fate in a more civilized era.


44 posted on 08/03/2007 6:35:19 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty

Misquoting is not something we should tolerate... yes we can say the quote captures the gist of Kerry’s legacy but when you put quote marks around something is has to mean something. People who like to pat themselves on the back over their principles shouldn’t just let this slide. That was my point in questioning the opening quote.


45 posted on 08/03/2007 6:50:42 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
Okay, all you South Carolinians! Throw the bum out! He's too dumb to serve in the U.S. Senate--and that's saying PLENTY!

Graham's got a big war chest, I understand; and it's not going to be easy for a challenger to succeed in the Republican Primary against him, but a grassroots rejection of Lindsey--remember how Chambliss and Isakson were booed by Republicans?--might force the State GOP to reject the renomination of Lindsey as political suicide.

The key, I think, is to find a replacement for Lindsey now.

Lindsey's served as a useful idiot for the likes of Teddy Kennedy before. He'll do it again. He lacks the wit to avoid it, and he might have something up his sleave--like getting to be some RINO's Vice Presidential candidate at some time in the future, or something like that. He's gotta go.

46 posted on 08/03/2007 6:55:24 AM PDT by Savage Beast ("History is not just cruel. It is witty." ~Charles Krauthammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

so don’t let it slide. conduct a search for each an every instance kerry is misquoted and lecture to the people who have misquoted him. unless youre really just patting yourself on the back for pointing out an error that everyone else takes for fact.


47 posted on 08/03/2007 7:00:12 AM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty

Shouldn’t we point out an error that everyone takes for fact? Do you see something disingenuous with that? Imagine the misquotes that will be made for Fred Thompson. Shouldn’t these too be pointed out too?


48 posted on 08/03/2007 7:05:49 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

absolutely. you have a lot of work ahead of you. :)


49 posted on 08/03/2007 7:07:39 AM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty

My point is that I’d expect a little help from those who indulge themselves with claims of having principle. I’ll see you then.


50 posted on 08/03/2007 7:12:06 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

Comment #51 Removed by Moderator

To: new cruelty

Done. I was the one who first brought it up and tried to enlist the help of Freepers. My memory or my search techniques could have been faulty so I questioned myself first. Pissy? That’s what I’d call your first comment to me but I may have misinterpreted.


52 posted on 08/03/2007 7:27:17 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: vikingd00d

But it looks like Graham is the alternative so ...


53 posted on 08/03/2007 7:31:11 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: All
In the face of overwhelming public disapproval - that may yet result in his forfeiting re-election - a humbled Graham reversed his La Raza-consonant position on amnesty and cowered to voters' demands.

Ha!... ARROGANT BASTARD most politicians are, but this one!... is a special one... He has all the makings of the "McCacain the II." Politicians are so full of themselves... but when they actually see their *ss is on the line...Boy, do their "convictions" change quickly. I detest people like that, especially politicians.

It is rewarding to see that now with the Internet, we are able to REMEMBER all their transgressions and bring them back at the proper time. We no longer are the bunch of idiots that can easily be manipulted by political consultants who had it as a rule we would forget everything by the next election. Just look at Mr McCacain... he is paying and will pay back for all the backstabbing to the Republicans just a few months ago.

54 posted on 08/03/2007 7:36:28 AM PDT by ElPatriota (Duncan Hunter 08 & Let's not forget, we are all still friends, basically :) despite our differences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
Pissy? That’s what I’d call your first comment to me but I may have misinterpreted.

Nice recovery. Just to be sure, let's take another look together...

I began my first post to you with "good question." That seems innocent enough. So far so good. Though you might have taken that to mean, "geez and pete, you moron, what the hell is the matter with you?"

I dunno. Let's continue... "i searched around and found that quote was attributed to kerry on several sites but i have not found a direct source siting the moment he said it." Ah,... an effort was made to help clear up the matter. It's a stretch but maybe you mistook this to mean "you are a low life piece of trash that i wouldn't waste a moment of my time on". again, i dunno.

No matter, my search for a quote was inconclusive so I closed with a possible scenario that you likely took to mean that I was insulting your race, religion, or sexual preference, "it could be that people are paraphrasing his comments. in any case “I was for the war before I was against the war” has become kerry’s legacy."

I'm going to have to go with you "may have misinterpreted". Notice the fine use of quotation marks. : )

55 posted on 08/03/2007 7:43:49 AM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
What an awful lot of work you are putting into this. Sorry, it wasn't your first comment it was this comment...unless youre really just patting yourself on the back for pointing out an error

Pissy or not, what's the deal with lambasting me for questioning the initial quote this article was based on? Seems strange and misplaced effort to me and WAY TOO MUCH WORK.

56 posted on 08/03/2007 7:54:47 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
Too much work? I have no principles, now I have too much. Be flattered. I'm not lambasting you. I think you're worth the effort. And I haven't lambasted you for questioning the quote. I think it's a valid question. I even offered some assistance. Here's the deal... If you feel lambasted, it is likely because of this preachy comment that you made to me but did not back up with any action until later, "People who like to pat themselves on the back over their principles shouldn’t just let this slide". So don't let it slide. If you're going to make a comment like that, then back it up with some action of your own (i.e. write the author of the article and report the response back to the masses) otherwise you're just patting yourself on the back and are no different from those you are complaining about. I think it's great that you finally wrote to the author for clarification on the quote and look forward to a response.
57 posted on 08/03/2007 8:11:18 AM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: snowrip
Wasn’t he also a member of the gang of 14? Flip him over the cliff he’s gone for!
58 posted on 08/03/2007 8:11:48 AM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas
ooops, gone should read done :)
59 posted on 08/03/2007 8:12:39 AM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty

Done all that. We’ve been down this path before.


60 posted on 08/03/2007 8:13:32 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson