The closest thing to "hate" found on FR might be our unbending condemnation of the Islamic push to rule the world.
If O'Reilly wants to take up the Islamic side and bash us, well then he has lost all credibility. I know Geraldo is not happy with us at all over illegals.
Any thread in which the topic is Hillary or Cindy Sheehan, for example, is not exactly a friendly thing to see. I don't even click on such anymore because all those threads contain are personal attacks, no debate of the issues. Most of the personal attacks on Hillary are of a joking nature ... no more or less than Letterman or Leno do every night.
That said ... we all know that FR is not a 'hate' site and that O'Reilly has absolutely no clue when he opines on this subject and he is apparently not open-minded enough to learn about FR when he has the chance. That is his loss. But he will use everything ugly that is said about him on this site to further his argument.
Here’s the thing: I always wonder why people want to think BOR is setting himself up as a conservative. He has never claimed to be a conservative. He has always claimed to be an independent.
So, being mad at BOR because he isn’t a conservative seems dumb. Be mad at him because he lacks integrity. Be mad at him because he’s an opportunistic blowhard. Be mad at him because a large percent of the time he comes off as an idiot that doesn’t have any idea of what he’s bloviating about. Be mad at him because he is a popinjay.
But there’s no reason to be mad at him because he turns out not to be something he never claimed to be.
Immigration is another ‘hot topic’ here on FR. It comes pretty close to hate as does some of the Bush bashing. But I call it ‘strongly dislike’ and not hate. There’s a difference between really hating what someone does and hating THEM.
Two of the cornerstones of Conservatism are fairness and truthfulness. BO proved that he fails miserably at both.