OBAMA: NO NUKES. (Would not use nuclear weapons 'in any circumstance')

Drudge ^ | 8/2/2007

[Uncledave]

OBAMA: NO NUKES...

Obama said Thursday he would not use nuclear weapons 'in any circumstance'... 'I think it would be a profound mistake for us to use nuclear weapons in any circumstance,' Obama said, with a pause, 'involving civilians' Then he quickly added, 'Let me scratch that'...

[newnhdad]

I was hoping that he’d be able to draw some of the air out of Mrs clinton’s campaign but it looks like that’s not going to happen.
I think his campaign is filled with clinton spies.

[mutley]

Peter Principle in action!

Classic, and on display for the whole world.

[NeoCaveman]

Obama might be the anti-christ.

No way. The antichrist will be intelligent.

This guy is dumber than they said Dan Quayle was.

[pgkdan]

But he’s so articulate! No wait, scratch that...

Clean too! oh wait...nevermind.

[M Kehoe]

One after another, Barak Hussein is really digging a hole. I know, I'll contact his campaign HQ and sell him some clues...nah.

5.56mm

[toddlintown]

Watch Hillary surge in the polls. Obama is officially RADIOACTIVE!

[meandog]

Ha-ha...or, as DUmmies would say: "Osamma Bamma, your (sic) a moran (sic)!"

[Orange1998]

Makes sense. A VP does not make the decision.

[Rummyfan]

The Illinois senator warned Pakistani President Gen. Pervez Musharraf earlier this week that he would use U.S. military force in Pakistan even with Musharraf’s permission if necessary to root out terrorists.

Gawd, the AP insinuates here that BHO actually has the authority to do so.

[toddlintown]

When’s the flip-flopping begin?

[TYVets]

Me too. My dad's first stop was Okinawa, next stop Japan...

So was my uncle.

[panaxanax]

“Unfortunately, as this dork implodes, he’ll drive more kook losers to Hitlery, making her more invincible!”

Finally, a voice of reason, thank you. As Conservatives, we should be supporting Osbama. He’ll be MUCH easier to beat than the beast.

[RC2]

I’d hate to see nukes used by anyone. But if it has to be, it has to be. During WWII, it is said that we saved over 500,000 of our boys lives by dropping nukes on Japan. If we get hit here in this country by nukes, the door is wide open and I would totally support this country responding in like. Nobody should be President that can’t use anything we have to protect this country.

[Rummyfan]

She's got the dem nomination sown up anyway.

Definitely. All the others are unqualifed or moonbats. All running for either the Veep slot or a position high in the Cabinet- State or Defense.

[mutley]

Finally, a voice of reason, thank you. As Conservatives, we should be supporting Osbama. He’ll be MUCH easier to beat than the beast.

Yes, but I think this was inevitable.

[CJ Wolf]

Clinton would use them, but only if we ran out of cruise missiles whilst bombing camel watering holes.

[LibLieSlayer]

Bush read 100 books last year... how many did osama read? Comics do not count.

LLS

[piperpilot]

Obama might be the anti-christ.

I've been saying that for a while now.

[uglybiker]

NO NUKES! NO NUKES!

[mmanager]

“It almost looks likes he’s trying to disqualify himself. His recent statements vis a vis foreign policy issues just couldn’t be worse. Maybe he’s taking himself out so that he can be more clearly positioned as VP.”

I believe he is nuking that option as well. With the statements he has made this week we will bury him in any debate including if he was on the ticket with the Beast in the General. He is toast, wrap him in the Times he sleeps with the fish.