Posted on 08/01/2007 4:09:49 PM PDT by kristinn
Edited on 08/01/2007 4:30:51 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
I received an e-mail today from the Fox News producer who booked me for the O'Reilly Factor last night. The links have been forwarded to Jim Robinson for review.
Jim asked me to start a thread with the links so that Freepers, and everyone else, could see for themselves what the fuss is about.
The Hillary Clinton stray bullet assassination comment was a very bad joke comment that someone posted two days ago. It was flagged last night after the O'Reilly Factor broadcast and was removed by a moderator. It is available for the time being in Google cache:
To: Virginia Ridgerunner I like my scenario better:
After eight years of the economy faltering, interest rates are 19%, 900,000 people are dead in Iraq since we left, taxes have gone up by 60% and Chile, Bolivia and Columbia are now Communist regimes, a stray bullet at a NARAL rally catches President Clinton and kills her.
As they take away Cindy Sheehan she screams why did she have to remove the troops? We were winning.
The next day the dow goes up 2000 points and closes at 2150.
4 posted on 07/30/2007 11:00:43 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (The Democrat Party: "Everyone is equal, but some are more equal then others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]
Don't even bother trying to defend that one. Assassination jokes have no place on Free Republic. Yes, Cindy Sheehan has written of her fantasizies about killing President Bush--and she's not joking, but that's her problem. We're better than that.
The "homosexuals are dogs" comment is taken out of context. The actual quote is "Homosexuals are the modern day dogs in the manger." That was in reference to an article about proprieters in the U.K. not being allowed to deny hotel accomodations to homosexual couples on account of religious belief.
The American Heritage online dictionary gives this description for the phrase: dog in the manger, NOUN: Inflected forms: pl. dogs in the manger. One who prevents others from enjoying what one has no use for oneself. ETYMOLOGY: From a fable in which a dog prevented an ox from eating hay he did not want himself.
That comment was posted two days ago and has also been removed by the moderators. It is available for now in Google cache.
The "I hate blacks" comment was nowhere to be found in the other threads referenced.
The threads are about crime in the black community, gangsta culture and Jesse Jackson. Two of the threads are in the Smoky Backroom.
Homosexuals+are+the+modern-day+dogs+in+the+manger
Time for the Truth About Black Crime Rates
Jesse Jackson interview about Imus
Sagging Pants May Have Contributed To Fatal Shooting
stray+bullet+at+a+NARAL+rally+catches+President
O'Reilly's suggestion that FR requires "professional moderation" is a direct attack on the freedom of we-the-people to discuss politics, and neither more nor less. But as the case of O'Reilly's "hate blacks" fraud shows, improving FR's moderation is not at all the point. I can't imagine Free Republic remaining Free Republic if the moderators were to undertake to routinely censor things as tepid as that.
Is it, or is it not, true that FR successfully brought this exact issue to court against a local California governmental agency which presumed to call FR a "hate site?" I would think that if that is correct, a letter to that effect from FR to O'Reilly, mildly asking for an apology, would be in order. Such a letter might begin by noting that Mark Twain used to lump incongruous things together for humorous effect, but that if lumping FR in with Daily Kos was an attempt at humor it was perhaps the lamest joke since Bill Clinton promised an ethical administration.
If O'Reilly were to persist in that absurd "hate site" characterization, FR would ultimately be forced to sue. If so, it should ask only for its legal costs - and for advertising time to point out that FreeRepublic is edited for a conservative audience, including families with children, and children sometimes participate. FR therefore discourages the posting of even mild profanity, let alone things which are truly offensive. It is an adult - not an adolescent but an adult - site.
Sorry but Free Republic is full of disgusting comments. The mods may do a good job at keeping trolls out but they should dont care what a lot of the regular posts say. IF Free Republic was the only view of the Republican party that I ever got then I would think Republicans were the most hate filled group out there.
It isnt everyone, of course, but there are a large number of people on here that should keep their mouth shut most of the time. That will never happen though.
Where's the B.S. meter? You sound like O’Reilly here. Got any documentation to back up your accusations?
“Most extreme posts are probably trolls anyway.”
Yes, I think so...wouldn’t surprise me if DU came on just to cause trouble!
Re post 198 - DBM is Drive By Media, phrase coined by Rush L
OOPS, thanks for correcting me.
I asked someone who the heck the nutcase was. Someone told me that he was a well known anti-gunner and he came to these rallies to make 2nd Amendment supporters look bad.
1. The overwhelming majority of comments on FR are not offensive.
2. To be fair, BOR, go to DU and check some of their posts. Remember the high-five celebrations they were throwing when President Reagan passed away? 3. This country has not seen the kind of political hatred that we have suffered since 2000 since the Civil War. The Left in this country, abetted by their allies in the MSM, are the hate mongers. They are peddling hate for one reason: to win political power. If we have "hate" it is reactionary and aimed at their hatred.
To use their term, this is a “non-event.”
Forget the apology. Let’s think about a slander suit.
Now THAT’S obscene.
Courtesy comment:
Yep, just a tad out of place.
More like a comment one would expect to see on the airhead blogs.
The man truly thinks he is singlehandedly saving civilization.
He’s the ultimate bloviating bore.
Thanks again for your work, kristinn.
Hey, I’ve witnessed/heard many people on O’Reilly’s show make hateful comments. Therefore, O’Reilly is a hate monger.
Right?
When Bill gets up to three billion segments archived, I will give you four of his that some might find offensive.
This is a political and cultural discussion forum with all sorts of comments being posted in real time, extemporaneously.
courtesy comment:
You got that right.
Beck is right now better than a lot of the talk hosts that have suddenly gotten that Ole Time Pompous Arrogant Religion.
It really does cause me some heartburn for guys like O’Really to tell me what guidelines I must follow to say certain things on any forum.
If Bill wants bad comments he needs to go to some of the forums for residency doctors from foreign countries.
Forums that allow Muslim doctors from Pakistani, Indian, Syrian other foreign nationals using four letter words to call our country, it’s citizens and our evil way of life inferior in many ways.
FR is tame compared to the ones in the medical community.
I don’t watch O’Reilly. Hope you called him to task for misrepresenting Free Republic and demanded an apology.
I heard Rush mention there were some talk radio shows that had to pay stations to air their program. He didn’t mention whose shows that could be, of course.
Was BOR one of them?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.