To: weegee
If the entire female population were immunized, it would have the effect of protecting the straight male population. I don’t see how this isn’t clear.
41 posted on
08/01/2007 11:42:53 AM PDT by
dangerdoc
(dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
To: dangerdoc
Except that you'd be asking the entire female population to put a substance in to their bodies which has been rammed through the testing process. There is no long-term data on possible side-effects. There have been no studies on young women in the 9 to -12 year range -- which is the pop. they want to start inoculating.
Everyone should have the CHOICE to get the vaccine, but I'll wait to get my daughter the shot until I'm confident Merck and the FDA have actually done their homework.
64 posted on
08/01/2007 1:02:04 PM PDT by
Malacoda
(A day without a pi$$ed-off muslim is like a day without sunshine.)
To: dangerdoc
If the entire female population were immunized, it would have the effect of protecting the straight male population. I don’t see how this isn’t clear. The men would get HPV, the women would be immune to the effects. For now. Until it mutates. If both men and women were vaccinated, both sexes would be immune and it would cease to be passed along.
This seems lost on you.
72 posted on
08/01/2007 1:35:00 PM PDT by
weegee
(NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
To: dangerdoc
If the entire female population were immunized, it would have the effect of protecting the straight male population. I don’t see how this isn’t clear. And vice versa. Let the entire prepubertal male population do it, and get back to us later. After all, if they care about their future partners....
102 posted on
08/02/2007 12:06:57 AM PDT by
Judith Anne
(Thank you St. Jude for favors granted.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson