Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom
So you’re saying the medical researchers in the study were lying? On what basis?

My opinion? Yes, I think they are skewing the results in an organized campaign to recriminalize marijuana possession in Britain.

A joint DOESN’T hit the lungs like 5 cigarettes?

The studies I posted say no. Didn't bother to read them, did you?

It DOESN’T cause the lung damage that showed up on the CAT scans? Did they falsify the results to prove the point they wanted?

According to non-politically motivated studies, smoking marijuana does not have the same cancer risk as tobacco cigarettes. I think they cherry picked data to reach a predetermined, politically motivated conclusion. They are drug warrior zealots participating in an organized disinformation campaign, after all.
69 posted on 08/01/2007 8:57:55 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: mysterio

Yeah, right. Zealots. When all else fails resort to name calling.


76 posted on 08/01/2007 9:15:12 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson