"No hay nada ver aquí, para andar por."
"No hay nada ver aquí, para andar por."
King Vanity absolutely refuses to be an organ donor for fear of some Dr. doing this to him.
Fact it isn’t just Muslim docs who suggest the severly disabled lives are worthless.
Have had a few euro American docs get ticked at me for advocating KV’s right to life and he has paper work that is notorized to state such.
Only God can take him home.
I wouldn’t be surprised if he is, I just want to make sure before we jump on the bandwagon.. none of the articles I’ve seen mention his religion.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22147256-5013404,00.html
Meanwhile, in Australia:
Adam Cresswell, Health editor | July 28, 2007
THE inquest into the death of a 16-year-old girl who died in a Sydney hospital after being hit by a golf ball may have to be reopened following allegations about the competence and assessment of two overseas-trained doctors involved in her care.
The allegations — aired on ABC TV’s Stateline program in NSW last night — claimed neither of the overseas doctors treating Vanessa Anderson had been “subject to any appointments or selection process”.
Anderson died in 2005 while being treated for a fractured skull caused by the golf ball.
The inquest at Westmead Coroners Court, which held its final hearing two weeks ago, heard there were “a number of deficiencies” in her care, including one doctor’s failure to give anti-convulsive drugs as ordered by a consultant.
Another doctor, anaesthetics registrar Sanaa Ismail, increased the dosage of painkilling drugs to a level the consultant in charge told the inquest was “too high”.
It has now emerged that the inquest may be reopened after a senior hospital anaesthetist, Stephen Barratt, wrote to Deputy State Coroner Carl Milovanich about the allegations.
In a statement to Stateline, NSW Health director-general Debora Picone said the “accuracy and relevance of a number of the assertions” made by Dr Barratt were “disputed”.
“The tragic death of Vanessa deserves proper investigation by the state Coroner and I do not think it appropriate to pre-empt the coronial process,” Professor Picone said.
In his letter, Dr Barratt said Dr Ismail — whom he was supervising — had previously been judged by him to be “not safe” to treat patients after two previous incidents just months earlier. Dr Barratt also revealed he was “unhappy” with how the inquest had unfolded and added “you need the truth”.
Azizi Bakar, the doctor who had failed to provide the anti-convulsive drugs ordered by a consultant, was the other doctor whom Dr Barratt suggested had not been properly screened prior to employment.
Dr Ismail faced questions during the inquest over her decision to double the dose of a painkilling opiate drug, oxycodone, to treat Anderson’s headache, despite the fact that she only spoke to the patient for a pre-operative check.
Dr Ismail said she did not realise Anderson was already receiving Panadeine Forte, a painkiller with a high level of codeine, another opiate drug.
Dr Barratt’s letter alleged that Dr Ismail’s salary was being paid by the Saudi Government, an arrangement that he said was “not unusual in the public hospital system — that is, there are many others like her”.
“In fact, a few months before the Vanessa Anderson incident a bureaucrat from the Department of Health came pleading with us to take more of these ‘trainees’,” Dr Barratt wrote.
Professor Picone said “learning exchange” arrangements was a “feature of any modern health system”. Out of a total 11,000 doctors in NSW public hospitals, about 100 at any one time would be paid for by an overseas government or other agency, she said.
Alison Reid, medical director of the NSW Medical Board, refused to discuss the case specifically but said that generally applications to register doctors first had to come from a prospective employer, supported by letters from the relevant medical college. Qualifications were independently verified and certificates of good standing sought from previous regulatory bodies.
What does it matter what religion he is? He wouldn’t be the first overanxious doc to want to speed the organ harvesting procedure.
[A Muslim doctor, Dr. Hootan Roozrokh, murdered his patient to harvest his organs. And—surprise!—the Muslim doctor was raised here in America. ]
Perfect article to give my friend, huh??
http://www.nowpublic.com/beleaguered_kaiser_permanente_besieged_by_bad_news
Managed care giant Kaiser Permanente continued to suffer scathing reports this week about the safety of its patients and the quality of its hospitals.
On Tuesday, the Los Angeles Times reported that five of the organization’s 28 California hospitals scored among the deadliest in the state for patients with pneumonia on a new report. The five Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, along with 23 other facilities, had an average death rate of 17.2%, more than double the mortality rate of 8.1% for the top 25 hospitals on the report. Across the state, 12.29% of pneumonia patients died within 30 days of admission.
Then, on Wednesday, the Times reported on an investigation by authorities into the death of Ruben Navarro, a 26-year-old San Luis Obispo man. The San Luis Obispo Police and the Medical Board of California are investigating whether Kaiser Permanente transplant surgeon Dr. Hootan Roozrokh may have euthanized Navarro in order to harvest his organs. The Medical Board is also investigating the conduct of Dr. Arturo Martinez, who was, at the time, surgical director of Kaiser Permanente’s transplant program.
The two reports come as the organization grapples with significant fallout from a series of recent reports. In May, the organization, under pressure from federal and state regulators, was forced to shutter its San Francisco kidney transplant unit after the Times uncovered evidence that the unit had among the worst death rates of any kidney transplant program in California. In a bizarre twist, Roozrokh and Martinez, the surgeons being investigated in Navarro’s death, had both previously been involved with the San Francisco unit before it was shut down...
Great doctor. Must hav esubscribed to the Hypocritical Oath.
I think its a bad thing to lump all Muslims together.....
| Department / Business Unit | Transplant Department |
|---|---|
| Institution | San Francisco Medical Center |
| Disciplines | Nanomedicine |
| City | San Francisco |
| State / Provence | California |
| Country | USA |
| Website | link |
Pinging to yet another thread...
This was probably a case where the death was not motivated by hatred of the patient on the part of the accused doctor, but rather by a perverse "program" in place at the Kaiser-Permanente system. The M. O. of the program would be acquire organs for transplantation by convincing terminally ill patients' families to cut off tratment for their loved ones so that the timing of the death can be controlled and the harvesting procedure can be done expeditiously thereafter. In that way, the harvested organs would have a better chance of being preserved for successful transplantation.
Judging from the fact that the incident occurred in San Luis Obispo County and the accused doctor is based in San Francisco, it could well be that he was flown about 200 miles to the hospital where the patient was with the specific mission of harvesting the organs. When the patient did not die promptly enough, he decided to speed things up.
If these circumstances pertained, the doctor's actions were immoral and illegal, but were certainly not based on Jihadi ideology. And certainly, Kaiser Permanente should share the guilt for the existence of this kind of euthanasia for harvesting program.
Ping!
They’re still better off than the Mexicans tossed back into Mexico with a bad hangover and one less kidney
