Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Turret Gunner A20
uh, What's offensive about a naked mannequin? Why would you feel forced to turn a child's head away? There are no genitalia on a mannequin. What would be the difference between a naked mannequin and one with a bikini painted on? Or one with a skimpy bikini at that. BTW, better not take the kids in Sears--they might be changing a mannequin in public.

IMHO, Americans in general have a bizarre hangup when it comes to nakedness. Guns, violence, blood, destruction, drugs, and all manner of perversion are perfectly OK for kids to watch on TV, but a naked body is shunned and protested. Now we can't even allow them to see a naked mannequin? Obviously some people don't have enough to worry about.

26 posted on 07/31/2007 1:27:21 PM PDT by AngryNeighbor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AngryNeighbor
re; #24

Well, there are many people who are offended, whether you like it or not, and it is a disgusting, petty, childish thing for a grown man to do -- offend an entire neighborhood just because he can't get the town council to issue him a permit to open a beauty parlor(?)across the street from an elementary school. It takes a special kind of twisted pervert to do that.

By the way, before you start with a bunch of false assumption about me -- naked mannequins per se do not offend me; but putting them in obviously "sexual" positions for kids to see does.

The man is a lowlife pig.

27 posted on 07/31/2007 2:30:13 PM PDT by Turret Gunner A20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson